Idiomatic improvements to IP method
Since match ergonomics and slice patterns are stable this might be more idiomatic modern Rust implementations of these methods? Or well, slice patterns with `..` are not stabilized yet, so maybe we want to specify all fields but with `_`?
Don't panic on std::env::vars() when env is null.
Fixes#53200.
Reviewer(s):
* Do I need to do any `#[cfg()]` here?
* Is this use of libc ok for a dev-dependency?
Add links to std::char::REPLACEMENT_CHARACTER from docs.
There are a few places where we mention the replacement character in the
docs, and it could be helpful for users to utilize the constant which is
available in the standard library, so let’s link to it!
Show that Command can be reused and remodified
The prior documentation did not make it clear this was possible.
I wanted to make the `list_dir` example work on Windows, but I don't know if passing "/" will error or show the root of the current volume (e.g. `C:`).
r? @GuillaumeGomez
There are a few places where we mention the replacement character in the
docs, and it could be helpful for users to utilize the constant which is
available in the standard library, so let’s link to it!
Rollup of 15 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #52773 (Avoid unnecessary pattern matching against Option and Result)
- #53082 (Fix doc link (again))
- #53094 (Automatically expand section if url id point to one of its component)
- #53106 (atomic ordering docs)
- #53110 (Account for --remap-path-prefix in save-analysis)
- #53116 (NetBSD: fix signedess of char)
- #53179 (Whitelist wasm32 simd128 target feature)
- #53183 (Suggest comma when missing in macro call)
- #53207 (Add individual docs for rotate_{left, right})
- #53211 ([nll] enable feature(nll) on various crates for bootstrap)
- #53214 ([nll] enable feature(nll) on various crates for bootstrap: part 2)
- #53215 (Slightly refactor syntax_ext/format)
- #53217 (inline some short functions)
- #53219 ([nll] enable feature(nll) on various crates for bootstrap: part 3)
- #53222 (A few cleanups for rustc_target)
clarify partially initialized Mutex issues
Using a `sys_common::mutex::Mutex` without calling `init` is dangerous, and yet there are some places that do this. I tried to find all of them and add an appropriate comment about reentrancy.
I found two places where (I think) reentrancy can actually occur, and was not able to come up with an argument for why this is okay. Someone who knows `io::lazy` and/or `sys_common::at_exit_imp` should have a careful look at this.
Remove references to `StaticMutex` which got removed a while ago
`StaticMutex` got removed two years ago with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/34705, but still got referenced in some comments and even an error explanation.
Specify reentrancy gurantees of `Once::call_once`
I don't think the docs are clear about what happens in the following code
```rust
static INIT: Once = ONCE_INIT;
INIT.call_once(|| INIT.call_once(|| println!("huh?")));
```
[Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=15dde1f68a6ede263c7250c36977eade&version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2015)
Let's "specify" the behavior to make it clear that the current behavior (deadlock I think?) is not a strict guarantee.
bors