coroutine_clone: add comments
I was very surprised to learn that coroutines can be cloned. This has non-trivial semantic consequences that I do not think have been considered. Lucky enough, it's still unstable. Let's add some comments and pointers so we hopefully become aware when a MIR opt actually is in conflict with this.
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-mir-opt`
Explain why a type is not eligible for `impl PointerLike`.
The rules were baffling when I ran in to them trying to add some impls (to `std`, not my own code, as it happens), so I made the compiler explain them to me.
The logic of the successful cases is unchanged, but I did rearrange it to reverse the order of the primitive and `Adt` cases; this makes producing the errors easier. I'm still not very familiar with `rustc` internals, so let me know if there's a better way to do any of this.
This also adds test coverage for which impls are accepted or rejected, which I didn't see any of already.
The PR template tells me I should consider mentioning a tracking issue, but there isn't one for `pointer_like_trait`, so I'll mention `dyn_star`: #102425
Use E0665 for missing `#[default]` on enum and update doc
The docs for E0665 when doing `#[derive(Default]` on an `enum` previously didn't mention `#[default]` at all, or made a distinction between unit variants, that can be annotated, and tuple or struct variants, which cannot.
E0665 was not being emitted, we now use it for the same error it belonged to before.
```
error[E0665]: `#[derive(Default)]` on enum with no `#[default]`
--> $DIR/macros-nonfatal-errors.rs:42:10
|
LL | #[derive(Default)]
| ^^^^^^^
LL | / enum NoDeclaredDefault {
LL | | Foo,
LL | | Bar,
LL | | }
| |_- this enum needs a unit variant marked with `#[default]`
|
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Default` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: make this unit variant default by placing `#[default]` on it
|
LL | #[default] Foo,
| ++++++++++
help: make this unit variant default by placing `#[default]` on it
|
LL | #[default] Bar,
| ++++++++++
```
Bump Fuchsia toolchain for testing
This updates the Fuchsia SDK used to test rust on Fuchsia to 26.20241211.7.1, and clang to the development version 20 from 388d7f144880dcd85ff31f06793304405a9f44b6.
```@steven807``` asked me to take over the PR. Since I don't have commit access to his repo, I just cherry picked his patch here.
try-job: dist-various-2
r? lqd
Correctly document CTFE behavior of is_null and methods that call is_null.
The "panic in const if CTFE doesn't know the answer" behavior was discussed to be the desired behavior in #74939, and is currently how the function actually behaves.
I intentionally wrote this documentation to allow for the possibility that a panic might not occur even if the pointer is out of bounds, because of #133700 and other potential changes in the future.
This is beta-nominated since `const fn is_null` stabilization is in beta already but the docs there are wrong, and it seems better to have the docs be correct at the time of stabilization.
Win: Use POSIX rename semantics for `std::fs::rename` if available
Windows 10 1601 introduced `FileRenameInfoEx` as well as `FILE_RENAME_FLAG_POSIX_SEMANTICS`, allowing for atomic renaming and renaming if the target file is has already been opened with `FILE_SHARE_DELETE`, in which case the file gets renamed on disk while the open file handle still refers to the old file, just like in POSIX. This resolves#123985, where atomic renaming proved difficult to impossible due to race conditions.
If `FileRenameInfoEx` isn't available due to missing support from the underlying filesystem or missing OS support, the renaming is retried with `FileRenameInfo`, which matches the behavior of `MoveFileEx`.
This PR also manually replicates parts of `MoveFileEx`'s internal logic, as reverse-engineered from the disassembly: If the source file is a reparse point and said reparse point is a mount point, the mount point itself gets renamed; otherwise the reparse point is resolved and the result renamed.
Notes:
- Currently, the `win7` target doesn't bother with `FileRenameInfoEx` at all; it's probably desirable to remove that special casing and try `FileRenameInfoEx` anyway if it doesn't exist, in case the binary is run on newer OS versions.
Fixes#123985
Foundations of location-sensitive polonius
I'd like to land the prototype I'm describing in the [polonius project goal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/118). It still is incomplete and naive and terrible but it's working "well enough" to consider landing.
I'd also like to make review easier by not opening a huge PR, but have a couple small-ish ones (the +/- line change summary of this PR looks big, but >80% is moving datalog to a single place).
This PR starts laying the foundation for that work:
- it refactors and collects 99% of the old datalog fact gen, which was spread around everywhere, into a single dedicated module. It's still present at 3 small places (one of which we should revert anyways) that are kinda deep within localized components and are not as easily extractable into the rest of fact gen, so it's fine for now.
