Check `x86_64` size assertions on `aarch64`, too
(Context: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Checking.20size.20assertions.20on.20aarch64.3F)
Currently the compiler has around 30 sets of `static_assert_size!` for various size-critical data structures (e.g. various IR nodes), guarded by `#[cfg(all(target_arch = "x86_64", target_pointer_width = "64"))]`.
(Presumably this cfg avoids having to maintain separate size values for 32-bit targets and unusual 64-bit targets. Apparently it may have been necessary before the i128/u128 alignment changes, too.)
This is slightly incovenient for people on aarch64 workstations (e.g. Macs), because the assertions normally aren't checked until we push to a PR. So this PR adds `aarch64` to the `#[cfg(..)]` guarding all of those assertions in the compiler.
---
Implemented with a simple find/replace. Verified by manually inspecting each `static_assert_size!` in `compiler/`, and checking that either the replacement succeeded, or adding aarch64 wouldn't have been appropriate.
Better reporting on generic argument mismatchs
This allows better reporting as per issue #116615 .
If you have a function:
```
fn foo(a: T, b: T) {}
```
and call it like so:
```
foo(1, 2.)
```
it'll give improved error reported similar to the following:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> generic-mismatch-reporting-issue-116615.rs:6:12
|
6 | foo(1, 2.);
| --- - ^^ expected integer, found floating-point number
| | |
| | expected argument `b` to be an integer because that argument needs to match the type of this parameter
| arguments to this function are incorrect
|
note: function defined here
--> generic-mismatch-reporting-issue-116615.rs:1:4
|
1 | fn foo<T>(a: T, b: T) {}
| ^^^ - ---- ----
| | | |
| | | this parameter needs to match the integer type of `a`
| | `b` needs to match the type of this parameter
| `a` and `b` all reference this parameter T
```
Open question, do we need to worry about error message translation into other languages? Not sure what the status of that is in Rust.
NB: Needs some checking over and some tests have altered that need sanity checking, but overall this is starting to get somewhere now. Will take out of draft PR status when this has been done, raising now to allow feedback at this stage, probably 90% ready.
conditionally ignore fatal diagnostic in the SilentEmitter
This change is primarily meant to allow rustfmt to ignore all diagnostics when using the `SilentEmitter`. Back in #121301 the `SilentEmitter` was shared between rustc and rustfmt. This changed rustfmt's behavior from ignoring all diagnostic to emitting fatal diagnostics, which lead to https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6109.
These changes allow rustfmt to maintain its previous behaviour when using the `SilentEmitter`, while allowing rustc code to still emit fatal diagnostics.
This change is primarily meant to allow rustfmt to ignore all
diagnostics when using the `SilentEmitter`. Back in PR 121301 the
`SilentEmitter` was shared between rustc and rustfmt. This changed
rustfmt's behavior from ignoring all diagnostic to emitting fatal
diagnostics.
These changes allow rustfmt to maintain it's previous behaviour when
using the SilentEmitter, while allowing rustc code to still emit fatal
diagnostics.
- Firstly get all the information about generics matching out of the HIR
- Secondly the labelling for the function is more coherent now
- Lastly a few error message improvements
Enable creating backtraces via -Ztreat-err-as-bug when stashing errors
r? `@nnethercote`
Otherwise I can't debug stashed errors because I can't find their source
Store backtrace for `must_produce_diag`
This makes it significantly easier to debug a `must_produce_diag` ICE, since we have no other way to know where the heck the bug originates from.
Backtrace rendering kinda sucks right now since we're just printing it in the panic message; happy to apply some suggestions to make it prettier or reuse other bug printing machinery, but also don't want to iterate too much on the rendering since this really is just for debug purposes.
r? nnethercote
Rework `untranslatable_diagnostic` lint
Currently it only checks calls to functions marked with `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]`. This PR changes it to check calls to any function with an `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` parameter. This greatly improves its coverage and doesn't rely on people remembering to add `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]`. It also lets us add `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` to a number of functions that don't have an `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>`, such as `Diag::span`.
r? ``@davidtwco``
Prior to the previous commit, `#[rust_lint_diagnostics]` attributes
could only be used on methods with an `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagMessage>`
parameter. But there are many other nearby diagnostic methods (e.g.
`Diag::span`) that don't take such a parameter and should have the
attribute.
This commit adds the missing attribute to these `Diag` methods. This
requires adding some missing
`#[allow(rustc::diagnostic_outside_of_impl)]` markers at call sites to
these methods.
From `impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>` to `impl Into<Cow<'static, str>>`.
Because these functions don't produce user-facing output and we don't
want their strings to be translated.
Note that `self.suppressed_expected_diag` is no longer set for
`ForceWarning`, which is good. Nor is `TRACK_DIAGNOSTIC` called for
`Allow`, which is also good.
It results in a tiny bit of duplication (another
`self.treat_next_err_as_bug()` condition) but I think it's worth it to
get more code into the main `match`.
By just emitting them immediately, because it does happen in practice,
when errors are downgraded to delayed bugs.
We already had one case in `lint.rs` where we handled this at the
callsite. This commit changes things so it's handled within
`stash_diagnostic` instead, because #121812 identified a second case,
and it's possible there are more.
Fixes#121812.
León Orell Valerian Liehr