mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2026-05-07 01:05:39 +03:00
Stuart Cook
6257825c8f
Make error message for missing fields with `..` and without `..` more consistent When `..` is not present, we say "missing field `bar` in initializer", but when it is present we say "missing mandatory field `bar`". I don't see why the primary error message should change, b/c the root cause is the same. Let's harmonize these error messages and instead use a label to explain that `..` is required b/c it's not defaulted. r? estebank