Add docs for shared_from_slice From impls
The advantage of making these docs is mostly in pointing out that these
functions all make new allocations and copy/clone/move the source into them.
These docs are on the function, and not the `impl` block, to avoid showing
the "[+] show undocumented items" button.
CC #51430
Fix doc test for Vec::retain(), now passes clippy::eval_order_dependence
Doc test for Vec::retain() works correctly but is flagged by clippy::eval_order_dependence. Fix avoids the issue by using an iterator instead of an index.
Discovered this kind of issue in an unrelated library.
The author copied the tests from here and AFAIK, there are no tests for this particular case.
Signed-off-by: Hanif Bin Ariffin <hanif.ariffin.4326@gmail.com>
use RWlock when accessing os::env
Multiple threads modifying the current process environment is fairly uncommon. Optimize for the more common read case.
r? ````@m-ou-se````
Increment `self.index` before calling `Iterator::self.a.__iterator_ge…
…`t_unchecked` in `Zip` `TrustedRandomAccess` specialization
Otherwise if `Iterator::self.a.__iterator_get_unchecked` panics the
index would not have been incremented yet and another call to
`Iterator::next` would read from the same index again, which is not
allowed according to the API contract of `TrustedRandomAccess` for
`!Clone`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81740
The advantage of making these docs is mostly in pointing out that these
functions all make new allocations and copy/clone/move the source into them.
These docs are on the function, and not the `impl` block, to avoid showing
the "[+] show undocumented items" button.
CC #51430
BTreeMap: disentangle Drop implementation from IntoIter
No longer require every `BTreeMap` to dig up its last leaf edge before dying. This speeds up the `clone_` benchmarks by 25% for normal keys and values (far less for huge values).
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Optimize Vec::retain
Use `copy_non_overlapping` instead of `swap` to reduce memory writes, like what we've done in #44355 and `String::retain`.
#48065 already tried to do this optimization but it is reverted in #67300 due to bad codegen of `DrainFilter::drop`.
This PR re-implement the drop-then-move approach. I did a [benchmark](https://gist.github.com/oxalica/3360eec9376f22533fcecff02798b698) on small-no-drop, small-need-drop, large-no-drop elements with different predicate functions. It turns out that the new implementation is >20% faster in average for almost all cases. Only 2/24 cases are slower by 3% and 5%. See the link above for more detail.
I think regression in may-panic cases is due to drop-guard preventing some optimization. If it's permitted to leak elements when predicate function of element's `drop` panic, the new implementation should be almost always faster than current one.
I'm not sure if we should leak on panic, since there is indeed an issue (#52267) complains about it before.
Bump stabilization version for const int methods
These methods missed the beta cutoff. See #80962 for details.
`@rustbot` modify labels to +A-const-fn, +A-intrinsics
r? `@m-ou-se`
Make Vec::split_at_spare_mut public
This PR introduces a new method to the public API, under
`vec_split_at_spare` feature gate:
```rust
impl<T, A: Allocator> impl Vec<T, A> {
pub fn split_at_spare_mut(&mut self) -> (&mut [T], &mut [MaybeUninit<T>]);
}
```
The method returns 2 slices, one slice references the content of the vector,
and the other references the remaining spare capacity.
The method was previously implemented while adding `Vec::extend_from_within` in #79015,
and used to implement `Vec::spare_capacity_mut` (as the later is just a
subset of former one).
See also previous [discussion in `Vec::spare_capacity_mut` tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75017#issuecomment-770381335).
## Unresolved questions
- [ ] Should we consider changing the name? `split_at_spare_mut` doesn't seem like an intuitive name
- [ ] Should we deprecate `Vec::spare_capacity_mut`? Any usecase of `Vec::spare_capacity_mut` can be replaced with `Vec::split_at_spare_mut` (but not vise-versa)
r? `@KodrAus`
Add `Box::into_inner`.
This adds a `Box::into_inner` method to the `Box` type. <del>I actually suggest deprecating the compiler magic of `*b` if this gets stablized in the future.</del>
r? `@m-ou-se`
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #72209 (Add checking for no_mangle to unsafe_code lint)
- #80732 (Allow Trait inheritance with cycles on associated types take 2)
- #81697 (Add "every" as a doc alias for "all".)
- #81826 (Prefer match over combinators to make some Box methods inlineable)
- #81834 (Resolve typedef in HashMap lldb pretty-printer only if possible)
- #81841 ([rustbuild] Output rustdoc-json-types docs )
- #81849 (Expand the docs for ops::ControlFlow a bit)
- #81876 (parser: Fix panic in 'const impl' recovery)
- #81882 (⬆️ rust-analyzer)
- #81888 (Fix pretty printer macro_rules with semicolon.)
- #81896 (Remove outdated comment in windows' mutex.rs)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove outdated comment in windows' mutex.rs
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81250, this `Mutex` no longer falls back to the `ReentrantMutex` implementation, so this comment is no longer relevant.
Expand the docs for ops::ControlFlow a bit
Since I was writing some examples for an RFC anyway.
And I almost made the mistake of reordering the variants, so added a note and a test about that.
Prefer match over combinators to make some Box methods inlineable
Hopefully this patch would make two snippets generated identical code: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/fjrj4E>.
libtest: allow multiple filters
Libtest ignores any filters after the first. This changes it so that if multiple filters are passed, it will test against all of them.
This also affects compiletest to do the same.
Closes#30422
BTree: remove Ord bound where it is absent elsewhere
Some btree methods don't really need an Ord bound and don't have one, while some methods that more obviously don't need it, do have one.
An example of the former is `iter`, even though it explicitly exposes the work of the Ord implementation (["sorted by key"](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/struct.BTreeMap.html#method.iter) - but I'm not suggesting it should have the Ord bound). An example of the latter is `new`, which doesn't involve any keys whatsoever.
