Various macro fixes for loop lints (#14631)

The `explicit_into_iter_loop`, `explicit_iter_loop` and `iter_next_loop`
will now:

- trigger only when the triggering expression is not located into macro
code;
- properly expose code rewrite proposal with code coming from the root
context.

changelog: [`explicit_into_iter_loop`, `explicit_iter_loop`,
`iter_next_loop`]: behave in macro context

Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#14630

clippy_lints/src/loops/explicit_into_iter_loop.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 use super::EXPLICIT_INTO_ITER_LOOP;
 use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_sugg;
 use clippy_utils::is_trait_method;
-use clippy_utils::source::snippet_with_applicability;
+use clippy_utils::source::snippet_with_context;
 use rustc_errors::Applicability;
 use rustc_hir::Expr;
 use rustc_lint::LateContext;
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ pub(super) fn check(cx: &LateContext<'_>, self_arg: &Expr<'_>, call_expr: &Expr<
     };
 
     let mut applicability = Applicability::MachineApplicable;
-    let object = snippet_with_applicability(cx, self_arg.span, "_", &mut applicability);
+    let object = snippet_with_context(cx, self_arg.span, call_expr.span.ctxt(), "_", &mut applicability).0;
     span_lint_and_sugg(
         cx,
         EXPLICIT_INTO_ITER_LOOP,

clippy_lints/src/loops/explicit_iter_loop.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 use super::EXPLICIT_ITER_LOOP;
 use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_sugg;
 use clippy_utils::msrvs::{self, Msrv};
-use clippy_utils::source::snippet_with_applicability;
+use clippy_utils::source::snippet_with_context;
 use clippy_utils::sym;
 use clippy_utils::ty::{
     implements_trait, implements_trait_with_env, is_copy, is_type_lang_item, make_normalized_projection,
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ pub(super) fn check(
     }
 
     let mut applicability = Applicability::MachineApplicable;
-    let object = snippet_with_applicability(cx, self_arg.span, "_", &mut applicability);
+    let object = snippet_with_context(cx, self_arg.span, call_expr.span.ctxt(), "_", &mut applicability).0;
     span_lint_and_sugg(
         cx,
         EXPLICIT_ITER_LOOP,

clippy_lints/src/loops/mod.rs

@@ -909,7 +909,9 @@ fn check_for_loop<'tcx>(
     }
 
     fn check_for_loop_arg(&self, cx: &LateContext<'_>, _: &Pat<'_>, arg: &Expr<'_>) {
-        if let ExprKind::MethodCall(method, self_arg, [], _) = arg.kind {
+        if !arg.span.from_expansion()
+            && let ExprKind::MethodCall(method, self_arg, [], _) = arg.kind
+        {
             match method.ident.name {
                 sym::iter | sym::iter_mut => {
                     explicit_iter_loop::check(cx, self_arg, arg, self.msrv, self.enforce_iter_loop_reborrow);

tests/ui/explicit_into_iter_loop.fixed

@@ -73,3 +73,16 @@ fn main() {
 
     for _ in S.into_iter::<u32>() {}
 }
+
+fn issue14630() {
+    macro_rules! mac {
+        (into_iter $e:expr) => {
+            $e.into_iter()
+        };
+    }
+
+    for _ in dbg!([1, 2]) {}
+    //~^ explicit_into_iter_loop
+
+    for _ in mac!(into_iter [1, 2]) {}
+}

tests/ui/explicit_into_iter_loop.rs

@@ -73,3 +73,16 @@ fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
 
     for _ in S.into_iter::<u32>() {}
 }
+
+fn issue14630() {
+    macro_rules! mac {
+        (into_iter $e:expr) => {
+            $e.into_iter()
+        };
+    }
+
+    for _ in dbg!([1, 2]).into_iter() {}
+    //~^ explicit_into_iter_loop
+
+    for _ in mac!(into_iter [1, 2]) {}
+}

tests/ui/explicit_into_iter_loop.stderr

@@ -37,5 +37,11 @@ error: it is more concise to loop over containers instead of using explicit iter
 LL |     for _ in mr.into_iter() {}
    |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: to write this more concisely, try: `&mut *mr`
 
-error: aborting due to 6 previous errors
+error: it is more concise to loop over containers instead of using explicit iteration methods
+  --> tests/ui/explicit_into_iter_loop.rs:84:14
+   |
+LL |     for _ in dbg!([1, 2]).into_iter() {}
+   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: to write this more concisely, try: `dbg!([1, 2])`
+
+error: aborting due to 7 previous errors
 

tests/ui/explicit_iter_loop.fixed

@@ -183,3 +183,16 @@ pub fn issue_13184() {
     let rvalues = &values;
     for _ in rvalues.iter() {}
 }
+
+fn issue14630() {
+    macro_rules! mac {
+        (iter $e:expr) => {
+            $e.into_iter()
+        };
+    }
+
+    for _ in &dbg!([1, 2]) {}
+    //~^ explicit_iter_loop
+
+    for _ in mac!(iter [1, 2]) {}
+}

tests/ui/explicit_iter_loop.rs

@@ -183,3 +183,16 @@ pub fn issue_13184() {
     let rvalues = &values;
     for _ in rvalues.iter() {}
 }
+
+fn issue14630() {
+    macro_rules! mac {
+        (iter $e:expr) => {
+            $e.into_iter()
+        };
+    }
+
+    for _ in dbg!([1, 2]).iter() {}
+    //~^ explicit_iter_loop
+
+    for _ in mac!(iter [1, 2]) {}
+}

tests/ui/explicit_iter_loop.stderr

@@ -112,5 +112,11 @@ error: it is more concise to loop over references to containers instead of using
 LL |     for _ in r.iter() {}
    |              ^^^^^^^^ help: to write this more concisely, try: `r`
 
-error: aborting due to 18 previous errors
+error: it is more concise to loop over references to containers instead of using explicit iteration methods
+  --> tests/ui/explicit_iter_loop.rs:194:14
+   |
+LL |     for _ in dbg!([1, 2]).iter() {}
+   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: to write this more concisely, try: `&dbg!([1, 2])`
+
+error: aborting due to 19 previous errors
 

tests/ui/iter_next_loop.rs

@@ -15,3 +15,16 @@ fn next(&self) -> std::slice::Iter<u8> {
     let u = Unrelated(&[0]);
     for _v in u.next() {} // no error
 }
+
+fn issue14630() {
+    macro_rules! mac {
+        (next $e:expr) => {
+            $e.iter().next()
+        };
+    }
+
+    for _ in dbg!([1, 2].iter()).next() {}
+    //~^ iter_next_loop
+
+    for _ in mac!(next [1, 2]) {}
+}

tests/ui/iter_next_loop.stderr

@@ -7,5 +7,11 @@ LL |     for _ in x.iter().next() {}
    = note: `-D clippy::iter-next-loop` implied by `-D warnings`
    = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::iter_next_loop)]`
 
-error: aborting due to 1 previous error
+error: you are iterating over `Iterator::next()` which is an Option; this will compile but is probably not what you want
+  --> tests/ui/iter_next_loop.rs:26:14
+   |
+LL |     for _ in dbg!([1, 2].iter()).next() {}
+   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors