Port `#[rustc_legacy_const_generics]` to use attribute parser
Small PR that ports the `#[rustc_legacy_const_generics]` to use the new attribute parser!
r? JonathanBrouwer
Introduces `BackendRepr::ScalableVector` corresponding to scalable
vector types annotated with `repr(scalable)` which lowers to a scalable
vector type in LLVM.
Co-authored-by: Jamie Cunliffe <Jamie.Cunliffe@arm.com>
Extend parsing of `ReprOptions` with `rustc_scalable_vector(N)` which
optionally accepts a single literal integral value - the base multiple of
lanes that are in a scalable vector. Can only be applied to structs.
Co-authored-by: Jamie Cunliffe <Jamie.Cunliffe@arm.com>
Externally implementable items
Supersedes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140010
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125418
Getting started:
```rust
#![feature(eii)]
#[eii(eii1)]
pub fn decl1(x: u64)
// body optional (it's the default)
{
println!("default {x}");
}
// in another crate, maybe
#[eii1]
pub fn decl2(x: u64) {
println!("explicit {x}");
}
fn main() {
decl1(4);
}
```
- tiny perf regression, underlying issue makes multiple things in the compiler slow, not just EII, planning to solve those separately.
- No codegen_gcc support, they don't have bindings for weak symbols yet but could
- No windows support yet for weak definitions
This PR merges the implementation of EII for just llvm + not windows, doesn't yet contain like a new panic handler implementation or alloc handler. With this implementation, it would support implementing the panic handler in terms of EII already since it requires no default implementation so no weak symbols
The PR has been open in various forms for about a year now, but I feel that having some implementation merged to build upon
Overhaul filename handling for cross-compiler consistency
This PR overhauls the way we handle filenames in the compiler and `rmeta` in order to achieve achieve cross-compiler consistency (ie. having the same path no matter if the filename was created in the current compiler session or is coming from `rmeta`).
This is required as some parts of the compiler rely on consistent paths for the soundness of generated code (see rust-lang/rust#148328).
In order to achieved consistency multiple steps are being taken by this PR:
- by making `RealFileName` immutable
- by only having `SourceMap::to_real_filename` create `RealFileName`
- currently `RealFileName` can be created from any `Path` and are remapped afterwards, which creates consistency issue
- by also making `RealFileName` holds it's working directory, embeddable name and the remapped scopes
- this removes the need for a `Session`, to know the current(!) scopes and cwd, which is invalid as they may not be equal to the scopes used when creating the filename
In order for `SourceMap::to_real_filename` to know which scopes to apply `FilePathMapping` now takes the current remapping scopes to apply, which makes `FileNameDisplayPreference` and company useless and are removed.
This PR is split-up in multiple commits (unfortunately not atomic), but should help review the changes.
Unblocks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/147611
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/148328
This commit refactors `SourceMap` and most importantly `RealFileName` to
make it self-contained in order to achieve cross-compiler consistency.
This is achieved:
- by making `RealFileName` immutable
- by only having `SourceMap::to_real_filename` create `RealFileName`
- by also making `RealFileName` holds it's working directory,
it's embeddable name and the remapped scopes
- by making most `FileName` and `RealFileName` methods take a scope as
an argument
In order for `SourceMap::to_real_filename` to know which scopes to apply
`FilePathMapping` now takes the current remapping scopes to apply, which
makes `FileNameDisplayPreference` and company useless and are removed.
The scopes type `RemapPathScopeComponents` was moved from
`rustc_session::config` to `rustc_span`.
The previous system for scoping the local/remapped filenames
`RemapFileNameExt::for_scope` is no longer useful as it's replaced by
methods on `FileName` and `RealFileName`.
Port `doc` attributes to new attribute API
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229.
This PR ports the `doc` attributes to the new attribute API. However, there are things that will need to be fixed in a follow-up:
* Some part of `cfg_old.rs` are likely unused now, so they should be removed.
