Fix suggestion of additional `pub` when using `pub pub fn ...`
Fix#87694.
Marked as draft to start with because I want to explore doing the same fix for `const const fn` and other repeated-but-valid keywords.
`@rustbot` label A-diagnostics D-invalid-suggestion T-compiler
Implement let-else type annotations natively
Tracking issue: #87335Fixes#89688, fixes#89807, edit: fixes #89960 as well
As explained in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89688#issuecomment-940405082, the previous desugaring moved the let-else scrutinee into a dummy variable, which meant if you wanted to refer to it again in the else block, it had moved.
This introduces a new hir type, ~~`hir::LetExpr`~~ `hir::Let`, which takes over all the fields of `hir::ExprKind::Let(...)` and adds an optional type annotation. The `hir::Let` is then treated like a `hir::Local` when type checking a function body, specifically:
* `GatherLocalsVisitor` overrides a new `Visitor::visit_let_expr` and does pretty much exactly what it does for `visit_local`, assigning a local type to the `hir::Let` ~~(they could be deduplicated but they are right next to each other, so at least we know they're the same)~~
* It reuses the code in `check_decl_local` to typecheck the `hir::Let`, simply returning 'bool' for the expression type after doing that.
* ~~`FnCtxt::check_expr_let` passes this local type in to `demand_scrutinee_type`, and then imitates check_decl_local's pattern checking~~
* ~~`demand_scrutinee_type` (the blindest change for me, please give this extra scrutiny) uses this local type instead of of creating a new one~~
* ~~Just realised the `check_expr_with_needs` was passing NoExpectation further down, need to pass the type there too. And apparently this Expectation API already exists.~~
Some other misc notes:
* ~~Is the clippy code supposed to be autoformatted? I tried not to give huge diffs but maybe some rustfmt changes simply haven't hit it yet.~~
* in `rustc_ast_lowering/src/block.rs`, I noticed some existing `self.alias_attrs()` calls in `LoweringContext::lower_stmts` seem to be copying attributes from the lowered locals/etc to the statements. Is that right? I'm new at this, I don't know.
Do array-slice equality via array equality, rather than always via slices
~~Draft because it needs a rebase after #91766 eventually gets through bors.~~
This enables the optimizations from #85828 to be used for array-to-slice comparisons too, not just array-to-array.
For example, <https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=5f9ba69b3d5825a782f897c830d3a6aa>
```rust
pub fn demo(x: &[u8], y: [u8; 4]) -> bool {
*x == y
}
```
Currently writes the array to stack for no reason:
```nasm
sub rsp, 4
mov dword ptr [rsp], edx
cmp rsi, 4
jne .LBB0_1
mov eax, dword ptr [rdi]
cmp eax, dword ptr [rsp]
sete al
add rsp, 4
ret
.LBB0_1:
xor eax, eax
add rsp, 4
ret
```
Whereas with the change in this PR it just compares it directly:
```nasm
cmp rsi, 4
jne .LBB1_1
cmp dword ptr [rdi], edx
sete al
ret
.LBB1_1:
xor eax, eax
ret
```
Update cargo
8 commits in a359ce16073401f28b84840da85b268aa3d37c88..fcef61230c3b6213b6b0d233a36ba4ebd1649ec3
2021-12-14 18:40:22 +0000 to 2021-12-17 02:30:38 +0000
- Minor docs change for `cargo test --help` (rust-lang/cargo#10210)
- Make clippy happy (rust-lang/cargo#10205)
- Enhance descriptions of issue templates (rust-lang/cargo#10202)
- Add workaround for sporadic kills when building on Macos (rust-lang/cargo#10196)
- Detect filesystem loop during walking the projects (rust-lang/cargo#10188)
- Error about not having any crates with documentation (rust-lang/cargo#10204)
- Don't document libs with doc=false (rust-lang/cargo#10201)
- Bumps up tar to 0.4.36 (rust-lang/cargo#10198)
Implement normalize_erasing_regions queries in terms of 'try' version
Attempt to lessen performance regression caused by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91255
r? `@jackh726`
Fix#91306 by deriving all access from a single *mut T
Fixes#91306.
