Implement split_at_spare_mut without Deref to a slice so that the spare slice is valid
~I'm not sure I understand what's going on here correctly. And I'm pretty sure this safety comment needs to be changed. I'm just referring to the same thing that `as_mut_ptr_range` does.~ (Thanks `@RalfJung` for the guidance and clearing things up)
I tried to run https://github.com/rust-lang/miri-test-libstd on alloc with -Zmiri-track-raw-pointers, and got a failure on the test `vec::test_extend_from_within`.
I minimized the test failure into this program:
```rust
#![feature(vec_split_at_spare)]
fn main() {
Vec::<i32>::with_capacity(1).split_at_spare_mut();
}
```
The problem is that the existing implementation is actually getting a pointer range where both pointers are derived from the initialized region of the Vec's allocation, but we need the second one to be valid for the region between len and capacity. (thanks Ralf for clearing this up)
RawVec: don't recompute capacity after allocating.
Currently it sets the capacity to `ptr.len() / mem::size_of::<T>()`
after any buffer allocation/reallocation. This would be useful if
allocators ever returned a `NonNull<[u8]>` with a size larger than
requested. But this never happens, so it's not useful.
Removing this slightly reduces the size of generated LLVM IR, and
slightly speeds up the hot path of `RawVec` growth.
r? `@ghost`
Currently it sets the capacity to `ptr.len() / mem::size_of::<T>()`
after any buffer allocation/reallocation. This would be useful if
allocators ever returned a `NonNull<[u8]>` with a size larger than
requested. But this never happens, so it's not useful.
Removing this slightly reduces the size of generated LLVM IR, and
slightly speeds up the hot path of `RawVec` growth.
The previous implementation used slice::as_mut_ptr_range to derive the
pointer for the spare capacity slice. This is invalid, because that
pointer is derived from the initialized region, so it does not have
provenance over the uninitialized region.
Update example code for Vec::splice to change the length
The current example for `Vec::splice` illustrates the replacement of a section of length 2 with a new section of length 2. This isn't a particularly interesting case for splice, and makes it look a bit like a shorthand for the kind of manipulations that could be done with a mutable slice.
In order to provide a stronger example, this updates the example to use different lengths for the source and destination regions, and uses a slice from the middle of the vector to illustrate that this does not necessarily have to be at the beginning or the end.
Resolves#92067
add BinaryHeap::try_reserve and BinaryHeap::try_reserve_exact
`try_reserve` of many collections were stablized in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87993 in 1.57.0. Add `try_reserve` for the rest collections such as `BinaryHeap` should be not controversial.
Use spare_capacity_mut instead of invalid unchecked indexing when joining str
This is a fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91574
I think in general I'd prefer to see this code implemented with raw pointers or `MaybeUninit::write_slice`, but there's existing code in here based on copying from slice to slice, so converting everything from `&[T]` to `&[MaybeUninit<T>]` is less disruptive.
BTree: improve public descriptions and comments
BTreeSet has always used the term "value" next to and meaning the same thing as "elements" (in the mathematical sense but also used for key-value pairs in BTreeMap), while in the BTreeMap sense these "values" are known as "keys" and definitely not "values". Today I had enough of that.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Btree: assert more API compatibility
Introducing a member such as `BTreeSet::min()` would silently break compatibility if no code calls the existing `BTreeSet::min(set)`. `BTreeSet` is the only btree class silently bringing in stable members, apart from many occurrences of `#[derive(Debug)]` on iterators.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91668 (Remove the match on `ErrorKind::Other`)
- #91678 (Add tests fixed by #90023)
- #91679 (Move core/stream/stream/mod.rs to core/stream/stream.rs)
- #91681 (fix typo in `intrinsics::raw_eq` docs)
- #91686 (Fix `Vec::reserve_exact` documentation)
- #91697 (Delete Utf8Lossy::from_str)
- #91706 (Add unstable book entries for parts of asm that are not being stabilized)
- #91709 (Replace iterator-based set construction by *Set::From<[T; N]>)
- #91716 (Improve x.py logging and defaults a bit more)
- #91747 (Add pierwill to .mailmap)
- #91755 (Fix since attribute for const_linked_list_new feature)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Replace iterator-based set construction by *Set::From<[T; N]>
This uses the array-based construction for `BtreeSet`s and `HashSet`s instead of first creating an iterator. I could also replace the `let mut a = Set::new(); a.insert(...);` fragments if desired.
Fix `Vec::reserve_exact` documentation
The documentation previously said the new capacity cannot overflow `usize`, but in fact it cannot exceed `isize::MAX`.
Update documentation to use `from()` to initialize `HashMap`s and `BTreeMap`s
As of Rust 1.56, `HashMap` and `BTreeMap` both have associated `from()` functions. I think using these in the documentation cleans things up a bit. It allows us to remove some of the `mut`s and avoids the Initialize-Then-Modify anti-pattern.
replace vec::Drain drop loops with drop_in_place
The `Drain::drop` implementation came up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82185#issuecomment-789584796 as potentially interfering with other optimization work due its widespread use somewhere in `println!`
`@rustbot` label T-libs-impl
Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact
During developing #91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
Implement VecDeque::retain_mut
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90829.
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90772, someone suggested that `retain_mut` should also be implemented on `VecDeque`. I think that it follows the same logic (coherency). So first: is it ok? Second: should I create a new feature for it or can we put it into the same one?
r? `@joshtriplett`
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #88906 (Implement write() method for Box<MaybeUninit<T>>)
- #90269 (Make `Option::expect` unstably const)
- #90854 (Type can be unsized and uninhabited)
- #91170 (rustdoc: preload fonts)
- #91273 (Fix ICE #91268 by checking that the snippet ends with a `)`)
- #91381 (Android: -ldl must appear after -lgcc when linking)
- #91453 (Document Windows TLS drop behaviour)
- #91462 (Use try_normalize_erasing_regions in needs_drop)
- #91474 (suppress warning about set_errno being unused on DragonFly)
- #91483 (Sync rustfmt subtree)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Matthias Krüger