* Not all error/lints are emitted at the same time anymore, making them kinda less useful considering that you need to run and fix rustc/rustdoc multiple times to get through all of them.
* For coherency with the other attribute errors, I didn't modify the default output too much, meaning that we have some new messages now. I'll likely come back to that to check if the previous ones were better in a case-by-case approach.
* `doc(test(attr(...)))` is handled in a horrifying manner currently. Until we can handle it correctly with the `Attribute` system, it'll remain that thing we're all very ashamed of. 😈
* A type in rustdoc got its size increased, I'll check the impact on performance. But in any case, I plan to improve it in a follow-up so should be "ok".
* Because of error reporting, some fields of `Doc` are suboptimal, like `inline` which instead of being an `Option` is a `ThinVec` because we report the error later on. Part of the things I'm not super happy about but can be postponed to future me.
* In `src/librustdoc/clean/cfg.rs`, the `pub(crate) fn parse(cfg: &MetaItemInner) -> Result<Cfg, InvalidCfgError> {` function should be removed once `cfg_trace` has been ported to new `cfg` API.
* Size of type `DocFragment` went from 32 to 48. Would be nice to get it back to 32.
* ``malformed `doc` attribute input`` wasn't meant for so many candidates, should be improved.
* See how many of the checks in `check_attr` we can move to attribute parsing
* Port target checking to be in the attribute parser completely
* Fix target checking for `doc(alias)` on fields & patterns
And finally, once this PR is merged, I plan to finally stabilize `doc_cfg` feature. :)
cc `@jdonszelmann`
r? `@JonathanBrouwer`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#148052 (Stabilize `const_mul_add`)
- rust-lang/rust#149386 (Display funding link in the github overview)
- rust-lang/rust#149489 (Experimentally add *heterogeneous* `try` blocks)
- rust-lang/rust#149764 (Make `--print=backend-has-zstd` work by default on any backend)
- rust-lang/rust#149838 (Build auxiliary in pretty tests)
- rust-lang/rust#149839 (Use `PointeeSized` bound for `TrivialClone` impls)
- rust-lang/rust#149846 (Statically require links to an issue or the edition guide for all FCWs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Move `struct Placeholder<T>`
r? ghost
Couple of issues I've encountered;
- `compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/region_constraints/mod.rs` `GenericKind` I can't call `write!(f, "{p}")` due to error 1. Which looks like I may need to implement `Lift` for `Placeholder`?
- Using the `define_print_and_forward_display!` for `ty::PlaceholderType` caused error 2, as I've moved the struct it no longer exists in the crate. I suspect because I'm not using that macro it causes the error for `GenericKind`
<details>
<summary>Error 1</summary>
```
error: lifetime may not live long enough
--> compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/region_constraints/mod.rs:672:38
|
668 | impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for GenericKind<'tcx> {
| ---- lifetime `'tcx` defined here
...
672 | GenericKind::Placeholder(ref p) => write!(f, "{p}"),
| ^^^^^ assignment requires that `'tcx` must outlive `'static`
|
= note: requirement occurs because of the type `rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt<'_>`, which makes the generic argument `'_` invariant
= note: the struct `rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt<'tcx>` is invariant over the parameter `'tcx`
= help: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/subtyping.html> for more information about variance
error: implementation of `Lift` is not general enough
--> compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/region_constraints/mod.rs:672:38
|
672 | GenericKind::Placeholder(ref p) => write!(f, "{p}"),
| ^^^^^ implementation of `Lift` is not general enough
|
= note: `Lift<rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt<'0>>` would have to be implemented for the type `rustc_type_ir::Placeholder<rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt<'_>, BoundTy>`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Lift<rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt<'1>>` is actually implemented for the type `rustc_type_ir::Placeholder<rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt<'1>, BoundTy>`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: implementation of `Print` is not general enough
--> compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/region_constraints/mod.rs:672:38
|
672 | GenericKind::Placeholder(ref p) => write!(f, "{p}"),
| ^^^^^ implementation of `Print` is not general enough
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Error 2</summary>
```
error[E0117]: only traits defined in the current crate can be implemented for arbitrary types
--> compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/print/pretty.rs:3060:38
|
3057 | / macro_rules! forward_display_to_print {
3058 | | ($($ty:ty),+) => {
3059 | | // Some of the $ty arguments may not actually use 'tcx
3060 | | $(#[allow(unused_lifetimes)] impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for $ty {
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
... |
3072 | | };
3073 | | }
| |_- in this expansion of `forward_display_to_print!`
...
