Commit Graph

1751 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonathan Brouwer aa9d13374b Rollup merge of #156814 - cezarbbb:fix-issue-156714, r=jieyouxu
Extend macOS deployment target mismatch filter to cover dylib and new ld formats

The `deployment_mismatch` filter in `report_linker_output` only matched the old ld64 format for object files. With linker-messages promoted to warn-by-default in rust-lang/rust#153968, unfiltered deployment target warnings from dylibs and the new Apple linker (ld_prime) now surface as noise for users who never set `MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`.

Fixes rust-lang/rust#156714.

At present, the filter works only covered the specific format:

`ld: warning: object file (...) was built for newer 'macOS' version (...) than being linked (...)`

This was fine because linker-messages was `Allow-by-default` — nobody saw the other formats anyway. Then rust-lang/rust#153968 promoted it to Warn, and the gaps became visible.

Broadens the filter to cover all known ld deployment target version mismatch formats:

`ld: warning: object file (...)` — old ld64, already handled
`ld: warning: dylib (...)` — old ld64, was missing
All Apple platforms (`iOS`, `tvOS`, `watchOS`, `xrOS`, etc.), not just `macOS`
`ld: building for <platform>-A.B, but linking with dylib '...' which was built for newer version C.D` — new linker (ld_prime, Xcode 15+), the exact format from rust-lang/rust#156714

All matched messages are downgraded to `linker_info` (Allow-by-default), consistent with the existing behavior for the object file case.
2026-05-27 08:14:26 +02:00
cezarbbb 52bedb4c05 Suppress macOS deployment target linker warnings from ld_prime 2026-05-27 11:32:09 +08:00
Zalathar 028b8b6c54 Simplify //@ needs-asm-mnemonic: ret to just //@ needs-asm-ret
The `needs-asm-mnemonic` directive was very general, but in practice was only
being used for `ret`. There are very few other mnemonics that it could
plausibly be useful for (e.g. `nop`), because any instruction that requires
arguments is probably going to be non-portable.

This PR replaces `needs-asm-mnemonic` with a simpler `needs-asm-ret` directive
that uses the same machinery as other simple needs directives.

If we happend to need more mnemonics in the future, we can just add more simple
directives as appropriate (e.g. `needs-asm-nop`).
2026-05-25 17:15:32 +10:00
bors 4d276d7fdb Auto merge of #155307 - Urgau:rustdoc-stabilize-remap-path-prefix, r=GuillaumeGomez
Stabilize `--remap-path-prefix` in rustdoc



# Stabilization report of  `--remap-path-prefix` in rustdoc

## Summary

`rustc` supports remapping source paths prefixes as a best effort in all compiler generated output, including compiler diagnostics, debugging information, macro expansions, documentation, doctests, etc.

This is useful for normalizing build products, for example, by removing the current directory out of the paths emitted into object files.

This stabilization stabilize the same flag used by `rustc` in `rustdoc`.

There are no tracking issue.

Stabilization was discussed at the last meeting, [#t-rustdoc/meetings > 2026-04-13 @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/393423-t-rustdoc.2Fmeetings/topic/2026-04-13/near/585264347).

### What is stabilized

The rustdoc `--remap-path-prefix` flag is being stabilized by this PR. (It's equivalent to rustc flag)

It permits remapping (as a best effort) source path prefixes in all output, including diagnostics, debug information, macro expansions, generated documentation, etc.

It takes a value of the form `FROM=TO` where a path prefix equal to `FROM` is rewritten to the value `TO`.

#### Example

```sh
rustdoc src/lib.rs --remap-path-prefix="$PWD=/foo"
```

### What isn't stabilized

Neither `--remap-path-scope` (~~soon to be added as unstable in `rustdoc`~~ https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/155451) or the already unstable in `rustc` `documentation` scope are being stabilized or added here.

## Design

### Implementation history

- rust-lang/rust#107099

### Unresolved questions

There are no unresolved questions.

### Post-implementation changes

The implementation has evolved with `rustc`, but no changes to the flag it-self have been made.

### Nightly extensions

The `documentation` scope, which currently can only be set from `rustc`, as we need to add an equivalent to the `--remap-path-scope` flag, ~~which is planned~~ (EDIT: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/155451), but not required, the current `--remap-path-prefix` defaults to the `all` scope, like `rustc`.

### Doors closed

We are committing to having to having a flag that permits remapping paths. The compiler team already made the same commitment.

## Feedback

### Call for testing

No call for testing has been done.

### Nightly use

Unable to determine. A [GitHub search](https://github.com/search?q=%20%2F--remap-path-prefix%2F&type=code) only seems to only reveals the `rustc` usage (over 6k though).

Rust-for-Linux is using the [flag](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/e80d033851b3bc94c3d254ac66660ddd0a49d72c/Makefile#L1151-L1153).

