Normalize types when deducing closure signature from supertraits
Elaborated supertraits should be normalized, since there's no guarantee they don't contain projections 😅Fixes#104025
r? types
Mention const and lifetime parameters in error E0207
Error Index for E0207 must mention const and lifetime parameters. In addition, add code examples for these situations.
Fixes#80862
Add a codegen test for rust-lang/rust#96152
This is a regression test for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96152, it is intended to check that our codegen for a particular strict provenance pattern is always as good as the ptr2int2ptr/provenance-ignoring style.
r? `@nikic`
Remove #![allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)] from rustc_infer
Related to #84447
This PR probably needs to be benchmarked to check for regressions.
LLVM 16: Update RISCV data layout
The RISCV data layout was changed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/974e2e690b4024c2677dde26cc76ec31e0047c1d.
This updates all `riscv64*` targets, though I don't really know what the difference between the `gc` and `imac` ones is.
Passes `x test codegen` at LLVM head and with the currently bundled LLVM version. Without this patch, some tests fail with:
> error: internal compiler error: compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/context.rs:192:13: data-layout for target `riscv64gc-unknown-none-elf`, `e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n64-S128`, differs from LLVM target's `riscv64` default layout, `e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128
Add type_array to BaseTypeMethods
Moved `type_array` function to `rustc_codegen_ssa::BaseTypeMethods` trait. This allows using normal `alloca` function to create arrays as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104022.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
rustdoc: various cross-crate reexport fixes
Fixes for various smaller cross-crate reexport issues.
The PR is split into several commits for easier review. Will be squashed after approval.
Most notable changes:
* We finally render late-bound lifetimes in the generic parameter list of cross-crate functions & methods.
Previously, we would display the re-export of `pub fn f<'s>(x: &'s str) {}` as `pub fn f(x: &'s str)`
* We now render unnamed parameters of cross-crate functions and function pointers as underscores
since that's exactly what we do for local definitions, too. Mentioned as a bug in #44306.
* From now on, the rendering of cross-crate trait-object types is more correct:
* `for<>` parameter lists (for higher-ranked lifetimes) are now shown
* the return type of `Fn{,Mut,Once}` trait bounds is now displayed
Regarding the last list item, here is a diff for visualization (before vs. after):
```patch
- dyn FnOnce(&'any str) + 'static
+ dyn for<'any> FnOnce(&'any str) -> bool + 'static
```
The redundant `+ 'static` will be removed in a follow-up PR that will hide trait-object lifetime-bounds if they coincide with [their default](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/lifetime-elision.html#default-trait-object-lifetimes) (see [Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/clean_middle_ty.3A.20I.20need.20to.20add.20a.20parameter/near/307143097)). `FIXME(fmease)`s were added.
``@rustbot`` label A-cross-crate-reexports
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
Implement `std::marker::Tuple`, use it in `extern "rust-call"` and `Fn`-family traits
Implements rust-lang/compiler-team#537
I made a few opinionated decisions in this implementation, specifically:
1. Enforcing `extern "rust-call"` on fn items during wfcheck,
2. Enforcing this for all functions (not just ones that have bodies),
3. Gating this `Tuple` marker trait behind its own feature, instead of grouping it into (e.g.) `unboxed_closures`.
Still needing to be done:
1. Enforce that `extern "rust-call"` `fn`-ptrs are well-formed only if they have 1/2 args and the second one implements `Tuple`. (Doing this would fix ICE in #66696.)
2. Deny all explicit/user `impl`s of the `Tuple` trait, kinda like `Sized`.
3. Fixing `Tuple` trait built-in impl for chalk, so that chalkification tests are un-broken.
Open questions:
1. Does this need t-lang or t-libs signoff?
Fixes#99820
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103012 (Suggest use .. to fill in the rest of the fields of Struct)
- #103851 (Fix json flag in bootstrap doc)
- #103990 (rustdoc: clean up `.logo-container` layout CSS)
- #104002 (fix a comment in UnsafeCell::new)
- #104014 (Migrate test-arrow to CSS variables)
- #104016 (Add internal descriptions to a few queries)
- #104035 (Add 'closure match' test to weird-exprs.rs.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Migrate test-arrow to CSS variables
There should be no UI changes. I kept both `color` and `background-color` properties even though only the ayu theme is actually completely making use of them on hover.
r? ``@notriddle``
fix a comment in UnsafeCell::new
There are several safe methods that access the inner value: `into_inner` has existed since forever and `get_mut` also exists since recently. So this comment seems just wrong. But `&self` methods return raw pointers and thus require unsafe code (though the methods themselves are still safe).
Pietro Albini