In Option::get_or_insert_with(), forget the None instead of dropping it.

This allows eliminating the `T: [const] Destruct` bounds and avoids
generating an implicit `drop_in_place::<Option<T>>()` that will never do
anything.

Ideally, the compiler would prove that that drop is not necessary
itself, but it currently doesn't, even with `const_precise_live_drops`
enabled.

library/core/src/option.rs

@@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ pub fn get_or_insert(&mut self, value: T) -> &mut T {
     #[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_option_ops", issue = "143956")]
     pub const fn get_or_insert_default(&mut self) -> &mut T
     where
-        T: [const] Default + [const] Destruct,
+        T: [const] Default,
     {
         self.get_or_insert_with(T::default)
     }
@@ -1804,10 +1804,25 @@ pub const fn get_or_insert_default(&mut self) -> &mut T
     pub const fn get_or_insert_with<F>(&mut self, f: F) -> &mut T
     where
         F: [const] FnOnce() -> T + [const] Destruct,
-        T: [const] Destruct,
     {
         if let None = self {
-            *self = Some(f());
+            // The effect of the following statement is identical to
+            //     *self = Some(f());
+            // except that it does not drop the old value of `*self`. This is not a leak, because
+            // we just checked that the old value is `None`, which contains no fields to drop.
+            // This implementation strategy
+            //
+            // * avoids needing a `T: [const] Destruct` bound, to the benefit of `const` callers,
+            // * and avoids possibly compiling needless drop code (as would sometimes happen in the
+            //   previous implementation), to the benefit of non-`const` callers.
+            //
+            // FIXME(const-hack): It would be nice if this weird trick were made obsolete
+            // (though that is likely to be hard/wontfix).
+            //
+            // It could also be expressed as `unsafe { core::ptr::write(self, Some(f())) }`, but
+            // no reason is currently known to use additional unsafe code here.
+
+            mem::forget(mem::replace(self, Some(f())));
         }
 
         // SAFETY: a `None` variant for `self` would have been replaced by a `Some`

library/coretests/tests/option.rs

@@ -495,6 +495,30 @@ const fn option_const_mut() {
     */
 }
 
+/// Test that `Option::get_or_insert_default` is usable in const contexts, including with types that
+/// do not satisfy `T: const Destruct`.
+#[test]
+fn const_get_or_insert_default() {
+    const OPT_DEFAULT: Option<Vec<bool>> = {
+        let mut x = None;
+        x.get_or_insert_default();
+        x
+    };
+    assert!(OPT_DEFAULT.is_some());
+}
+
+/// Test that `Option::get_or_insert_with` is usable in const contexts, including with types that
+/// do not satisfy `T: const Destruct`.
+#[test]
+fn const_get_or_insert_with() {
+    const OPT_WITH: Option<Vec<bool>> = {
+        let mut x = None;
+        x.get_or_insert_with(Vec::new);
+        x
+    };
+    assert!(OPT_WITH.is_some());
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn test_unwrap_drop() {
     struct Dtor<'a> {