Fix the test directories suggested by `./x.py suggest`
It seems that these paths were correct when #106249 was being written, but since then #106458 has been merged (moving `src/test/` to `tests/`), making the tool's suggestions incorrect.
More robust debug assertions for `Instance::resolve` on built-in traits with non-standard trait items
In #111264, a user added a new item to the `Future` trait, but the code in [`resolve_associated_item`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_ty_utils/instance/fn.resolve_associated_item.html) implicitly assumes that the `Future` trait is defined with only one method (`Future::poll`) and treats the generator body as the implementation of that method.
This PR adds some debug assertions to make sure that that new methods defined on `Future`/`Generator`/etc. don't accidentally resolve to the wrong item when they are added, and adds a helpful comment guiding a compiler dev (or curious `#![no_core]` user) to what must be done to support adding new associated items to these built-in implementations.
I am open to discuss whether a test should be added, but I chose against it because I opted to make these `bug!()`s instead of, e.g., diagnostics or fatal errors. Arguably it doesn't need a test because it's not a bug that can be triggered by an end user, and internal-facing misuses of core kind of touch on rust-lang/compiler-team#620 -- however, I think the assertions I added in this PR are still a very useful way to make sure this bug doesn't waste debugging resources down the line.
Fixes#111264
add hint for =< as <=
Adds a compiler hint for when `=<` is typed instead of `<=`
Example hint:
```rust
fn foo() {
if 1 =< 3 {
println!("Hello, World!");
}
}
```
```
error: expected type, found `3`
--> main.rs:2:13
|
2 | if 1 =< 3 {
| -- ^ expected type
| |
| help: did you mean: `<=`
```
This PR only emits the suggestion if there is no space between the `=` and `<`. This hopefully narrows the scope of when this error is emitted, however this still allows this error to be emitted in cases such as this:
```
error: expected expression, found `;`
--> main.rs:2:18
|
2 | if 1 =< [i32;; 3]>::hello() {
| -- ^ expected expression
| |
| help: did you mean: `<=`
```
Which could be a good reason not to merge since I haven't been able to think of any other ways of narrowing the scope of this diagnostic.
closes#111128
debuginfo: split method declaration and definition
When we're adding a method to a type DIE, we only want a DW_AT_declaration
there, because LLVM LTO can't unify type definitions when a child DIE is a
full subprogram definition. Now the subprogram definition gets added at the
CU level with a specification link back to the abstract declaration.
Both GCC and Clang write debuginfo this way for C++ class methods.
Fixes#109730.
Fixes#109934.
Make the BUG_REPORT_URL configurable by tools
This greatly simplifies how hard it is to set a custom bug report url; previously tools had to copy
the entire hook implementation.
I haven't changed clippy in case they want to make the change upstream instead of the subtree, but
I'm happy to do so here if the maintainers want - cc ````@rust-lang/clippy````
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109486.
Use fulfillment to check `Drop` impl compatibility
Use an `ObligationCtxt` to ensure that a `Drop` impl does not have stricter requirements than the ADT that it's implemented for, rather than using a `SimpleEqRelation` to (more or less) syntactically equate predicates on an ADT with predicates on an impl.
r? types
### Some background
The old code reads:
```rust
// An earlier version of this code attempted to do this checking
// via the traits::fulfill machinery. However, it ran into trouble
// since the fulfill machinery merely turns outlives-predicates
// 'a:'b and T:'b into region inference constraints. It is simpler
// just to look for all the predicates directly.
```
I'm not sure what this means, but perhaps in the 8 years since that this comment was written (cc #23638) it's gotten easier to process region constraints after doing fulfillment? I don't know how this logic differs from anything we do in the `compare_impl_item` module. Ironically, later on it says:
```rust
// However, it may be more efficient in the future to batch
// the analysis together via the fulfill (see comment above regarding
// the usage of the fulfill machinery), rather than the
// repeated `.iter().any(..)` calls.
```
Also:
* Removes `SimpleEqRelation` which was far too syntactical in its relation.
* Fixes#110557
Add `force` option for `--extern` flag
When `--extern force:foo=libfoo.so` is passed to `rustc` and `foo` is not actually used in the crate, ~inject an `extern crate foo;` statement into the AST~ force it to be resolved anyway in `CrateLoader::postprocess()`. This allows you to, for instance, inject a `#[panic_handler]` implementation into a `#![no_std]` crate without modifying its source so that it can be built as a `dylib`. It may also be useful for `#![panic_runtime]` or `#[global_allocator]`/`#![default_lib_allocator]` implementations.
