We used to make the upvar types in the closure `==` but that was
stronger than we needed. Subtyping suffices, since we are copying the
upvar value into the closure field. This in turn allows us to infer
smaller lifetimes in captured values in some cases (like the example
here), avoiding errors.
config.toml.example: thinlto bootstrap was removed
It was removed in ff227c4a2d so remove the option that no longer works (we did not notice because it was commented out by default).
Add BufReader::buffer
This subsumes the need for an explicit is_empty function, and provides
access to the buffered data itself which has been requested from time to
time.
We could call this `buf` to match `fill_buf`, but I think I'd prefer `fill_buffer` anyways in hindsight.
rustbuild: Ship libsynchronization
Hot on the heels of #49044 comes similar issue with libsynchronization. Discovered while building clippy:
```
<skipped>
Compiling serde_derive v1.0.33
error: linking with `gcc` failed: exit code: 1
<skipped>
= note: ld: cannot find -lsynchronization
```
r? @nikomatsakis
Suggest removing `&`s
This implements the error message discussed in #47744.
We check whether removing each `&` yields a type that satisfies the requested obligation.
Also, it was created a new `NodeId` field in `ObligationCause` in order to iterate through the `&`s. The way it's implemented now, it iterates through the obligation snippet and counts the number of `&`.
r? @estebank
Implement Integer methods for Wrapping
Wrapping<T> now implements:
count_ones, count_zeros, leading_zeros,
trailing_zeros, rotate_left, rotate_right, swap_bytes, from_be,
from_le, to_be, to_le, and pow
where T is:
u8, u16, u32, u64, usize, i8, i16, i32, i64, or isize.
Docs were written for all these methods, as well as examples. The
examples mirror the ones on u8, u16, etc... for consistency.
Closes#32463
Improve documentation for Borrow
This is the first step in improving the documentation for all the reference conversion traits. It proposes new text for the trait documentation of `Borrow`. Since I feel it is a somewhat radical rewrite and includes a stricter contract for `Borrow` then the previous text—namely that *all* shared traits need to behave the same, not just a select few—, I wanted to get some feedback before continuing.
Apart from the ‘normative’ description, the new text also includes a fairly extensive explanation of how the trait is used in the examples section. I included it because every time I look at how `HashMap` uses the trait, I need to think for a while as the use is a bit twisted. So, I thought having this thinking written down as part of the trait itself might be useful. One could argue that this should go into The Book, and, while I really like having everything important in the docs, I can see the text moved there, too.
So, before I move on: is this new text any good? Do we feel it is correct, useful, comprehensive, and understandable?
(This PR is in response to #44868 and #24140.)
Cleanup metadata and incremental cache processing of constants
fixes#49033fixes#49081
we really need tests for this. do we have any cross compilation tests? I couldn't find any
Wrapping<T> now implements:
count_ones, count_zeros, leading_zeros,
trailing_zeros, rotate_left, rotate_right, swap_bytes, from_be,
from_le, to_be, to_le, and pow
where T is:
u8, u16, u32, u64, usize, i8, i16, i32, i64, or isize.
Docs were written for all these methods, as well as examples. The
examples mirror the ones on u8, u16, etc... for consistency.
Closes#32463
Add hexadecimal formatting of integers with fmt::Debug
This can be used for integers within a larger types which implements Debug (possibly through derive) but not fmt::UpperHex or fmt::LowerHex.
```rust
assert!(format!("{:02x?}", b"Foo\0") == "[46, 6f, 6f, 00]");
assert!(format!("{:02X?}", b"Foo\0") == "[46, 6F, 6F, 00]");
```
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2226
The new formatting string syntax (`x?` and `X?`) is insta-stable in this PR because I don’t know how to change a built-in proc macro’s behavior based of a feature gate. I can look into adding that, but I also strongly suspect that keeping this feature unstable for a time period would not be useful as possibly no-one would use it during that time.
This PR does not add the new (public) `fmt::Formatter` proposed in the API because:
* There was some skepticism on response to this part of the RFC
* It is not possible to implement as-is without larger changes to `fmt`, because `Formatter` at the moment has no easy way to tell apart for example `Octal` from `Binary`: it only has a function pointer for the relevant `fmt()` method.
If some integer-like type outside of `std` want to implement this behavior, another RFC will likely need to propose a different public API for `Formatter`.
Try to reduce amount of time on the asmjs builder
This PR has two commits for two separate strategies:
* First it disables optimizations for all tests, hopefully saving time by not optimizing the test code. This caused a number of run-pass tests to fail which are switched to being ignored here.
* Next it disables a number of test suites which aren't asm.js specific and already run elsewhere
cc #48826
Niko Matsakis