Implement the MCP 932: Promote riscv64a23-unknown-linux-gnu to Tier 2
Implement the [MCP 932](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/932): Promote riscv64a23-unknown-linux-gnu to Tier 2 without host tools.
Closesrust-lang/rust#148353.
Changes:
- Update target tier from 3 to 2 in target specification
- Update platform documentation
- Add CI/CD support for automatic building and distribution via rustup
r? jieyouxu
cc `@davidtwco` `@Noratrieb`
mgca: Finish implementation of `#[type_const]`
tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#132980fixesrust-lang/rust#140729fixesrust-lang/rust#140860
- **Fix `#[type_const]` attribute placement validation**
- **Perform WF-checking on type_const RHS's**
- **Check type_const type is ConstParamTy_ and that RHS matches it**
- **Check that impls of `#[type_const]` consts also have the attr**
r? ```@BoxyUwU```
Remove `#[const_trait]`
Remove `#[const_trait]` since we now have `const trait`. Update all structured diagnostics that still suggested the attribute.
r? ```@rust-lang/project-const-traits```
Encode cfg trace, not its early counterpart to fix cross-crate `doc(auto_cfg)`
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141301.
<details><summary>Rambling about <code>target_feature</code> which I didn't touch here</summary>
Regarding https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141301#issuecomment-3390100259 (`#[target_feature(enable = …)]` on inlined cross-crate re-exports), it has the same underlying cause (namely, we neither encode `target_feature` nor `AttributeKind::TargetFeature` in the crate metadata). However, I didn't make that change because I first want to experiment with querying `TyCtxt::codegen_fn_attrs` in rustdoc instead which already works cross-crate (and also use to it for reconstructing `no_mangle`, `export_name`, `link_section` to avoid encoding these attributes unnecessarily (basically reverting rust-lang/rust#144050) as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144004#issuecomment-3077725837).
</details>
r? GuillaumeGomez
Recover `[T: N]` as `[T; N]`
`;` is similar and (keyboard-wise) next to `:`, so a verbose suggestion may help to see the difference.
Parent PR: rust-lang/rust#143905
---
`@rustbot` label +A-parser +A-array +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics +D-papercut
Remove a remnant of `dyn*` from the parser
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146664 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143036.
`is_explicit_dyn_type` still checked for `TokenKind::Star` which made no sense now that `dyn*` is no more.
Removing it doesn't represent a functional change and merely affects diagnostics. That's because the check only dictated whether to interpret `dyn` as the start of a trait object type in Rust 2015 (where this identifier is only a *contextual* keyword). However, we would still fail at the `*` later on as it doesn't start a bound.
While at it, I also took the time to clean up in the vicinity.
don't completely reset `HeadUsages`
This is really subtle ☠️ I've actually went and added testing for `search_graph.ignore_candidate_head_usages` to https://github.com/lcnr/search_graph_fuzz now. I should have done that when I originally implemented but didn't quite know how to do so back then.
The search graph is far too subtle to think through it manually. I've added the affected proof tree to https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/blob/main/notes/next-solver/search-graph/general.md#keeping-provisional-cache-entries-on-rerun. It's
- A
- B
- C (depends on B and gets dropped when rerunning)
- D (does not depend on B so we keep it around when rerunning)
- C (irrevant candidate)
- A
- B
- D
- C (irrevant candidate)
- D
- A
- rerun
- C (use provisional cache entry which doesn't depend on B)
- D (use provisional cache entry which doesn't depend on B)
Fixes the ICE in https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/246#issuecomment-3497832902. I think this issue is brittle enough that adding that as a test isn't really useful. Any small change to the search graph will prevent it from testing this. We do test this fix via the fuzzer.
r? `````@BoxyUwU`````
Add note for identifier with attempted hygiene violation
Fixesrust-lang/rust#148580
I changed the original test to make sure we are pointing to the right scope.
rustc_builtin_macros: rename bench parameter to avoid collisions with user-defined function names
Resolvesrust-lang/rust#148275 by preventing name collisions in the `#[bench]` macro.
Previously, a user-defined function named "b" could not be benchmarked because
the macro-generated lambda identity collided with the same name. We now generate
the lambda ident as `__bench_<function_name>`, ensuring it is always distinct
from the user’s function.
Because the prefix is applied recursively (e.g. benchmarking `__bench_b`
produces a lambda ident `__bench___bench_b`), there is no possible function
name that can equal its corresponding lambda ident. This guarantees that
the user can safely bench a function of any valid name without risk of
identifier collision.
Show packed field alignment in mir_transform_unaligned_packed_ref
Fixesrust-lang/rust#147528
I left the expected padding for the field out of the error message so the message would be the same on all platforms. It also isn't always possible to know the expected alignment, so this makes the message simpler.
Add correct suggestion for multi-references for self type in method
Currently the suggestion for this code
```rust
fn main() {}
struct A {
field: i32,
}
impl A {
fn f(&&self) {}
}
```
looks like this, which is incorrect and missleading
```rust
Compiling playground v0.0.1 (/playground)
error: expected one of `!`, `(`, `...`, `..=`, `..`, `::`, `:`, `{`, or `|`, found `)`
--> src/main.rs:8:16
|
8 | fn f(&&self) {}
| ^ expected one of 9 possible tokens
|
= note: anonymous parameters are removed in the 2018 edition (see RFC 1685)
help: explicitly ignore the parameter name
|
8 | fn f(_: &&self) {}
| ++
```
So this fixes it and make more correct suggestions
```rust
error: expected one of `!`, `(`, `...`, `..=`, `..`, `::`, `:`, `{`, or `|`, found `)`
--> /home/gh-Kivooeo/test_/src/main.rs:8:16
|
8 | fn f(&&self) {}
| ^ expected one of 9 possible tokens
|
help: `self` should be `self`, `&self` or `&mut self`, please remove extra references
|
8 - fn f(&&self) {}
8 + fn f(&self) {}
```
Implementation is pretty self-documenting, but if you have suggestions on how to improve this (according to current test, which may be not fully covering all cases, this is works very well) or have some funny edge cases to show, I would appreciate it
r? compiler
Add `overflow_checks` intrinsic
This adds an intrinsic which allows code in a pre-built library to inherit the overflow checks option from a crate depending on it. This enables code in the standard library to explicitly change behavior based on whether `overflow_checks` are enabled, regardless of the setting used when standard library was compiled.
