unix: Don't override existing SIGSEGV/BUS handlers
Although `stack_overflow::init` runs very early in the process, even
before `main`, there may already be signal handlers installed for things
like the address sanitizer. In that case, just leave it alone, and don't
bother trying to allocate our own signal stacks either.
Fixes#69524.
Permit attributes on 'if' expressions
Previously, attributes on 'if' expressions (e.g. `#[attr] if true {}`)
were disallowed during parsing. This made it impossible for macros to
perform any custom handling of such attributes (e.g. stripping them
away), since a compilation error would be emitted before they ever had a
chance to run.
This PR permits attributes on 'if' expressions ('if-attrs' from here on).
Both built-in attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`, `#[cfg]`) and proc-macro attributes are supported.
We still do *not* accept attributes on 'other parts' of an if-else
chain. That is, the following code snippet still fails to parse:
```rust
if true {} #[attr] else if false {} else #[attr] if false {} #[attr]
else {}
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68618
Although `stack_overflow::init` runs very early in the process, even
before `main`, there may already be signal handlers installed for things
like the address sanitizer. In that case, just leave it alone, and don't
bother trying to allocate our own signal stacks either.
Compile address sanitizer test with debuginfo
This makes error-pattern to match regardless of current
configuration of `rust.debuginfo-level-tests` in `config.toml`.
Change DIBuilderCreateEnumerator signature to match LLVM 9
* Change DIBuilderCreateEnumerator signature to match LLVM 9 C API.
* Use provided is unsigned flag when emitting enumerators.
Miri visitor: detect primitive types based on type, not layout (also, more tests)
I also converted the union-based transmutes to use `mem::transmute` for increased readability.
r? @eddyb @oli-obk
check_binding_alt_eq_ty: improve precision wrt. `if let`
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69452 -- this tweaks the `check_binding_alt_eq_ty` logic wrt. wording so that `if let` doesn't include "in this arm" (because there can only ever be one arm).
r? @estebank
Clean up unstable book
- #58402's feature was renamed to `tidy_test_never_used_anywhere_else` and it is now used for tidy only
- `read_initializer` link is wrong and the doc should be auto-generated so removed
- Add dummy doc for `link_cfg`
- Stop generating `compiler_builtins_lib` doc in favor of b8ccc0f8a6
- Make `rustc_attrs` tracking issue "None"
Turn trailing tokens in `assert!()` into hard errors
I didn't have time to build the compiler and thus edited the tests manually, I hope it will still pass.
Closes#69531
r? @Centril do you want to queue the Crater experiment?
On mismatched delimiters, only point at empty blocks that are in the same line
We point at empty blocks when we have mismatched braces to detect cases where editors auto insert `}` after writing `{`. Gate this to only the case where the entire span is in the same line so we never point at explicitly empty blocks.
resolve, inconsistent binding mode: tweak wording
Now that we can have e.g. `let Ok(x) | Err(x) = res;`, it's no longer appropriate to refer to "the same *match arm*", so let's tweak the wording.
r? @estebank
test(pattern): add tests for combinations of pattern features
Reference issue #67311
Tests combinations of the following pattern features:
- bindings_after_at
- or_patterns
- slice_patterns
- box_patterns
r? @Centril
Parse & reject postfix operators after casts
This adds an explicit error messages for when parsing `x as Type[0]` or similar expressions. Our add an extra parse case for parsing any postfix operator (dot, indexing, method calls, await) that triggers directly after parsing `as` expressions.
My friend and I worked on this together, but they're still deciding on a github username and thus I'm submitting this for both of us.
It will immediately error out, but will also provide the rest of the parser with a useful parse tree to deal with.
There's one decision we made in how this produces the parse tree. In the situation `&x as T[0]`, one could imagine this parsing as either `&((x as T)[0])` or `((&x) as T)[0]`. We chose the latter for ease of implementation, and as it seemed the most intuitive.
Feedback welcome! This is our first change to the parser section, and it might be completely horrible.
Fixes#35813.
When encountering an Item in a pat context, point at the item def
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/const-in-struct-pat.rs:8:17
|
LL | struct foo;
| ----------- `foo` defined here
...
LL | let Thing { foo } = t;
| ^^^ expected struct `std::string::String`, found struct `foo`
|
= note: `foo` is interpreted as a unit struct, not a new binding
help: you can bind the struct field to a different name
|
LL | let Thing { foo: other_foo } = t;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/const.rs:14:9
|
LL | const FOO: Foo = Foo{bar: 5};
| ----------------------------- constant defined here
...
LL | FOO => {},
| ^^^
| |
| expected `&Foo`, found struct `Foo`
| `FOO` is interpreted as a constant, not a new binding
| help: use different name to introduce a new binding: `other_foo`
```
Fix#55631, fix#48062, cc #42876.
Mazdak Farrokhzad