```
note: required for `B<C>` to implement `Copy`
--> $DIR/deriving-copyclone.rs:9:10
|
LL | #[derive(Copy, Clone)]
| ^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound introduced in this `derive` macro
LL | struct B<T> {
| - would need to be `Copy`
```
When encountering a bound coming from a derive macro, suggest manual impl of the trait.
Use the span for the specific param when adding bounds in builtin derive macros, so the diagnostic will point at them as well as the derive macro itself.
```
error[E0277]: can't compare `SomeNode` with `SomeNode`
--> f29.rs:24:15
|
24 | accept_eq(&node);
| --------- ^^^^^ no implementation for `SomeNode == SomeNode`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: -Ztrack-diagnostics: created at compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/traits/fulfillment_errors.rs:279:39
= help: the trait `PartialEq` is not implemented for `SomeNode`
note: required for `Id<SomeNode>` to implement `PartialEq`
--> f29.rs:3:10
|
3 | #[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
| ^^^^^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound introduced in this `derive` macro
4 | pub struct Id<T>(PhantomData<T>);
| -
= help: consider manually implementing `PartialEq` to avoid undesired bounds
note: required by a bound in `accept_eq`
--> f29.rs:15:23
|
15 | fn accept_eq(_: &impl PartialEq) { }
| ^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `accept_eq`
help: consider annotating `SomeNode` with `#[derive(PartialEq)]`
|
13 + #[derive(PartialEq)]
14 | struct SomeNode();
|
```
Better handle when trying to iterate on a `Range` of a type that isn't `Step`
Mention when a trait bound corresponds to an unstable trait.
Mention `Range` when `Step` bound is unment, and explain that only some std types impl `Iterator` for `Range`.
CC rust-lang/rust#151026
Currently all core and std macros are automatically added to the prelude
via #[macro_use]. However a situation arose where we want to add a new macro
`assert_matches` but don't want to pull it into the standard prelude for
compatibility reasons. By explicitly exporting the macros found in the core and
std crates we get to decide on a per macro basis and can later add them via
the rust_20xx preludes.
Add regression test for issue #99173Closerust-lang/rust#99173.
Adds a regression test for rust-lang/rust#99173, which was an ICE that occurred when a proc-macro generated code that invoked another proc-macro returning an empty `TokenStream`.
add regression test for `proc_macro` error subdiagnostics
The previous ICE was already fixed by rust-lang/rust#148188, but no test was added at that time.
Closesrust-lang/rust#145305.
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/macro-span-caller-replacement.rs:5:17
|
LL | s = format!("{arg}");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `&str`, found `String`
...
LL | macro_with_format!();
| -------------------- in this macro invocation
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `format` which comes from the expansion of the macro `macro_with_format` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
unstable proc_macro tracked::* rename/restructure
Picking up what should be the uncontroversial part of rust-lang/rust#87173 (closed due to inactivity over two years ago).
Part of rust-lang/rust#99515.
- move `proc_macro::tracked_env::var` to `proc_macro::tracked::env_var`
- move `proc_macro::tracked_path::path` to `proc_macro::tracked::path`
- change the argument of `proc_macro::tracked::path` from `AsRef<str>` to `AsRef<Path>`.
Warn on unused_attributes in uitests
r? ```@jdonszelmann```
Because:
- unused_attributes warnings are usually actual mistakes, rather than just unused code, and we want to notify test writers they may be accidentally making a mistake
- Because the lint was allowed by default previously, we missed real bugs, because the test coverage is worse
1. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147417
2. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147411
Remove `no-remap-src-base` from tests
Previously in the `//`-compiletest-directive times, `no-remap-src-base` was implemented as a special `no-*` directive parsing. In the migration from `//` -> `//`@`,` the `// no-remap-src-base` directive was lost, most likely because it had no effect -- the default is not remapping `src-base`.
So remove occurrences of `no-remap-src-base`, as these are not valid directives.
r? `@Zalathar` (since we discussed this on discord, or compiler)
Previously in the `//`-compiletest-directive times, this was implemented
as a special `no-*` directive parsing. In the migration from `//` ->
`//@`, the `// no-remap-src-base` directive was lost, most likely
because it had no effect -- the default is not remapping `src-base`.
So remove occurrences of `no-remap-src-base`, as these are not valid
directives.
Don’t suggest foreign `doc(hidden)` types in "the following other types implement trait" diagnostics
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132024.
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics T-compiler
We'll still error due to the `opt_bad_ty` of `method_autoderef_steps`.
This slightly worsens the span of `infer_var.method()` which is now the
same as for `Box::new(infer_var).method()`.
Unlike `structurally_resolve_type`, `probe_op` does not check whether
the infcx is already tainted, so this results in 2 previously not emitted
errors.
Esteban Küber