mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2026-05-05 03:24:06 +03:00
bors
c92a8e4d4d
Avoid follow-up errors and ICEs after missing lifetime errors on data structures Tuple struct constructors are functions, so when we call them typeck will use the signature tuple struct constructor function to provide type hints. Since typeck mostly ignores and erases lifetimes, we end up never seeing the error lifetime in writeback, thus not tainting the typeck result. Now, we eagerly taint typeck results by tainting from `resolve_vars_if_possible`, which is called all over the place. I did not carry over all the `crashes` test suite tests, as they are really all the same cause (missing or unknown lifetime names in tuple struct definitions or generic arg lists). fixes #124262 fixes #124083 fixes #125155 fixes #125888 fixes #125992 fixes #126666 fixes #126648 fixes #127268 fixes #127266 fixes #127304
UI Tests
This folder contains rustc's
UI tests.
Test Directives (Headers)
Typically, a UI test will have some test directives / headers which are special comments that tell compiletest how to build and intepret a test.
As part of an on-going effort to rewrite compiletest
(see https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/536), a major
change proposal to change legacy compiletest-style headers // <directive>
to ui_test-style headers
//@ <directive> was accepted (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/512.
An example directive is ignore-test. In legacy compiletest style, the header
would be written as
// ignore-test
but in ui_test style, the header would be written as
//@ ignore-test
compiletest is changed to accept only //@ directives for UI tests
(currently), and will reject and report an error if it encounters any
comments // <content> that may be parsed as an legacy compiletest-style
test header. To fix this, you should migrate to the ui_test-style header
//@ <content>.