3093 | / forward_display_to_print! {
3094 | | ty::Region<'tcx>,
3095 | | Ty<'tcx>,
3096 | | &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
3097 | | ty::Const<'tcx>,
3098 | | &'tcx ty::PlaceholderType<'tcx>
| | ------------------------------- `rustc_type_ir::Placeholder` is not defined in the current crate
3099 | | }
| |_- in this macro invocation
|
= note: impl doesn't have any local type before any uncovered type parameters
= note: for more information see https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/implementations.html#orphan-rules
= note: define and implement a trait or new type instead
error: implementation of `Lift` is not general enough
--> compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/print/pretty.rs:3060:38
|
3057 | / macro_rules! forward_display_to_print {
3058 | | ($($ty:ty),+) => {
3059 | | // Some of the $ty arguments may not actually use 'tcx
3060 | | $(#[allow(unused_lifetimes)] impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for $ty {
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ implementation of `Lift` is not general enough
... |
3072 | | };
3073 | | }
| |_- in this expansion of `forward_display_to_print!`
...
3093 | / forward_display_to_print! {
3094 | | ty::Region<'tcx>,
3095 | | Ty<'tcx>,
3096 | | &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
3097 | | ty::Const<'tcx>,
3098 | | &'tcx ty::PlaceholderType<'tcx>
3099 | | }
| |_- in this macro invocation
|
= note: `Lift<context::TyCtxt<'0>>` would have to be implemented for the type `rustc_type_ir::Placeholder<context::TyCtxt<'tcx>, BoundTy>`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Lift<context::TyCtxt<'1>>` is actually implemented for the type `rustc_type_ir::Placeholder<context::TyCtxt<'1>, BoundTy>`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: implementation of `print::Print` is not general enough
--> compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/print/pretty.rs:3060:38
|
3057 | / macro_rules! forward_display_to_print {
3058 | | ($($ty:ty),+) => {
3059 | | // Some of the $ty arguments may not actually use 'tcx
3060 | | $(#[allow(unused_lifetimes)] impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for $ty {
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ implementation of `print::Print` is not general enough
... |
3072 | | };
3073 | | }
| |_- in this expansion of `forward_display_to_print!`
...
3093 | / forward_display_to_print! {
3094 | | ty::Region<'tcx>,
3095 | | Ty<'tcx>,
3096 | | &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
3097 | | ty::Const<'tcx>,
3098 | | &'tcx ty::PlaceholderType<'tcx>
3099 | | }
| |_- in this macro invocation
|
= note: `print::Print<'0, print::pretty::FmtPrinter<'a, '0>>` would have to be implemented for the type `rustc_type_ir::Placeholder<context::TyCtxt<'tcx>, BoundTy>`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `print::Print<'1, print::pretty::FmtPrinter<'a, 'tcx>>` is actually implemented for the type `rustc_type_ir::Placeholder<context::TyCtxt<'1>, BoundTy>`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: specializing impl repeats parameter `'tcx`
--> compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/print/pretty.rs:3060:38
|
3057 | / macro_rules! forward_display_to_print {
3058 | | ($($ty:ty),+) => {
3059 | | // Some of the $ty arguments may not actually use 'tcx
3060 | | $(#[allow(unused_lifetimes)] impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for $ty {
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
... |
3072 | | };
3073 | | }
| |_- in this expansion of `forward_display_to_print!`
...