- starts introducing the localized constraints, the building blocks of the naive way of implementing the location-sensitive analysis in-tree, which is roughly sketched out in https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2023/09/22/polonius-part-1/ and https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2023/09/29/polonius-part-2/ but with a different vibe than per-point environments described in these posts, just `r1@p: r2@q` constraints.
- sets up the skeleton of generating these localized constraints: converting NLL typeck constraints, and creating liveness constraints
- introduces the polonius dual to NLL MIR to help development and debugging. It doesn't do much currently but is a way to see these localized constraints: it's an NLL MIR dump + a dumb listing of the constraints, that can be dumped with `-Zdump-mir=polonius -Zpolonius=next`. Its current state is not intended to be a long-term thing, just for testing purposes -- I will replace its contents in the future with a different approach (an HTML+js file where we can more easily explore/filter/trace these constraints and loan reachability, have mermaid graphs of the usual graphviz dumps, etc).
I've started documenting the approach in this PR, I'll add more in the future. It's quite simple, and should be very clear when more constraints are introduced anyways.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Best reviewed per commit so that the datalog move is less bothersome to read, but if you'd prefer we separate that into a different PR, I can do that (and michael has offered to review these more mechanical changes if it'd help).
Use orphaned error code for the same error it belonged to before.
```
error[E0665]: `#[derive(Default)]` on enum with no `#[default]`
--> $DIR/macros-nonfatal-errors.rs:42:10
|
LL | #[derive(Default)]
| ^^^^^^^
LL | / enum NoDeclaredDefault {
LL | | Foo,
LL | | Bar,
LL | | }
| |_- this enum needs a unit variant marked with `#[default]`
|
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Default` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: make this unit variant default by placing `#[default]` on it
|
LL | #[default] Foo,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
help: make this unit variant default by placing `#[default]` on it
|
LL | #[default] Bar,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
handle member constraints directly in the mir type checker
cleaner, faster, easier to change going forward :> fixes#109654
r? `@oli-obk` `@compiler-errors`
The "panic in const if CTFE doesn't know the answer" behavior was discussed to be the desired behavior in #74939, and is currently how the function actually behaves.
I intentionally wrote this documentation to allow for the possibility that a panic might not occur even if the pointer is out of bounds, because of #133700 and other potential changes in the future.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #133087 (Detect missing `.` in method chain in `let` bindings and statements)
- #134575 (Handle `DropKind::ForLint` in coroutines correctly)
- #134576 (Improve prose around basic examples of Iter and IterMut)
- #134577 (Improve prose around `as_slice` example of Iter)
- #134579 (Improve prose around into_slice example of IterMut)
- #134593 (Less unwrap() in documentation)
- #134600 (Fix parenthesization of chained comparisons by pretty-printer)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix parenthesization of chained comparisons by pretty-printer
Example:
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
() => {
1 < 2
};
}
fn main() {
let _ = repro!() == false;
}
```
Previously `-Zunpretty=expanded` would pretty-print this syntactically invalid output: `fn main() { let _ = 1 < 2 == false; }`
```console
error: comparison operators cannot be chained
--> <anon>:8:23
|
8 | fn main() { let _ = 1 < 2 == false; }
| ^ ^^
|
help: parenthesize the comparison
|
8 | fn main() { let _ = (1 < 2) == false; }
| + +
```
With the fix, it will print `fn main() { let _ = (1 < 2) == false; }`.
Making `-Zunpretty=expanded` consistently produce syntactically valid Rust output is important because that is what makes it possible for `cargo expand` to format and perform filtering on the expanded code.
## Review notes
According to `rg '\.fixity\(\)' compiler/` the `fixity` function is called only 3 places:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/13170cd787cb733ed24842ee825bcbd98dc01476/compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state/expr.rs#L283-L287
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/13170cd787cb733ed24842ee825bcbd98dc01476/compiler/rustc_hir_pretty/src/lib.rs#L1295-L1299
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/13170cd787cb733ed24842ee825bcbd98dc01476/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs#L282-L289
The 2 pretty printers definitely want to treat comparisons using `Fixity::None`. That's the whole bug being fixed. Meanwhile, the parser's `Fixity::None` codepath is previously unreachable as indicated by the comment, so as long as `Fixity::None` here behaves exactly the way that `Fixity::Left` used to behave, you can tell that this PR definitely does not constitute any behavior change for the parser.
