Files
rust/tests
Matthias Krüger d6966fa15a Rollup merge of #149274 - GuillaumeGomez:tyalias-method-link, r=lolbinarycat
Fix invalid link generation for type alias methods

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/149205.

That one was quite the wild ride. First commit is the actual fix, the second commit is just a small name variable improvement while I was going through the code. Anyway, let's go through it:

 * We don't generate directly implementations in the HTML files for local impls (which I think is a mistake and should be changed, gonna do that as a follow-up) but instead generate a JS file for each type alias containing the HTML for these impls.
 * So in `write_shared.rs::TypeAliasPart::get`, when generating the JS file, we generate the impl into a `String` by calling `render_impl`. This method expects an `AssocItemLink` to help it generate the correct link to the item (I'm planning to also remove this enum because it's yet another way to generate anchors/hrefs).
 * Problem was: we call the `provided_trait_methods` method on the impl item... which is empty if not a trait impl. This becomes an issue when we arrive in `render::assoc_href_attr` because of this code:
     ```rust
            AssocItemLink::GotoSource(did, provided_methods) => {
                let item_type = match item_type {
                    ItemType::Method | ItemType::TyMethod => {
                        if provided_methods.contains(&name) {
                            ItemType::Method
                        } else {
                            ItemType::TyMethod
                        }
                    }
                    item_type => item_type,
                };
                // ...
            }
    ```

     Since `provided_methods` is always empty, it means all methods on type aliases will be `TyMethod`, generating `#tymethod.` URLs instead of `#method.`.
 * So generating `AssocItemLink::GoToSource` only on traits (when `provided_trait_methods` is supposed to return something) was the fix.
 * And finally, because it's (currently) generating implementations only through JS, it means we cannot test it in `tests/rustdoc` so I had to write the test in `tests/rustdoc-gui`. Once I change how we generate local implementations for type aliases, I'll move it to `tests/rustdoc`.

r? ```@lolbinarycat```
2025-11-25 17:51:17 +01:00
..
2025-11-12 12:48:45 +01:00
2025-11-24 00:17:53 -06:00
2025-11-12 12:48:27 +01:00