Simpler checked shifts in MIR building
Doing masking to check unsigned shift amounts is overcomplicated; just comparing the shift directly saves a statement and a temporary, as well as is much easier to read as a human. And shifting by unsigned is the canonical case -- notably, all the library shifting methods (that don't support every type) take shift RHSs as `u32` -- so we might as well make that simpler since it's easy to do so.
This PR also changes *signed* shift amounts to `IntToInt` casts and then uses the same check as for unsigned. The bit-masking is a nice trick, but for example LLVM actually canonicalizes it to an unsigned comparison anyway <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/8h59fMGT4> so I don't think it's worth the effort and the extra `Constant`. (If MIR's `assert` was `assert_nz` then the masking might make sense, but when the `!=` uses another statement I think the comparison is better.)
To review, I suggest looking at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109475/commits/2ee0468c49be9f8ea68b7b935ea1f4c2555849e9 first -- that's the interesting code change and has a MIR diff.
My favourite part of the diff:
```diff
- _20 = BitAnd(_19, const 340282366920938463463374607431768211448_u128); // scope 0 at $DIR/shifts.rs:+2:34: +2:44
- _21 = Ne(move _20, const 0_u128); // scope 0 at $DIR/shifts.rs:+2:34: +2:44
- assert(!move _21, "attempt to shift right by `{}`, which would overflow", _19) -> [success: bb3, unwind: bb7]; // scope 0 at $DIR/shifts.rs:+2:34: +2:44
+ _18 = Lt(_17, const 8_u128); // scope 0 at $DIR/shifts.rs:+2:34: +2:44
+ assert(move _18, "attempt to shift right by `{}`, which would overflow", _17) -> [success: bb3, unwind: bb7]; // scope 0 at $DIR/shifts.rs:+2:34: +2:44
```
Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate)
Emitting an "alias-eq" is too strict in some situations, since we don't always want strict equality between a projection and rigid ty. Adds a relation direction.
* I could probably just reuse this [`RelationDir`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/combine/enum.RelationDir.html) -- happy to uplift that struct into middle and use that instead, but I didn't feel compelled to... 🤷
* Some of the matching in `compute_alias_relate_goal` is a bit verbose -- I guess I could simplify it by using [`At::relate`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/at/struct.At.html#method.relate) and mapping the relation-dir to a variance.
* Alternatively, I coulld simplify things by making more helper functions on `EvalCtxt` (e.g. `EvalCtxt::relate_with_direction(T, T)` that also does the nested goal registration). No preference.
r? ```@lcnr``` cc ```@BoxyUwU``` though boxy can claim it if she wants
NOTE: first commit is all the changes, the second is just renaming stuff
Suppress `opaque_hidden_inferred_bound` for nested RPITs
They trigger too much, making repos like linkerd/linkerd2-proxy#2275 sad.
Ideally, at least for RPITs (and probably TAITs?), specifically when we have `impl Trait<Assoc = impl ..>`, that nested opaque should have the necessary `Assoc` item bounds elaborated into its own item bounds. But that's another story.
r? ```@oli-obk```
Do not feed param_env for RPITITs impl side
r? `@compiler-errors`
I don't think this needs more comments or things that we already have but please let me know if you want some comments or something else in this PR.
Custom MIR: Allow optional RET type annotation
This currently doesn't compile because the type of `RET` is inferred, which fails if RET is a composite type and fields are initialised separately.
```rust
#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics)]
extern crate core;
use core::intrinsics::mir::*;
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "optimized")]
fn fn0() -> (i32, bool) {
mir! ({
RET.0 = 0;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
})
}
```
```
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> src/lib.rs:8:9
|
8 | RET.0 = 0;
| ^^^ cannot infer type
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0282`.
```
This PR allows the user to manually specify the return type with `type RET = ...;` if required:
```rust
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "optimized")]
fn fn0() -> (i32, bool) {
mir! (
type RET = (i32, bool);
{
RET.0 = 0;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
}
)
}
```
The syntax is not optimal, I'm happy to see other suggestions. Ideally I wanted it to be a normal type annotation like `let RET: ...;`, but this runs into the multiple parsing options error during macro expansion, as it can be parsed as a normal `let` declaration as well.
r? ```@oli-obk``` or ```@tmiasko``` or ```@JakobDegen```
Detect uninhabited types early in const eval
r? `@RalfJung`
implements https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108442#discussion_r1143003840
this is a breaking change, as some UB during const eval is now detected instead of silently being ignored. Users can see this and other UB that may cause future breakage with `-Zextra-const-ub-checks` or just by running miri on their code, which sets that flag by default.
Do not consider synthesized RPITITs on missing items checks
Without this patch for `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs` we get ...
```
warning: the feature `return_position_impl_trait_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs:4:12
|
4 | #![feature(return_position_impl_trait_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error[E0046]: not all trait items implemented, missing: `foo`, ``
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs:12:1
|
8 | fn foo(&self) -> impl Sized;
| ----------------------------
| | |
| | `` from trait
| `foo` from trait
...
