Spelling compiler
This is per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110392#issuecomment-1510193656
I'm going to delay performing a squash because I really don't expect people to be perfectly happy w/ my changes, I really am a human and I really do make mistakes.
r? Nilstrieb
I'm going to be flying this evening, but I should be able to squash / respond to reviews w/in a day or two.
I tried to be careful about dropping changes to `tests`, afaict only two files had changes that were likely related to the changes for a given commit (this is where not having eagerly squashed should have given me an advantage), but, that said, picking things apart can be error prone.
Convert all the crates that have had their diagnostic migration
completed (except save_analysis because that will be deleted soon and
apfloat because of the licensing problem).
`print_time_passes_entry` unconditionally prints data about a pass. The
most commonly used call site, in `VerboseTimingGuard::drop`, guards it
with a `should_print_passes` test. But there are a couple of other call
sites that don't do that test.
This commit moves the `should_print_passes` test within
`print_time_passes_entry` so that all passes are treated equally.
The compiler currently has `-Ztime` and `-Ztime-passes`. I've used
`-Ztime-passes` for years but only recently learned about `-Ztime`.
What's the difference? Let's look at the `-Zhelp` output:
```
-Z time=val -- measure time of rustc processes (default: no)
-Z time-passes=val -- measure time of each rustc pass (default: no)
```
The `-Ztime-passes` description is clear, but the `-Ztime` one is less so.
Sounds like it measures the time for the entire process?
No. The real difference is that `-Ztime-passes` prints out info about passes,
and `-Ztime` does the same, but only for a subset of those passes. More
specifically, there is a distinction in the profiling code between a "verbose
generic activity" and an "extra verbose generic activity". `-Ztime-passes`
prints both kinds, while `-Ztime` only prints the first one. (It took me
a close reading of the source code to determine this difference.)
In practice this distinction has low value. Perhaps in the past the "extra
verbose" output was more voluminous, but now that we only print stats for a
pass if it exceeds 5ms or alters the RSS, `-Ztime-passes` is less spammy. Also,
a lot of the "extra verbose" cases are for individual lint passes, and you need
to also use `-Zno-interleave-lints` to see those anyway.
Therefore, this commit removes `-Ztime` and the associated machinery. One thing
to note is that the existing "extra verbose" activities all have an extra
string argument, so the commit adds the ability to accept an extra argument to
the "verbose" activities.
Fixing #95444 by only displaying passes that take more than 5 millise…
As discussed in #95444, I have added the code to test and only display prints that are greater than 5 milliseconds.
r? `@jyn514`
95444: Adding passes that include memory increase
Fix95444: Change the substraction with the abs_diff() method
Fix95444: Change the substraction with abs_diff() method
This allows profiling costly arguments to be recorded only when `-Zself-profile-events=args` is on: using a closure that takes an `EventArgRecorder` and call its `record_arg` or `record_args` methods.
Previously, only the end of pass RSS was indicated. This could easily
lead one to believe that the change in RSS from one pass to the next was
attributable to the second pass, when in fact it occurred between the
end of the first pass and the start of the second.
Also, improve alignment of columns.
This is helpful when looking for CGUs where the size estimate isn't a
good indicator of compilation time.
I verified that moving the profiling timer call doesn't affect the
results.
Caio