My work previously involved integrating Rust into an existing C/C++ codebase which was built with Buck and shipped on, among other platforms, Android. When targeting Android, Buck builds all "native" code with shared linkage* so it can be loaded from Java/Kotlin. My project was not itself `#![no_std]`, but many of our dependencies were, and they would fail to build with shared linkage due to a lack of a panic handler. With this change, that project can add the new `force` option to the `std` dependency it already explicitly provides to every crate to solve this problem.
*This is an oversimplification - Buck has a couple features for aggregating dependencies into larger shared libraries, but none that I think sustainably solve this problem.
~The AST injection happens after macro expansion around where we similarly inject a test harness and proc-macro harness. The resolver's list of actually-used extern flags is populated during macro expansion, and if any of our `--extern` arguments have the `force` option and weren't already used, we inject an `extern crate` statement for them. The injection logic was added in `rustc_builtin_macros` as that's where similar injections for tests, proc-macros, and std/core already live.~
(New contributor - grateful for feedback and guidance!)
Update the version of musl used on `*-linux-musl` targets to 1.2.3
Update the version of musl used on our Linux musl targets from 1.1.24 to 1.2.3 as proposed in rust-lang/compiler-team#572. musl 1.2.3 is the latest version of musl and supports the same range of Linux kernels as the 1.1 series. As such, it does not affect the minimum supported version of Linux for any of the musl targets.
One of the major musl 1.2 features is support for [time64](https://musl.libc.org/time64.html). This support is both source and ABI compatible with programs built against musl 1.1 and so updating the musl version for these targets should not cause Rust programs to fail to run or compile (a [crater run](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107129#issuecomment-1407196104) has been completed which demonstrates this for the `i686-unknown-linux-musl` target).
Once this change reaches stable, the `libc` crate will then be able to [update their definitions to support 64-bit time](https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/pull/3068), matching the default musl 1.2 APIs exactly.
Fixes#91178
Mark `ErrorGuaranteed` constructor as deprecated so people don't use it
You should never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever use this function unless you know what you're doing, so make it harder to accidentally use it!
Alternatives are to change the name to sound scarier, make it `unsafe` (though it's not really a soundness thing), or work on deeper refactors to make it private.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Issue 109502 follow up, remove unnecessary Vec::new() from compile_test()
As mentioned in comment on PR #110773 , adding a separate function to pass the test passes into the `dump-mir` is a bit nicer
Fix MXCSR configuration dependent timing
Dependent on the (potentially secret) data some vector instructions operate on, and the content in MXCSR, instruction retirement may be delayed by one cycle. This is a potential side channel.
This PR fixes this vulnerability for the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` platform by loading MXCSR with `0x1fbf` through an `xrstor` instruction when the enclave is entered and executing an `lfence` immediately after. Other changes of the MXCSR happen only when the enclave is about to be exited and no vector instructions will be executed before it will actually do so. Users of EDP who change the MXCSR and do wish to defend against this side channel, will need to implement the software mitigation described [here](https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/best-practices/mxcsr-configuration-dependent-timing.html).
cc: `@jethrogb` `@monokles`
Add FreeBSD cpuset support to `std::thread::available_concurrency`
Use libc::cpuset_getaffinity to determine the CPUs available to the current process.
The existing sysconf and sysctl paths are left as fallback.
rustdoc-search: add slices and arrays to index
This indexes them as primitives with generics, so `slice<u32>` is how you search for `[u32]`, and `array<u32>` for `[u32; 1]`. A future commit will desugar the square bracket syntax to search both arrays and slices at once.
Stabilize raw-dylib, link_ordinal, import_name_type and -Cdlltool
This stabilizes the `raw-dylib` feature (#58713) for all architectures (i.e., `x86` as it is already stable for all other architectures).
Changes:
* Permit the use of the `raw-dylib` link kind for x86, the `link_ordinal` attribute and the `import_name_type` key for the `link` attribute.
* Mark the `raw_dylib` feature as stable.
* Stabilized the `-Zdlltool` argument as `-Cdlltool`.
* Note the path to `dlltool` if invoking it failed (we don't need to do this if `dlltool` returns an error since it prints its path in the error message).
* Adds tests for `-Cdlltool`.
* Adds tests for being unable to find the dlltool executable, and dlltool failing.
* Fixes a bug where we were checking the exit code of dlltool to see if it failed, but dlltool always returns 0 (indicating success), so instead we need to check if anything was written to `stderr`.
NOTE: As previously noted (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104218#issuecomment-1315895618) using dlltool within rustc is temporary, but this is not the first time that Rust has added a temporary tool use and argument: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104218#issuecomment-1318720482
Big thanks to ``````@tbu-`````` for the first version of this PR (#104218)
Matthias Krüger