My guess for why comparison operators were set to `Fixity::Left` instead of `Fixity::None` is that it's a very old workaround for giving a good chained comparisons diagnostic (like what I pasted above). Nowadays that is handled by a different dedicated codepath.
Less unwrap() in documentation
I think the common use of `.unwrap()` in examples makes it overrepresented, looking like a more typical way of error handling than it really is in real programs.
Therefore, this PR changes a bunch of examples to use different error handling methods, primarily the `?` operator. Additionally, `unwrap()` docs warn that it might abort the program.
Improve prose around into_slice example of IterMut
Having a part without modification and one with seems redundant, since `into_slice` is only called for the part without. I have brought the modification into the remaining part, although it perhaps does not add much (or only distracts?).
Detect missing `.` in method chain in `let` bindings and statements
On parse errors where an ident is found where one wasn't expected, see if the next elements might have been meant as method call or field access.
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator, found `map`
--> $DIR/missing-dot-on-statement-expression.rs:7:29
|
LL | let _ = [1, 2, 3].iter()map(|x| x);
| ^^^ expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator
|
help: you might have meant to write a method call
|
LL | let _ = [1, 2, 3].iter().map(|x| x);
| +
```
The rules were baffling when I ran in to them trying to add some impls,
so I made the compiler explain them to me.
The logic of the successful cases is unchanged, but I did rearrange it
to reverse the order of the primitive and `Adt` cases; this makes
producing the errors easier.
Update cargo
10 commits in 99dff6d77db779716dda9ca3b29c26addd02c1be..652623b779c88fe44afede28bf7f1c9c07812511
2024-12-18 00:55:17 +0000 to 2024-12-20 15:44:42 +0000
- fix(package): use relpath to cwd for vcs dirtiness report (rust-lang/cargo#14970)
- Enable triagebot merge conflict notifications (rust-lang/cargo#14972)
- fixed the error message for a user to open the crate (rust-lang/cargo#14969)
- fix(package): show dirty filepaths relative to git workdir (rust-lang/cargo#14968)
- Add the `test` cfg as a well known cfg before of compiler change (rust-lang/cargo#14963)
- refactor(cargo-package): let-else to flatten code (rust-lang/cargo#14959)
- fix(cargo-package): add more traces (rust-lang/cargo#14960)
- Do not hash absolute sysroot path into stdlib crates metadata. (rust-lang/cargo#14951)
- docs: add missing argument to Rustup Cargo workaround (rust-lang/cargo#14954)
- fix(cargo-rustc): stabilize higher precedence trailing flags (rust-lang/cargo#14900)
On parse errors where an ident is found where one wasn't expected, see if the next elements might have been meant as method call or field access.
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator, found `map`
--> $DIR/missing-dot-on-statement-expression.rs:7:29
|
LL | let _ = [1, 2, 3].iter()map(|x| x);
| ^^^ expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator
|
help: you might have meant to write a method call
|
LL | let _ = [1, 2, 3].iter().map(|x| x);
| +
```
Also lint on option of function pointer comparisons
This PR is the first part of #134536, ie. the linting on `Option<{fn ptr}>` in the `unpredictable_function_pointer_comparisons` lint, which isn't part of the lang nomination that the second part is going trough, and so should be able to be approved independently.
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134527
r? `@compiler-errors`
Restrict `#[non_exaustive]` on structs with default field values
Do not allow users to apply `#[non_exaustive]` to a struct when they have also used default field values.
Arbitrary self types v2: no deshadow pre feature.
The arbitrary self types v2 work introduces a check for shadowed methods, whereby a method in some "outer" smart pointer type may called in preference to a method in the inner referent. This is bad if the outer pointer adds a method later, as it may change behavior, so we ensure we error in this circumstance.
It was intended that this new shadowing detection system only comes into play for users who enable the `arbitrary_self_types` feature (or of course everyone later if it's stabilized). It was believed that the new deshadowing code couldn't be reached without building the custom smart pointers that `arbitrary_self_types` enables, and therefore there was no risk of this code impacting existing users.
However, it turns out that cunning use of `Pin::get_ref` can cause this type of shadowing error to be emitted now. This commit adds a test for this case.
As we want this test to pass without arbitrary_self_types, but fail with it, I've split it into two files (one with run-pass and one without). If there's a better way I can amend it.
Part of #44874
r? ```@wesleywiser```
Matthias Krüger