From https://www.openbsd.org/octeon.html:
OpenBSD/octeon is a port intended to run on MIPS64-based systems that
utilize the Cavium OCTEON, OCTEON Plus, OCTEON II, and OCTEON III system on
chips.
glibc has never officially supported ELFv2 on big-endian PowerPC, and we do not
(and likely never will) support linking ELFv1. So just drop this target instead
of pretending we actually have anything resembling usable support for it. This
is a dying target anyway; IBM have been pushing people to powerpc64le for years
now, and most distros have dropped big endian.
glibc headers and abilists are not updated as part of this; I'll just let that
happen automatically on the next glibc update. Size savings are expected to be
very minimal anyway since there's large overlap between powerpc64 and
powerpc64le.
This commit also fixes a couple of bad assumptions in std.Target:
* The dynamic linker path should be /lib64/ld64.so.1. We should get this right
even if the Zig compiler doesn't support the target.
* cCallingConvention() was picking powerpc64_elf_v2 only for musl targets. In
reality, for the targets we support in std.Target, it should pick v2 for all
except powerpc64-linux-gnu.
Finally, this switches LLVM codegen to use ELFv2 data layout for all targets
except ps3.
ABI detection previously did not take into account the non-standard
directory structure of Android. This has been fixed.
The API level is detected by running `getprop ro.build.version.sdk`,
since we don't want to depend on bionic, and reading system properties
ourselves is not trivially possible.
FreeBSD 15 dropped this target. It also dropped x86-freebsd-none, but since that
target remains buildable and usable with the 32-bit compat layer, we keep it for
now.
This functionality -- if it's actually needed -- can be reintroduced through
some other mechanism. An ABI is clearly not the right way to represent it.
closes#25918
Apple's own headers and tbd files prefer to think of Mac Catalyst as a distinct
OS target. Earlier, when DriverKit support was added to LLVM, it was represented
a distinct OS. So why Apple decided to only represent Mac Catalyst as an ABI in
the target triple is beyond me. But this isn't the first time they've ignored
established target triple norms (see: armv7k and aarch64_32) and it probably
won't be the last.
While doing this, I also audited all Darwin OS prongs throughout the codebase
and made sure they cover all the tags.
Andrew Kelley