resolve: Support custom attributes when macro modularization is enabled
Basically, if resolution of a single-segment attribute is a determined error, then we interpret it as a custom attribute.
Since custom attributes are integrated into general macro resolution, `feature(custom_attribute)` now requires and implicitly enables macro modularization (`feature(use_extern_macros)`).
Actually, a few other "advanced" macro features now implicitly enable macro modularization too (and one bug was found and fixed in process of enabling it).
The first two commits are preliminary cleanups/refactorings.
Add errors for unknown, stable and duplicate feature attributes
- Adds an error for unknown (lang and lib) features.
- Extends the lint for unnecessary feature attributes for stable features to libs features (this already exists for lang features).
- Adds an error for duplicate (lang and lib) features.
```rust
#![feature(fake_feature)] //~ ERROR unknown feature `fake_feature`
#![feature(i128_type)] //~ WARNING the feature `i128_type` has been stable since 1.26.0
#![feature(non_exhaustive)]
#![feature(non_exhaustive)] //~ ERROR duplicate `non_exhaustive` feature attribute
```
Fixes#52053, fixes#53032 and address some of the problems noted in #44232 (though not unused features).
There are a few outstanding problems, that I haven't narrowed down yet:
- [x] Stability attributes on macros do not seem to be taken into account.
- [x] Stability attributes behind `cfg` attributes are not taken into account.
- [x] There are failing incremental tests.
dead-code lint: say "constructed" for structs
Respectively.
This is a sequel to November 2017's #46103 / 1a9dc2e9. It had been
reported (more than once—at least #19140, #44083, and #44565) that the
"never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used"
as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never "constructed"
specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same issue was raised
for structs (#52325). It seems consistent to say "constructed" here,
too, for the same reasons.
~~While we're here, we can also use more specific word "called" for unused
functions and methods. (We declined to do this in #46103, but the
rationale given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense.)~~
This resolves#52325.
Reintroduce `Undef` and properly check constant value sizes
r? @RalfJung
cc @eddyb
basically all kinds of silent failures that never occurred are assertions now
resolve: Implement prelude search for macro paths, implement tool attributes
When identifier is macro path is resolved in scopes (i.e. the first path segment - `foo` in `foo::mac!()` or `foo!()`), scopes are searched in the same order as for non-macro paths - items in modules, extern prelude, tool prelude (see later), standard library prelude, language prelude, but with some extra shadowing restrictions (names from globs and macro expansions cannot shadow names from outer scopes). See the comment in `fn resolve_lexical_macro_path_segment` for more details.
"Tool prelude" currently contains two "tool modules" `rustfmt` and `clippy`, and is searched immediately after extern prelude.
This makes the [possible long-term solution](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2103-tool-attributes.md#long-term-solution) for tool attributes exactly equivalent to the existing extern prelude scheme, except that `--extern=my_crate` making crate names available in scope is replaced with something like `--tool=my_tool` making tool names available in scope.
The `tool_attributes` feature is still unstable and `#![feature(tool_attributes)]` now implicitly enables `#![feature(use_extern_macros)]`. `use_extern_macros` is a prerequisite for `tool_attributes`, so their stabilization will happen in the same order.
If `use_extern_macros` is not enabled, then tool attributes are treated as custom attributes (this is temporary, anyway).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52576
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52512
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51277
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52269
rustc_resolve: record single-segment extern crate import resolutions.
Fixes#52489 by recording special-cased single-segment imports for later (e.g. stability) checks.
cc @alexcrichton @Mark-Simulacrum @petrochenkov
Does this need to be backported?
Previously linker diagnostic were being hidden when two modules were linked
together but failed to link. This commit fixes the situation by ensuring that we
have a diagnostic handler installed and also adds support for handling linker
diagnostics.
do not overwrite child def-id in place but rather remove/insert
When inserting a node N into the tree of impls, we sometimes find than an existing node C should be replaced with N. We used to overwrite C in place with the new def-id N -- but since the lists of def-ids are separated by simplified type, that could lead to N being inserted in the wrong place. This meant we might miss conflicts. We are now not trying to be so smart -- we remove C and then add N later.
Fixes#52050
r? @aturon -- do you still remember this code at all? :)
Rollup of 16 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #52558 (Add tests for ICEs which no longer repro)
- #52610 (Clarify what a task is)
- #52617 (Don't match on region kinds when reporting NLL errors)
- #52635 (Fix #[linkage] propagation though generic functions)
- #52647 (Suggest to take and ignore args while closure args count mismatching)
- #52649 (Point spans to inner elements of format strings)
- #52654 (Format linker args in a way that works for gcc and ld)
- #52667 (update the stdsimd submodule)
- #52674 (Impl Executor for Box<E: Executor>)
- #52690 (ARM: expose `rclass` and `dsp` target features)
- #52692 (Improve readability in a few sorts)
- #52695 (Hide some lints which are not quite right the way they are reported to the user)
- #52718 (State default capacity for BufReader/BufWriter)
- #52721 (std::ops::Try impl for std::task::Poll)
- #52723 (rustc: Register crates under their real names)
- #52734 (sparc ABI issue - structure returning from function is returned in 64bit registers (with tests))
Failed merges:
- #52678 ([NLL] Use better spans in some errors)
r? @ghost
This is a sequel to November 2017's #46103 / 1a9dc2e9. It had been
reported (more than once—at least #19140, #44083, and #44565) that the
"never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used"
as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never
"constructed" specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same
issue was raised for structs (#52325). It seems consistent to say
"constructed" here, too, for the same reasons.
We considered using more specific word "called" for unused functions
and methods (while we declined to do this in #46103, the rationale
given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense), but it turns
out that Cargo's test suite expects the "never used" message, and
maybe we don't care enough even to make a Cargo PR over such a petty
and subjective wording change.
This resolves#52325.
When inserting a node N into the tree of impls, we sometimes find than
an existing node C should be replaced with N. We used to overwrite C
in place with the new def-id N -- but since the lists of def-ids are
separated by simplified type, that could lead to N being inserted in
the wrong place. This meant we might miss conflicts. We are now not
trying to be so smart -- we remove C and then add N later.
Jorge Aparicio