The previous code is invalid because the first argument to `copy_nonoverlapping` is invalidated by the mutable borrow taken out to construct the second argument.
I believe this patch fixes that, and this code should now pass Miri with `-Ztag-raw-pointers`, ~~but I'm currently stuck trying to run my reproducer with a this patched version of the standard library (alternatively, running Miri on the standard library tests itself would suffice).~~ Ralf walked me through this on Zulip.
I've also added fixes for 7 more problems other than those I reported. Most of them are easy to hit by calling sort_unstable on random arrays. I don't have reproducers for every change, but they seem pretty clear-cut to me. But I did only start learning stacked borrows 2 days ago so that might be a large dash of Dunning-Kruger.
Add `io::Error::other`
This PR adds a small utility constructor, `io::Error::other`, a shorthand for `io::Error::new(io::ErrorKind::Other, err)`, something I find myself writing often.
For some concrete stats, a quick search on [grep.app](https://grep.app) shows that more than half of the uses of `io::Error::new` use `ErrorKind::Other`:
```
Error::new\((?:std::)?(?:io::)?ErrorKind:: => 3,898 results
Error::new\((?:std::)?(?:io::)?ErrorKind::Other => 2,186 results
```
Most of these problems originate in use of get_unchecked_mut.
When calling ptr::copy_nonoverlapping, using get_unchecked_mut for both
arguments causes the borrow created to make the second pointer to invalid the
first.
The pairs of identical MaybeUninit::slice_as_mut_ptr calls similarly
invalidate each other.
There was also a similar borrow invalidation problem with the use of
slice::get_unchecked_mut to derive the pointer for the CopyOnDrop.
link to pref_align_of tracking issue
If we are not going to remove this intrinsic (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90877), I think we should at least have a place to centralize discussion around it, so here we go. Intrinsics don't have their own separate features and usually we instead use the public method for tracking it, but this one does not have such a method... so the tracking issue is just a regular link. (And then we sue it for the const part as well.)
update stdarch
2 commits in d219ad63c5075098fc224a57deb4852b9734327d..0716b22e902207efabe46879cbf28d0189ab7924
2021-12-9 23:50:37 +0000 to 2021-12-14 16:17:57 +0100
* Fix a bunch of typos ([Fix a bunch of typos stdarch#1267](https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1267))
* Stabilize armv8 neon instruction set on aarch64 ([Stabilize armv8 neon instruction set on aarch64 stdarch#1266](https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1266))
The update stabilizes armv8 neon instructions on aarch64. #90972
extend `simplify_type`
might cause a slight perf inprovement and imo more accurately represents what types there are.
considering that I was going to use this in #85048 it seems like we might need this in the future anyways 🤷
Add `unnecessary_to_owned` lint
This PR adds a lint to check for unnecessary calls to `ToOwned::to_owned` and other similar functions (e.g., `Cow::into_owned`, `ToString::to_string`, etc.).
The lint checks for expressions of the form `&receiver.to_owned_like()` used in a position requiring type `&T` where one of the following is true:
* `receiver`'s type is `T` exactly
* `receiver`'s type implements `Deref<Target = T>`
* `receiver`'s type implements `AsRef<T>`
The lint additionally checks for expressions of the form `receiver.to_owned_like()` used as arguments of type `impl AsRef<T>`.
It would be nice if the lint could also check for expressions used as arguments to functions like the following:
```
fn foo<T: AsRef<str>>(x: T) { ... }
```
However, I couldn't figure out how to determine whether a function input type was instantiated from a parameter with a trait bound.
If someone could offer me some guidance, I would be happy to add such functionality.
Closes#7933
changelog: Add [`unnecessary_to_owned`] lint
Constify `bool::then{,_some}`
Note on `~const Drop`: it has no effect when called from runtime functions, when called from const contexts, the trait system ensures that the type can be dropped in const contexts.
Make `TyS::is_suggestable` check for non-suggestable types structually
Not sure if I went overboard checking substs in dyn types, etc. Let me know if I should simplify this function.
Fixes#91832
Matthias Krüger
