rustdoctest: suppress the default allow(unused) under --display-warnings
If you're passing rustdoc `--display-warnings`, you probably want to see the default ones too. This change modifies `test::make_test` to suppress the default `#![allow(unused)]` if the `--display-warnings` CLI flag was provided to rustdoc.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41574
Allow for re-using monomorphizations in upstream crates.
Followup to #48611. This implementation is pretty much finished modulo failing tests if there are any. Not quite ready for review yet though.
### DESCRIPTION
This PR introduces a `share-generics` mode for RLIBs and Rust dylibs. When a crate is compiled in this mode, two things will happen:
- before instantiating a monomorphization in the current crate, the compiler will look for that monomorphization in all upstream crates and link to it, if possible.
- monomorphizations are not internalized during partitioning. Instead they are added to the list of symbols exported from the crate.
This results in less code being translated and LLVMed. However, there are also downsides:
- it will impede optimization somewhat, since fewer functions can be internalized, and
- Rust dylibs will have bigger symbol tables since they'll also export monomorphizations.
Consequently, this PR only enables the `shared-generics` mode for opt-levels `No`, `Less`, `Size`, and `MinSize`, and for when incremental compilation is activated. `-O2` and `-O3` will still generate generic functions per-crate.
Another thing to note is that this has a somewhat similar effect as MIR-only RLIBs, in that monomorphizations are shared, but it is less effective because it cannot share monomorphizations between sibling crates:
```
A <--- defines `fn foo<T>() { .. }`
/ \
/ \
B C <--- both call `foo<u32>()`
\ /
\ /
D <--- calls `foo<u32>()` too
```
With `share-generics`, both `B` and `C` have to instantiate `foo<u32>` and only `D` can re-use it (from either `B` or `C`). With MIR-only RLIBs, `B` and `C` would not instantiate anything, and in `D` we would then only instantiate `foo<u32>` once.
On the other hand, when there are many leaf crates in the graph (e.g. when compiling many individual test binaries) then the `share-generics` approach will often be more effective.
### TODO
- [x] Add codegen test that makes sure monomorphizations can be internalized in non-Rust binaries.
- [x] Add codegen-units test that makes sure we share generics.
- [x] Add run-make test that makes sure we don't export any monomorphizations from non-Rust binaries.
- [x] Review for reproducible-builds implications.
AST: Give spans to all identifiers
Change representation of `ast::Ident` from `{ name: Symbol, ctxt: SyntaxContext }` to `{ name: Symbol, span: Span }`.
Syntax contexts still can be extracted from spans (`span.ctxt()`).
Why this should not require more memory:
- `Span` is `u32` just like `SyntaxContext`.
- Despite keeping more spans in AST we don't actually *create* more spans, so the number of "outlined" spans kept in span interner shouldn't become larger.
Why this may be slightly slower:
- When we need to extract ctxt from an identifier instead of just field read we need to do bit field extraction possibly followed by and access by index into span interner's vector. Both operations should be fast (unless the span interner is under some synchronization) and we already do ctxt extraction from spans all the time during macro expansion, so the difference should be lost in noise.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48842#issuecomment-373365661
Add compiletest `--compare-mode nll` option
Before implementing the tidy stuff, I'd appreciate if someone reviews the changes so far.
This is my first non-trivial pull request, so I could really use some feedback. :)
closes#48879.
r? @nikomatsakis
This commit updates our manifest generation for rustup to filter out any
components/extensions which are actually missing. This is intended to help
mitigate #49462 by making the manifests reflect reality, that many targets now
are missing a `rust-docs` component rather than requiring it exists.
proc_macro: Reorganize public API
This commit is a reorganization of the `proc_macro` crate's public user-facing
API. This is the result of a number of discussions at the recent Rust All-Hands
where we're hoping to get the `proc_macro` crate into ship shape for
stabilization of a subset of its functionality in the Rust 2018 release.
The reorganization here is motivated by experiences from the `proc-macro2`,
`quote`, and `syn` crates on crates.io (and other crates which depend on them).
The main focus is future flexibility along with making a few more operations
consistent and/or fixing bugs. A summary of the changes made from today's
`proc_macro` API is:
* The `TokenNode` enum has been removed and the public fields of `TokenTree`
have also been removed. Instead the `TokenTree` type is now a public enum
(what `TokenNode` was) and each variant is an opaque struct which internally
contains `Span` information. This makes the various tokens a bit more
consistent, require fewer wrappers, and otherwise provides good
future-compatibility as opaque structs are easy to modify later on.
