fix debuginfo for windows_gnullvm_base.rs
These lines (including the FIXME comment) were added to windows_gnu_base.rs in cf2c492ef8 but windows_gnullvm_base.rs was not updated. This resulted in an error `LLVM ERROR: dwo only supported with ELF and Wasm` attempting to build on aarch64-pc-windows-gnullvm.
See also https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/pull/13921#issuecomment-1304391707
/cc ```@mati865``` ```@davidtwco```
r? ```@davidtwco```
Remove `in_tail_expr` from FnCtxt
Cleans up yet another unneeded member from `FnCtxt`. The `in_tail_expr` condition wasn't even correct -- it was set for true while typechecking the whole fn body.
Specialize `iter::ArrayChunks::fold` for TrustedRandomAccess iterators
```
OLD:
test iter::bench_trusted_random_access_chunks ... bench: 368 ns/iter (+/- 4)
NEW:
test iter::bench_trusted_random_access_chunks ... bench: 30 ns/iter (+/- 0)
```
The resulting assembly is similar to #103166 but the specialization kicks in under different (partially overlapping) conditions compared to that PR. They're complementary.
In principle a TRA-based specialization could be applied to all `ArrayChunks` methods, including `next()` as we do for `Zip` but that would have all the same hazards as the Zip specialization. Only doing it for `fold` is far less hazardous. The downside is that it only helps with internal, exhaustive iteration. I.e. `for _ in` or `try_fold` will not benefit.
Note that the regular, `try_fold`-based and the specialized `fold()` impl have observably slightly different behavior. Namely the specialized variant does not fetch the remainder elements from the underlying iterator. We do have a few other places in the standard library where beyond-the-end-of-iteration side-effects are being elided under some circumstances but not others.
Inspired by https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/yaft60/zerocost_iterator_abstractionsnot_so_zerocost/
The type is unsafe and now exposed to the whole crate.
Document it properly and add an unsafe method so the
caller can make it visible that something unsafe is happening.
Normalize types when deducing closure signature from supertraits
Elaborated supertraits should be normalized, since there's no guarantee they don't contain projections 😅Fixes#104025
r? types
Mention const and lifetime parameters in error E0207
Error Index for E0207 must mention const and lifetime parameters. In addition, add code examples for these situations.
Fixes#80862
Add a codegen test for rust-lang/rust#96152
This is a regression test for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96152, it is intended to check that our codegen for a particular strict provenance pattern is always as good as the ptr2int2ptr/provenance-ignoring style.
r? `@nikic`
Remove #![allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)] from rustc_infer
Related to #84447
This PR probably needs to be benchmarked to check for regressions.
These lines (including the FIXME comment) were added to windows_gnu_base.rs in cf2c492ef8 but windows_gnullvm_base.rs was not updated. This resulted in an error `LLVM ERROR: dwo only supported with ELF and Wasm` attempting to build on aarch64-pc-windows-gnullvm.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Drake <github@jdrake.com>
LLVM 16: Update RISCV data layout
The RISCV data layout was changed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/974e2e690b4024c2677dde26cc76ec31e0047c1d.
This updates all `riscv64*` targets, though I don't really know what the difference between the `gc` and `imac` ones is.
Passes `x test codegen` at LLVM head and with the currently bundled LLVM version. Without this patch, some tests fail with:
> error: internal compiler error: compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/context.rs:192:13: data-layout for target `riscv64gc-unknown-none-elf`, `e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n64-S128`, differs from LLVM target's `riscv64` default layout, `e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128
Add type_array to BaseTypeMethods
Moved `type_array` function to `rustc_codegen_ssa::BaseTypeMethods` trait. This allows using normal `alloca` function to create arrays as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104022.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
rustdoc: various cross-crate reexport fixes
Fixes for various smaller cross-crate reexport issues.
The PR is split into several commits for easier review. Will be squashed after approval.
Most notable changes:
* We finally render late-bound lifetimes in the generic parameter list of cross-crate functions & methods.
Previously, we would display the re-export of `pub fn f<'s>(x: &'s str) {}` as `pub fn f(x: &'s str)`
* We now render unnamed parameters of cross-crate functions and function pointers as underscores
since that's exactly what we do for local definitions, too. Mentioned as a bug in #44306.
* From now on, the rendering of cross-crate trait-object types is more correct:
* `for<>` parameter lists (for higher-ranked lifetimes) are now shown
* the return type of `Fn{,Mut,Once}` trait bounds is now displayed
Regarding the last list item, here is a diff for visualization (before vs. after):
```patch
- dyn FnOnce(&'any str) + 'static
+ dyn for<'any> FnOnce(&'any str) -> bool + 'static
```
The redundant `+ 'static` will be removed in a follow-up PR that will hide trait-object lifetime-bounds if they coincide with [their default](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/lifetime-elision.html#default-trait-object-lifetimes) (see [Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/clean_middle_ty.3A.20I.20need.20to.20add.20a.20parameter/near/307143097)). `FIXME(fmease)`s were added.
``@rustbot`` label A-cross-crate-reexports
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
lcnr