3093 | / forward_display_to_print! {
3094 | | ty::Region<'tcx>,
3095 | | Ty<'tcx>,
3096 | | &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
3097 | | ty::Const<'tcx>,
3098 | | &'tcx ty::PlaceholderType<'tcx>
3099 | | }
| |_- in this macro invocation
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&Placeholder<TyCtxt<'tcx>, BoundTy>: Lift<...>` is not satisfied
--> compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/print/pretty.rs:3064:30
|
3057 | / macro_rules! forward_display_to_print {
3058 | | ($($ty:ty),+) => {
3059 | | // Some of the $ty arguments may not actually use 'tcx
3060 | | $(#[allow(unused_lifetimes)] impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for $ty {
... |
3064 | | tcx.lift(*self)
| | ---- ^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound
| | |
| | required by a bound introduced by this call
... |
3072 | | };
3073 | | }
| |_- in this expansion of `forward_display_to_print!`
...
3093 | / forward_display_to_print! {
3094 | | ty::Region<'tcx>,
3095 | | Ty<'tcx>,
3096 | | &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
3097 | | ty::Const<'tcx>,
3098 | | &'tcx ty::PlaceholderType<'tcx>
3099 | | }
| |_- in this macro invocation
|
= help: the trait `Lift<context::TyCtxt<'_>>` is not implemented for `&rustc_type_ir::Placeholder<context::TyCtxt<'tcx>, BoundTy>`
note: required by a bound in `context::TyCtxt::<'tcx>::lift`
--> compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/context.rs:1807:20
|
1807 | pub fn lift<T: Lift<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(self, value: T) -> Option<T::Lifted> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `TyCtxt::<'tcx>::lift`
= note: the full name for the type has been written to '/home/jambar02/Documents/arm/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/rustc_middle-16e5c44041028d8b.long-type-3843651570422266958.txt'
= note: consider using `--verbose` to print the full type name to the console
help: consider dereferencing here
|
3064 | tcx.lift(**self)
| +
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/print/pretty.rs:3064:21
|
3057 | / macro_rules! forward_display_to_print {
3058 | | ($($ty:ty),+) => {
3059 | | // Some of the $ty arguments may not actually use 'tcx
3060 | | $(#[allow(unused_lifetimes)] impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for $ty {
... |
3064 | |/ tcx.lift(*self)
3065 | || .expect("could not lift for printing")
| ||______________________________________________________________^ cannot infer type
... |
3072 | | };
3073 | | }
| |__- in this expansion of `forward_display_to_print!`
...
3093 | / forward_display_to_print! {
3094 | | ty::Region<'tcx>,
3095 | | Ty<'tcx>,
3096 | | &'tcx ty::List<ty::PolyExistentialPredicate<'tcx>>,
3097 | | ty::Const<'tcx>,
3098 | | &'tcx ty::PlaceholderType<'tcx>
3099 | | }
| |_- in this macro invocation
```
</details>
Fix `name()` functions for local defs in rustc_public
This change fixes the behavior of the `name()` function for `CrateDef` and `Instance` which should return absolute path of items. For local items, the crate name was missing.
This resolves: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/109
Move attribute lints to `rustc_lint`
This PR changes two things:
- This decouples the `AttributeLintKind` from the `Lint` it is emitted in. `cx.emit_lint` now takes both as an argument, rather than inferring the `Lint` from the `AttributeLintKind`. This is nice because:
- It allows us to remove `AttributeLintKind::InvalidMacroExportArguments`
- It allows us to move the choice between `USELESS_DEPRECATED` and `UNUSED_ATTRIBUTES` out of the lint emitting code
- It allows the next change:
- This moves `AttributeLintKind` to `rustc_lint_defs`, and the decorating code to `rustc_lint`. This is nice because:
- It allows attribute lint decorating code to access the TypeCtxt, which unblocks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/149215
- It might allow most early buffered attribute lints to become dyn lint diagnostics in the future, as in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/147634
- It deduplicates `IllFormedAttributeInput`
This PR does not change observable output of the compiler, as can be seen by no uitests being affected.