This is very similar to the `ub_checks` intrinsic, and refactors the two to use a common mechanism.
The primary use case for this is to allow the new `RangeFrom` iterator to yield the maximum element before overflowing, as requested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125687#issuecomment-2151118208). This PR includes a working `IterRangeFrom` implementation based on this new intrinsic that exhibits the desired behavior.
[Prior discussion on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Ability.20to.20select.20code.20based.20on.20.60overflow_checks.60.3F)
mgca: Add ConstArg representation for const items
tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#132980fixesrust-lang/rust#131046fixesrust-lang/rust#134641
As part of implementing `min_generic_const_args`, we need to distinguish const items that can be used in the type system, such as in associated const equality projections, from const items containing arbitrary const code, which must be kept out of the type system. Specifically, all "type consts" must be either concrete (no generics) or generic with a trivial expression like `N` or a path to another type const item.
To syntactically distinguish these cases, we require, for now at least, that users annotate all type consts with the `#[type_const]` attribute. Then, we validate that the const's right-hand side is indeed eligible to be a type const and represent it differently in the HIR.
We accomplish this representation using a new `ConstItemRhs` enum in the HIR, and a similar but simpler enum in the AST. When `#[type_const]` is **not** applied to a const (e.g. on stable), we represent const item right-hand sides (rhs's) as HIR bodies, like before. However, when the attribute is applied, we instead lower to a `hir::ConstArg`. This syntactically distinguishes between trivial const args (paths) and arbitrary expressions, which are represented using `AnonConst`s. Then in `generics_of`, we can take advantage of the existing machinery to bar the `AnonConst` rhs's from using parent generics.
re-use `self.get_all_attrs` result for pass indirectly attribute
Could be a fix for a potential performance regression reported here https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144529#issuecomment-3491236458. Apparently the regression later disappeared. Nevertheless, this seems like a decent refactor.
r? ````@JonathanBrouwer```` (vaguely attribute-related, maybe there are other optimizations to that PR that we're missing)
Add LLVM realtime sanitizer
This is a new attempt at adding the [LLVM real-time sanitizer](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/RealtimeSanitizer.html) to rust.
Previously this was attempted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3766.
Since then the `sanitize` attribute was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142681 and it is a lot more flexible than the old `no_santize` attribute. This allows adding real-time sanitizer without the need for a new attribute, like it was proposed in the RFC. Because i only add a new value to a existing command line flag and to a attribute i don't think an MCP is necessary.
Currently real-time santizer is usable in rust code with the [rtsan-standalone](https://crates.io/crates/rtsan-standalone) crate. This downloads or builds the sanitizer runtime and then links it into the rust binary.
The first commit adds support for more detailed sanitizer information.
The second commit then actually adds real-time sanitizer.
The third adds a warning against using real-time sanitizer with async functions, cloures and blocks because it doesn't behave as expected when used with async functions. I am not sure if this is actually wanted, so i kept it in a seperate commit.
The fourth commit adds the documentation for real-time sanitizer.
Add -Zannotate-moves for profiler visibility of move/copy operations (codegen)
**Note:** this is an alternative implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/147206; rather than being a MIR transform, it adds the annotations closer to codegen. It's functionally the same but the implementation is lower impact and it could be more correct.
---
This implements a new unstable compiler flag `-Zannotate-moves` that makes move and copy operations visible in profilers by creating synthetic debug information. This is achieved with zero runtime cost by manipulating debug info scopes to make moves/copies appear as calls to `compiler_move<T, SIZE>` and `compiler_copy<T, SIZE>` marker functions in profiling tools.
This allows developers to identify expensive move/copy operations in their code using standard profiling tools, without requiring specialized tooling or runtime instrumentation.
The implementation works at codegen time. When processing MIR operands (`Operand::Move` and `Operand::Copy`), the codegen creates an `OperandRef` with an optional `move_annotation` field containing an `Instance` of the appropriate profiling marker function. When storing the operand, `store_with_annotation()` wraps the store operation in a synthetic debug scope that makes it appear inlined from the marker.
Two marker functions (`compiler_move` and `compiler_copy`) are defined in `library/core/src/profiling.rs`. These are never actually called - they exist solely as debug info anchors.
Operations are only annotated if:
- We're generating debug info and the feature is enabled.
- Meets the size threshold (default: 65 bytes, configurable via `-Zannotate-moves=SIZE`), and is non-zero
- Has a memory representation
This has a very small size impact on object file size. With the default limit it's well under 0.1%, and even with a very small limit of 8 bytes it's still ~1.5%. This could be enabled by default.
Update memchr to 2.7.6
memchr 2.7.6 contains a bugfix for aarch64_be.
Note: I'm not sure about how dependency updates are managed in rust.git. If something should go through another branch or will happen automatically, please let me know.
bors