* `Literal` integer constructors have been expanded to be unambiguous as to what
they're doing and also allow for more future flexibility. Previously
constructors like `Literal::float` and `Literal::integer` were used to create
unsuffixed literals and the concrete methods like `Literal::i32` would create
a suffixed token. This wasn't immediately clear to all users (the
suffixed/unsuffixed aspect) and having *one* constructor for unsuffixed
literals required us to pick a largest type which may not always be true. To
fix these issues all constructors are now of the form
`Literal::i32_unsuffixed` or `Literal::i32_suffixed` (for all integral types).
This should allow future compatibility as well as being immediately clear
what's suffixed and what isn't.
* Each variant of `TokenTree` internally contains a `Span` which can also be
configured via `set_span`. For example `Literal` and `Term` now both
internally contain a `Span` rather than having it stored in an auxiliary
location.
* Constructors of all tokens are called `new` now (aka `Term::intern` is gone)
and most do not take spans. Manufactured tokens typically don't have a fresh
span to go with them and the span is purely used for error-reporting
**except** the span for `Term`, which currently affects hygiene. The default
spans for all these constructed tokens is `Span::call_site()` for now.
The `Term` type's constructor explicitly requires passing in a `Span` to
provide future-proofing against possible hygiene changes. It's intended that a
first pass of stabilization will likely only stabilize `Span::call_site()`
which is an explicit opt-in for "I would like no hygiene here please". The
intention here is to make this explicit in procedural macros to be
forwards-compatible with a hygiene-specifying solution.
* Some of the conversions for `TokenStream` have been simplified a little.
* The `TokenTreeIter` iterator was renamed to `token_stream::IntoIter`.
Overall the hope is that this is the "final pass" at the API of `TokenStream`
and most of `TokenTree` before stabilization. Explicitly left out here is any
changes to `Span`'s API which will likely need to be re-evaluated before
stabilization.
All changes in this PR have already been reflected to the [`proc-macro2`],
`quote`, and `syn` crates. New versions of all these crates have also been
published to crates.io.
Once this lands in nightly I plan on making an internals post again summarizing
the changes made here and also calling on all macro authors to give the APIs a
spin and see how they work. Hopefully pending no major issues we can then have
an FCP to stabilize later this cycle!
[`proc-macro2`]: https://docs.rs/proc-macro2/0.3.1/proc_macro2/Closes#49596
Make queries thread safe
This makes queries thread safe by removing the query stack and making queries point to their parents. Queries write to the query map when starting and cycles are detected by checking if there's already an entry in the query map. This makes cycle detection O(1) instead of O(n), where `n` is the size of the query stack.
This is mostly corresponds to the method I described [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/parallelizing-rustc-using-rayon/6606).
cc @rust-lang/compiler
r? @michaelwoerister
Expand macros in `extern {}` blocks
This permits macro and proc-macro and attribute invocations (the latter only with the `proc_macro` feature of course) in `extern {}` blocks, gated behind a new `macros_in_extern` feature.
A tracking issue is now open at #49476closes#48747
Make queries thread safe
This makes queries thread safe by removing the query stack and making queries point to their parents. Queries write to the query map when starting and cycles are detected by checking if there's already an entry in the query map. This makes cycle detection O(1) instead of O(n), where `n` is the size of the query stack.
This is mostly corresponds to the method I described [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/parallelizing-rustc-using-rayon/6606).
cc @rust-lang/compiler
r? @michaelwoerister
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #48658 (Add a generic CAS loop to std::sync::Atomic*)
- #49253 (Take the original extra-filename passed to a crate into account when resolving it as a dependency)
- #49345 (RFC 2008: Finishing Touches)
- #49432 (Flush executables to disk after linkage)
- #49496 (Add more vec![... ; n] optimizations)
- #49563 (add a dist builder to build rust-std components for the THUMB targets)
- #49654 (Host compiler documentation: Include private items)
- #49667 (Add more features to rust_2018_preview)
- #49674 (ci: Remove x86_64-gnu-incremental builder)
Failed merges:
Host compiler documentation: Include private items
Fixes#29893. Now that compiler documentation is being hosted, including private items seems sensible as these types are going to be being used by contributors working on the compiler.
However, including this means that doc comments that contain codeblocks with invalid Rust and can fail the documenting of a given crate (as evidenced by the changes in the second commit included in this PR). We'd need some way of ensuring that this cannot happen so that these failures don't cause documenting to fail. I'm unsure whether this change to documentation steps will cause this to happen already or if something new will be required.
r? @alexcrichton
bors