change field `tools` on `AttributeParser` to hold `&'tcx RegisteredTools`
Makes tools actually stored, and not just tool names
this was originally part of rust-lang/rust#155691 but was split out to make that PR smaller.
r? @petrochenkov
cc @JonathanBrouwer
Move `feature*` methods from `parse` mod to `errors` mod.
As the FIXME comment says, these no longer use `ParseSess` and so the `parse` mod is not a good place for them. The `errors` mod is a better home.
r? @TaKO8Ki
simplify `ast_fragments!`
The syntax and meaning of this macro are not very intuitive as its just a large dump of function names and has some special cases.
Each commit should be a small improvement that can be evaluated on its own.
`rustc_error_messages` currently depends on
`rustc_ast`/`rustc_ast_pretty`. This is odd, because
`rustc_error_messages` feels like a very low-level module but
`rustc_ast`/`rustc_ast_pretty` do not.
The reason is that a few AST types impl `IntoDiagArg` via
pretty-printing. `rustc_error_messages` can define `IntoDiagArg` and
then impl it for the AST types. But if we invert the dependency we hit
a problem with the orphan rule: `rustc_ast` must impl `IntoDiagArg`
for the AST types, but that requires calling pretty-printing code which
is in `rustc_ast_pretty`, a downstream crate.
This commit avoids this problem by just removing the `IntoDiagArg` impls
for these AST types. There aren't that many of them, and we can just use
`String` in the relevant error structs and use the pretty printer in the
downstream crates that construct the error structs. There are plenty of
existing examples where `String` is used in error structs.
There is now no dependency between `rustc_ast*` and
`rustc_error_messages`.
Remove attribute parsing `Stage`
I discovered that it is surprisingly easy to remove the concept of `Stage` in the attribute parsers, imo this makes the code a lot cleaner.
r? @jdonszelmann
cc @mejrs @Bryntet
`ParseSess` is separate from, but sits within, `Session`. The separation
is because there are some places (e.g. `Parser` methods) where
`ParseSess` is available but `Session` is not.
However, `ParseSess` has four fields that are only accessed from places
where `Session` is also available. This commit moves those fields to
`Session`. This means that `ParseSess` only contains the fields it
genuinely needs, and various `sess.psess.foo` occurrences are reduced to
`sess.foo`.
macro_metavar_expr_concat: explain why idents are invalid
Recently I've been playing around with `macro_metavar_expr_concat` and in the process wasted more time than I'd have liked on debugging my dodgy idents. This should make that experience much nicer going forward.
delegation: Track more precise spans for glob delegations
The last commit also fixes a macro hygiene issue with `self` in delegations found in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/154002.
Post-attribute ports cleanup pt. 1 (again)
This is a re-implementation of most (but not all) of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/154808
The code is the same as in that PR, other than a few changes, I'll leave comments where I changed things.
I did re-implement most of the commits rather than cherry-picking, so it's probably good to check the entire diff regardless
r? @jdonszelmann
Implement EII for statics
This PR implements EII for statics. I've tried to mirror the implementation for functions in a few places, this causes some duplicate code but I'm also not really sure whether there's a clean way to merge the implementations.
This does not implement defaults for static EIIs yet, I will do that in a followup PR
Use a linting node closer the parsing of `#[cfg_attr]`
The parsing of `#[cfg_attr]` unconditionally used the crate-root as a linting node to attach lints, but the `unexpected_cfgs` lint can fire when parsing the attribute and users expect to be able to allow it at places other than the crate-root.
Let's instead use the linting node id, which is unfortunately always the parent but that's better than the crate-root when you are in a sub-module.
The parsing of `#[cfg]` and other already use the expansion linting node id, so no change required there.
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/155118
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#152901 (Introduce a `#[diagnostic::on_unknown]` attribute)
- rust-lang/rust#155078 (Reject dangling attributes in where clauses)
- rust-lang/rust#154449 (Invert dependency between `rustc_errors` and `rustc_abi`.)
- rust-lang/rust#154646 (Add suggestion to `.to_owned()` used on `Cow` when borrowing)
- rust-lang/rust#154993 (compiletest: pass -Zunstable-options for unpretty and no-codegen paths)
- rust-lang/rust#155097 (Make `rustc_attr_parsing::SharedContext::emit_lint` take a `MultiSpan` instead of a `Span`)
Fix ICE when combining #[eii] with #[core::contracts::ensures]
Fixesrust-lang/rust#153745
Builtin attribute macros like #[eii] generate AST items programmatically without collected tokens. When another attribute macro was present on the same item, the compiler would panic in TokenStream::from_ast() trying to tokenize the generated items during subsequent attribute expansion.
Generate fake token streams (via pretty-print and re-parse) for Item and ForeignItem nodes that lack collected tokens, following the existing pattern used for Crate and out-of-line modules.
This PR introduces a `#[diagnostic::on_unknown_item]` attribute that
allows crate authors to customize the error messages emitted by
unresolved imports. The main usecase for this is using this attribute as
part of a proc macro that expects a certain external module structure to
exist or certain dependencies to be there.
For me personally the motivating use-case are several derives in diesel,
that expect to refer to a `tabe` module. That is done either
implicitly (via the name of the type with the derive) or explicitly by
the user. This attribute would allow us to improve the error message in
both cases:
* For the implicit case we could explicity call out our
assumptions (turning the name into lower case, adding an `s` in the end)
+ point to the explicit variant as alternative
* For the explicit variant we would add additional notes to tell the
user why this is happening and what they should look for to fix the
problem (be more explicit about certain diesel specific assumptions of
the module structure)
I assume that similar use-cases exist for other proc-macros as well,
therefore I decided to put in the work implementing this new attribute.
I would also assume that this is likely not useful for std-lib internal
usage.
Use fine grained component-wise span tracking in use trees
This often produces nicer spans and even doesn't need a Span field anymore (not that I expect the unused field to affect any perf, but still neat).
Jacob Pratt