r? `@jdonszelmann`
misc coercion cleanups and handle safety correctly
r? lcnr
### "remove normalize call"
Fixesrust-lang/rust#132765
If the normalization fails we would sometimes get a `TypeError` containing inference variables created inside of the probe used by coercion. These would then get leaked out causing ICEs in diagnostics logic
### "leak check and lub for closure<->closure coerce-lubs of same defids"
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/233
```rust
fn peculiar() -> impl Fn(u8) -> u8 {
return |x| x + 1
}
```
the `|x| x + 1` expr has a type of `Closure(?31t)` which we wind up inferring the RPIT to. The `CoerceMany` `ret_coercion` for the whole `peculiar` typeck has an expected type of `RPIT` (unnormalized). When we type check the `return |x| x + 1` expr we go from the never type to `Closure(?31t)` which then participates in the `ret_coercion` giving us a `coerce-lub(RPIT, Closure(?31t))`.
Normalizing `RPIT` gives us some `Closure(?50t)` where `?31t` and `?50t` have been unified with `?31t` as the root var. `resolve_vars_if_possible` doesn't resolve infer vars to their roots so these wind up with different structural identities so the fast path doesn't apply and we fall back to coercing to a `fn` ptr. cc rust-lang/rust#147193 which also fixes this
New solver probably just gets more inference variables here because canonicalization + generally different approach to normalization of opaques. Idk :3
### FCP worthy stuffy
there are some other FCP worthy things but they're in my FCP comment which also contains some analysis of the breaking nature of the previously listed changes in this PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/148602#issuecomment-3503497467
The `name()` function specifies that it returns absolute path of items,
however it wasn't including the crate name for local items.
This change fixes that.
This was reported here: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/109
const validation: remove check for mutable refs in final value of const
This check rejects code that is not necessarily UB, e.g. a mutable ref to a `static mut` that is very carefully used correctly. That led to us having to describe it in the Reference, which uncovered just how ad-hoc this check is (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues/2074).
Even without this check, we still reject things like
```rust
const C: &mut i32 = &mut 0;
```
This is rejected by const checking -- the part of the frontend that looks at the source code and says whether it is allowed in const context. In the Reference, this restriction is explained [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/const_eval.html#r-const-eval.const-expr.borrows).
So, the check during validation is just a safety net. And it is already a safety net with gaping holes since we only check `&mut T`, not `&UnsafeCell<T>`, due to the fact that we promote some immutable values that have `!Freeze` type so `&!Freeze` actually can occur in the final value of a const.
So... it may be time for me to acknowledge that the "mutable ref in final value of const" check is a cure that's worth than the disease. Nobody asked for that check, I just added it because I was worried about soundness issues when we allow mutable references in constants. Originally it was much stricter, but I had to slowly relax it to its current form to prevent t from firing on code we intend to allow. In the end there are only 3 tests left that trigger this error, and they are all just constants containing references to mutable statics -- not the safest code in the world, but also not so bad that we have to spend a lot of time devising a core language limitation and associated Reference wording to prevent it from ever happening.
So... `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` `@rust-lang/lang` I propose that we allow code like this
```rust
static mut S: i32 = 3;
const C2: &'static mut i32 = unsafe { &mut * &raw mut S };
```
`@theemathas` would be great if you could try to poke a hole into this. ;)
Fix issue with callsite inline attribute not being applied sometimes.
If the calling function had more target features enabled than the callee than the attribute wasn't being applied as the arguments for the check had been swapped round. Also includes target features that are part of the global set as the warning was checking those but when adding the attribute they were not checked.
Add a codegen-llvm test to check that the attribute is actually applied as previously only the warning was being checked.
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#145574
If the calling function had more target features enabled than the
callee than the attribute wasn't being applied as the arguments for
the check had been swapped round. Also includes target features that
are part of the global set as the warning was checking those but when
adding the attribute they were not checked.
Add a codegen-llvm test to check that the attribute is actually
applied as previously only the warning was being checked.
Jacob Pratt