compiletest: Remove some vestigial code
The `check_lines` header is no longer parsed as a header, but instead inside the debuginfo tests. I believe this was changed in #13726.
These warnings were silently ignored since they did not appear in a
`.stderr` file and did not fail the test. With this change, warnings in
tests are denied, causing the tests to fail if they have warnings.
I will fix all the warnings that are now test failures next.
Add features gates for experimental asm features
This PR splits off parts of `asm!` into separate features because they are not ready for stabilization.
Specifically this adds:
- `asm_const` for `const` operands.
- `asm_sym` for `sym` operands.
- `asm_experimental_arch` for architectures other than x86, x86_64, arm, aarch64 and riscv.
r? `@nagisa`
Implement #85440 (Random test ordering)
This PR adds `--shuffle` and `--shuffle-seed` options to `libtest`. The options are similar to the [`-shuffle` option](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/c894b442d1e5e150ad33fa3ce13dbfab1c037b3a/src/testing/testing.go#L1482-L1499) that was recently added to Go.
Here are the relevant parts of the help message:
```
--shuffle Run tests in random order
--shuffle-seed SEED
Run tests in random order; seed the random number
generator with SEED
...
By default, the tests are run in alphabetical order. Use --shuffle or set
RUST_TEST_SHUFFLE to run the tests in random order. Pass the generated
"shuffle seed" to --shuffle-seed (or set RUST_TEST_SHUFFLE_SEED) to run the
tests in the same order again. Note that --shuffle and --shuffle-seed do not
affect whether the tests are run in parallel.
```
Is an RFC needed for this?
Since RFC 3052 soft deprecated the authors field anyway, hiding it from
crates.io, docs.rs, and making Cargo not add it by default, and it is
not generally up to date/useful information, we should remove it from
crates in this repo.
Remove unstable `--pretty` flag
It doesn't do anything `--unpretty` doesn't, and due to a bug, also
didn't show up in `--help`. I don't think there's any reason to keep it
around, I haven't seen anyone using it.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36473.
There are several cases where names of types and functions in the debug info are either ambiguous, or not helpful, such as including ambiguous placeholders (e.g., `{{impl}}`, `{{closure}}` or `dyn _'`) or dropping qualifications (e.g., for dynamic types).
Instead, each debug symbol name should be unique and useful:
* Include disambiguators for anonymous `DefPathDataName` (closures and generators), and unify their formatting when used as a path-qualifier vs item being qualified.
* Qualify the principal trait for dynamic types.
* If there is no principal trait for a dynamic type, emit all other traits instead.
* Respect the `qualified` argument when emitting ref and pointer types.
* For implementations, emit the disambiguator.
* Print const generics when emitting generic parameters or arguments.
Additionally, when targeting MSVC, its debugger treats many command arguments as C++ expressions, even when the argument is defined to be a symbol name. As such names in the debug info need to be more C++-like to be parsed correctly:
* Avoid characters with special meaning (`#`, `[`, `"`, `+`).
* Never start a name with `<` or `{` as this is treated as an operator.
* `>>` is always treated as a right-shift, even when parsing generic arguments (so add a space to avoid this).
* Emit function declarations using C/C++ style syntax (e.g., leading return type).
* Emit arrays as a synthetic `array$<type, size>` type.
* Include a `$` in all synthetic types as this is a legal character for C++, but not Rust (thus we avoid collisions with user types).
Otherwise something that ought to seemingly work like `//[x86]
needs-llvm-components: x86` or `//[nll_beyond]should-fail` do not get
evaluated properly.
MVP for using rust-lld as part of cc
Will fix#71519. I need to figure out how to write a test showing that lld is used instead of whatever linker cc normally uses. When I manually run rustc using `echo 'fn main() {}' | RUSTC_LOG=rustc_codegen_ssa::back::link=debug ./rustc -Clinker-flavor=gcc-lld --crate-type bin -Clink-arg=-Wl,-v` (thanks to bjorn3 on Zulip), I can see that lld is used, but I'm not sure how to inspect that output in a test.
Add the x86_64-gnu-stable builder
During the 1.52 release process we had to deal with some commits that passed the test suite on the nightly branch but failed on the beta or stable branch. In that case it was due to some UI tests including the channel name in the output, but other changes might also be dependent on the channel.
This commit adds a new CI job that runs the Linux x86_64 test suite with the stable branch, ensuring nightly changes also work as stable. To ensure the new job works the following other changes are present:
* The `ui-fulldeps/session-derive-errors.rs` test has been disabled on beta and stable, which required adding support for `// ignore-{channel}` and `// only-{channel}`.
* The `rustdoc/intra-doc/field.rs` has been fixed.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/release-team/issues/11
ignore test if rust-lld not found
create ld -> rust-lld symlink at build time instead of run time
for testing in ci
copy instead of symlinking
remove linux check
test for linker, suggestions from bjorn3
fix overly restrictive lld matcher
use -Zgcc-ld flag instead of -Clinker-flavor
refactor code adding lld to gcc path
revert ci changes
suggestions from petrochenkov
rename gcc_ld to gcc-ld in dirs
rustdoc: Print a warning if the diff when comparing to old nightlies is empty
This avoids confusing situations where it's unclear whether there's a
bug in the diff tool or not:
```
26: `@has` check failed
`XPATH PATTERN` did not match
// `@has` - '//code/a[`@href="{{channel}}/std/primitive.i32.html"]'` 'i32'
Encountered 6 errors
------------------------------------------
info: generating a diff against nightly rustdoc
failures:
[rustdoc] rustdoc/primitive-reexport.rs
```
The session-derive-errors test ensures the internal SessionDiagnostic
derive macro outputs the right error messages when misused.
The macro relies on the proc_macro2 crate though, which changes its span
behavior depending on whether the channel is nightly or not. This caused
test failures when bumping the channel from nightly to beta/stable.
Since SessionDiagnostic is internal-only we don't care about its
diagnostics quality outside of nightly, as the compiler itself is
developed on nightly. Thus the easiest solution is to ignore that test
on the beta and stable channels.
This also implements `// only-{channel}` and `// ignore-{channel}` in
compiletest to properly support the change.
bors