12 | impl MyTrait for i32 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `foo`, `` in implementation
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0046`.
```
instead of ...
```
warning: the feature `return_position_impl_trait_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs:4:12
|
LL | #![feature(return_position_impl_trait_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error[E0046]: not all trait items implemented, missing: `foo`
--> $DIR/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs:12:1
|
LL | fn foo(&self) -> impl Sized;
| ---------------------------- `foo` from trait
...
LL | impl MyTrait for i32 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `foo` in implementation
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0046`.
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
rustdoc: Cleanup parent module tracking for doc links
Keep ids of the documented items themselves, not their parent modules. Parent modules can be retreived from those ids when necessary.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108501.
That issue could be fixed in a more local way, but this refactoring is something that I wanted to do since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93805 anyway.
move Option::as_slice to intrinsic
````@scottmcm```` suggested on #109095 I use a direct approach of unpacking the operation in MIR lowering, so here's the implementation.
cc ````@nikic```` as this should hopefully unblock #107224 (though perhaps other changes to the prior implementation, which I left for bootstrapping, are needed).
a general type system cleanup
removes the helper functions `traits::fully_solve_X` as they add more complexity then they are worth. It's confusing which of these helpers should be used in which context.
changes the way we deal with overflow to always add depth in `evaluate_predicates_recursively`. It may make sense to actually fully transition to not have `recursion_depth` on obligations but that's probably a bit too much for this PR.
also removes some other small - and imo unnecessary - helpers.
r? types
Do not suggest bounds restrictions for synthesized RPITITs
Before this PR we were getting ...
```
warning: the feature `async_fn_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:5:12
|
5 | #![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: future cannot be sent between threads safely
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:17:20
|
17 | assert_is_send(test::<T>());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ future returned by `test` is not `Send`
|
= help: within `impl Future<Output = ()>`, the trait `Send` is not implemented for `impl Future<Output = ()>`
note: future is not `Send` as it awaits another future which is not `Send`
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:13:5
|
13 | T::bar().await;
| ^^^^^^^^ await occurs here on type `impl Future<Output = ()>`, which is not `Send`
note: required by a bound in `assert_is_send`
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:21:27
|
21 | fn assert_is_send(_: impl Send) {}
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `assert_is_send`
help: consider further restricting the associated type
|
16 | fn test2<T: Foo>() where impl Future<Output = ()>: Send {
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
and we want this output ...
```
warning: the feature `async_fn_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:5:12
|
LL | #![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: future cannot be sent between threads safely
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:17:20
|
LL | assert_is_send(test::<T>());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ future returned by `test` is not `Send`
|
= help: within `impl Future<Output = ()>`, the trait `Send` is not implemented for `impl Future<Output = ()>`
note: future is not `Send` as it awaits another future which is not `Send`
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:13:5
|
LL | T::bar().await;
| ^^^^^^^^ await occurs here on type `impl Future<Output = ()>`, which is not `Send`
note: required by a bound in `assert_is_send`
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:21:27
|
LL | fn assert_is_send(_: impl Send) {}
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `assert_is_send`
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
Only implement Fn* traits for extern "Rust" safe function pointers and items
Since calling the function via an `Fn` trait will assume `extern "Rust"` ABI and not do any safety checks, only safe `extern "Rust"` function can implement the `Fn` traits. This syncs the logic between the old solver and the new solver.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Constrain const vars to error if const types are mismatched
When equating two consts of different types, if either are const variables, constrain them to the correct const error kind.
This helps us avoid "successfully" matching a const against an impl signature but leaving unconstrained const vars, which will lead to incremental ICEs when we call const-eval queries during const projection.
Fixes#109296
The second commit in the stack fixes a regression in the first commit where we end up mentioning `[const error]` in an impl overlap error message. I think the error message changes for the better, but I could implement alternative strategies to avoid this without delaying the overlap error message...
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Custom MIR: Support aggregate expressions
Add support for tuple, array and ADT expressions in custom mir
r? `````@oli-obk````` or `````@tmiasko````` or `````@JakobDegen`````
Walk un-shifted nested `impl Trait` in trait when setting up default trait method assumptions
Fixes a double subtraction in some binder math in return-position `impl Trait` in trait handling code.
Fixes#109239
Remove the assume(!is_null) from Vec::as_ptr
At a guess, this code is leftover from LLVM was worse at keeping track of the niche information here. In any case, we don't need this anymore: Removing this `assume` doesn't get rid of the `nonnull` attribute on the return type.
Distribute libntdll.a with windows-gnu toolchains
This allows the OS loader to load essential functions (e.g. read/write file) at load time instead of lazily doing so at runtime.
r? libs
Only expect a GAT const param for `type_of` of GAT const arg
IDK why we were account for both `is_ty_or_const` instead of just for a const param, since we're computing the `type_of` a const param specifically.
Fixes#109300
Matthias Krüger