Stabilize remaining integer methods as `const fn`
This pull request stabilizes the following methods as `const fn`:
- `i*::checked_div`
- `i*::checked_div_euclid`
- `i*::checked_rem`
- `i*::checked_rem_euclid`
- `i*::div_euclid`
- `i*::overflowing_div`
- `i*::overflowing_div_euclid`
- `i*::overflowing_rem`
- `i*::overflowing_rem_euclid`
- `i*::rem_euclid`
- `i*::wrapping_div`
- `i*::wrapping_div_euclid`
- `i*::wrapping_rem`
- `i*::wrapping_rem_euclid`
- `u*::checked_div`
- `u*::checked_div_euclid`
- `u*::checked_rem`
- `u*::checked_rem_euclid`
- `u*::div_euclid`
- `u*::overflowing_div`
- `u*::overflowing_div_euclid`
- `u*::overflowing_rem`
- `u*::overflowing_rem_euclid`
- `u*::rem_euclid`
- `u*::wrapping_div`
- `u*::wrapping_div_euclid`
- `u*::wrapping_rem`
- `u*::wrapping_rem_euclid`
These can all be implemented on the current stable (1.49). There are two unstable details: const likely/unlikely and unchecked division/remainder. Both of these are for optimizations, and are in no way required to make the methods function; there is no exposure of these details publicly. Per comments below, it seems best practice is to stabilize the intrinsics. As such, `intrinsics::unchecked_div` and `intrinsics::unchecked_rem` have been stabilized as `const` as part of this pull request as well. The methods themselves remain unstable.
I believe part of the reason these were not stabilized previously was the behavior around division by 0 and modulo 0. After testing on nightly, the diagnostic for something like `const _: i8 = 5i8 % 0i8;` is similar to that of `const _: i8 = 5i8.rem_euclid(0i8);` (assuming the appropriate feature flag is enabled). As such, I believe these methods are ready to be stabilized as `const fn`.
This pull request represents the final methods mentioned in #53718. As such, this PR closes#53718.
`@rustbot` modify labels to +A-const-fn, +T-libs
expand/resolve: Turn `#[derive]` into a regular macro attribute
This PR turns `#[derive]` into a regular attribute macro declared in libcore and defined in `rustc_builtin_macros`, like it was previously done with other "active" attributes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62086, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62735 and other PRs.
This PR is also a continuation of #65252, #69870 and other PRs linked from them, which layed the ground for converting `#[derive]` specifically.
`#[derive]` still asks `rustc_resolve` to resolve paths inside `derive(...)`, and `rustc_expand` gets those resolution results through some backdoor (which I'll try to address later), but otherwise `#[derive]` is treated as any other macro attributes, which simplifies the resolution-expansion infra pretty significantly.
The change has several observable effects on language and library.
Some of the language changes are **feature-gated** by [`feature(macro_attributes_in_derive_output)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81119).
#### Library
- `derive` is now available through standard library as `{core,std}::prelude::v1::derive`.
#### Language
- `derive` now goes through name resolution, so it can now be renamed - `use derive as my_derive; #[my_derive(Debug)] struct S;`.
- `derive` now goes through name resolution, so this resolution can fail in corner cases. Crater found one such regression, where import `use foo as derive` goes into a cycle with `#[derive(Something)]`.
- **[feature-gated]** `#[derive]` is now expanded as any other attributes in left-to-right order. This allows to remove the restriction on other macro attributes following `#[derive]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues/566). The following macro attributes become a part of the derive's input (this is not a change, non-macro attributes following `#[derive]` were treated in the same way previously).
- `#[derive]` is now expanded as any other attributes in left-to-right order. This means two derive attributes `#[derive(Foo)] #[derive(Bar)]` are now expanded separately rather than together. It doesn't generally make difference, except for esoteric cases. For example `#[derive(Foo)]` can now produce an import bringing `Bar` into scope, but previously both `Foo` and `Bar` were required to be resolved before expanding any of them.
- **[feature-gated]** `#[derive()]` (with empty list in parentheses) actually becomes useful. For historical reasons `#[derive]` *fully configures* its input, eagerly evaluating `cfg` everywhere in its target, for example on fields.
Expansion infra doesn't do that for other attributes, but now when macro attributes attributes are allowed to be written after `#[derive]`, it means that derive can *fully configure* items for them.
```rust
#[derive()]
#[my_attr]
struct S {
#[cfg(FALSE)] // this field in removed by `#[derive()]` and not observed by `#[my_attr]`
field: u8
}
```
- `#[derive]` on some non-item targets is now prohibited. This was accidentally allowed as noop in the past, but was warned about since early 2018 (#50092), despite that crater found a few such cases in unmaintained crates.
- Derive helper attributes used before their introduction are now reported with a deprecation lint. This change is long overdue (since macro modularization, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52226#issuecomment-422605033), but it was hard to do without fixing expansion order for derives. The deprecation is tracked by #79202.
```rust
#[trait_helper] // warning: derive helper attribute is used before it is introduced
#[derive(Trait)]
struct S {}
```
Crater analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79078#issuecomment-731436821
Add a note about the correctness and the effect on unsafe code to the `ExactSizeIterator` docs
As it is a safe trait it does not provide any guarantee that the
returned length is correct and as such unsafe code must not rely on it.
That's why `TrustedLen` exists.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81739
Upgrade wasm32 image to Ubuntu 20.04
This switches the wasm32 image, which is used to test
wasm32-unknown-emscripten, to Ubuntu 20.04. While at it, enable
most of the excluded tests, as they seem to work fine with some
minor fixes.
bors