## Implementation

### Major parts

- rust-lang/rust#107099
- rust-lang/rust#149709
- rust-lang/rust#150172
- rust-lang/rust#151589

### Coverage

- [`tests/rustdoc-ui/remap-path-prefix-failed-doctest-output.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/12f35ad39ed3e39df4d953c46d4f6cc6c82adc96/tests/rustdoc-ui/remap-path-prefix-failed-doctest-output.rs)
- [`tests/rustdoc-ui/remap-path-prefix-invalid-doctest.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/12f35ad39ed3e39df4d953c46d4f6cc6c82adc96/tests/rustdoc-ui/remap-path-prefix-invalid-doctest.rs)
- [`tests/rustdoc-ui/remap-path-prefix-macro.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/12f35ad39ed3e39df4d953c46d4f6cc6c82adc96/tests/rustdoc-ui/remap-path-prefix-macro.rs)
- [`tests/rustdoc-ui/remap-path-prefix-passed-doctest-output.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/12f35ad39ed3e39df4d953c46d4f6cc6c82adc96/tests/rustdoc-ui/remap-path-prefix-passed-doctest-output.rs)
- [`tests/rustdoc-ui/lints/remap-path-prefix-lint.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/12f35ad39ed3e39df4d953c46d4f6cc6c82adc96/tests/rustdoc-ui/lints/remap-path-prefix-lint.rs)
- [`tests/rustdoc-html/import-remapped-paths.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/12f35ad39ed3e39df4d953c46d4f6cc6c82adc96/tests/rustdoc-html/import-remapped-paths.rs)
- [`tests/rustdoc-html/macro/external-macro-src.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/12f35ad39ed3e39df4d953c46d4f6cc6c82adc96/tests/rustdoc-html/macro/external-macro-src.rs)

### Outstanding bugs

There are no outstanding bugs regarding `--remap-path-prefix` in `rustdoc`.

There are [caveats and limitation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/remap-source-paths.html#caveats-and-limitations) in `rustc`, but they mostly concern generated object files, which we don't really have. 

### Outstanding FIXMEs

There are no FIXME regarding `--remap-path-prefix`.

## Acknowledgments

- @edward-shen
- @Urgau
2026-05-21 22:46:41 +00:00
cyrgani 7450bf099e reduce usage of box_patterns in tests 2026-05-18 10:14:41 +00:00
Jonathan Brouwer 1f9aa27a9e Rollup merge of #155870 - madsmtm:fix-test-arm64e, r=chenyukang
Fix cross-compiling `macos-deployment-target-warning` test

`cc()` gets target flags, which won't match with the host triple used by `bare_rustc()`.

Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155716, with both of these, `./x test --target arm64e-apple-darwin tests` now succeeds.

r? compiler
2026-05-18 03:19:43 +02:00
Alyssa Haroldsen 39c766e310 Treat MSVC "performing full link" message as informational
When the MSVC incremental linker finds a .ilk file for incremental
linking but its associated .exe file is missing, this message is
printed to stdout in 1 line:

LINK : ...\foo.exe not found or not build by the last incremental link;
performing full link

However, if both the .ilk and .exe files are missing (for a clean
build), the message isn't printed and it still does a full link. So, the
presence of the message doesn't affect the result of the build.
2026-05-07 13:59:23 -07:00
Waffle Lapkin 810eae99af rename drop_in_place lang item to drop_glue 2026-05-05 12:36:39 +02:00
bors 67bcaa9c4b Auto merge of #153968 - jyn514:jyn/linker-warn-by-default, r=mati865
linker-messages is warn-by-default again

cc rust-lang/rust#136096 

I ended up keeping it a lint and adding an option for lints to ignore `-Dwarnings` (there was already a lint that did that actually, it was just hard-coded in rustc_middle instead of in rustc_lint_defs like I'd expect). This allows people to actually see the warnings without them failing the build in CI.
2026-05-01 17:15:17 +00:00
Vastargazing ef93fbbc9d tests/run-make/print-cfg: add Android target_env case
Android targets must not inherit `target_env="gnu"` from the Linux GNU
base. Cover this in the existing print-cfg run-make test so a future
target-spec refactor cannot silently re-introduce it.
2026-04-30 10:24:54 +03:00
Jonathan Brouwer 91783dd17f Rollup merge of #155899 - ChrisDenton:dlltool, r=mati865
`dlltool`: Set the working directory to workaround `--temp-prefix` bug

dlltool's `--temp-prefix` argument incorrectly splits paths that contain spaces. To workaround this, we pass a relative path to `--temp-prefix` and set the working directory.

fixes rust-lang/rust#155591
2026-04-29 23:51:35 +02:00
Jonathan Brouwer d936713d27 Rollup merge of #155721 - cezarbbb:fix-archive-ice-148217, r=bjorn3
When archive format is wrong produce an error instead of ICE

Fix rust-lang/rust#145624. Fix rust-lang/rust#147094. Fix rust-lang/rust#148217.
There are now two-step solutions to replace the original ICE:
Step 1: BSD format archive on a GNU/Linux target should emit a format mismatch warning.
Step 2: Corrupt archive with member offset exceeding file boundary should produce an error, not an ICE.

r? @bjorn3
2026-04-29 23:51:32 +02:00
cezarbbb b784a1ca79 When archive format is wrong produce an error instead of ICE 2026-04-29 20:21:02 +08:00
Chris Denton 6d20c98b81 Test that raw-dylib works with whitespace paths 2026-04-29 00:16:56 +00:00
Chris Denton 23c7bf054b Fix passing paths with space into dlltool 2026-04-29 00:16:36 +00:00
Jonathan Brouwer c6912bf401 Rollup merge of #155692 - fneddy:fix_naked-dead-code-elimination, r=folkertdev
disable naked-dead-code-elimination test if no RET mnemonic is available

this test emit x86_64 specific ret asm instruction and should not be compiled on any other arch.
2026-04-28 20:24:33 +02:00
Eddy (Eduard) Stefes 2a8e588c90 Add --print=backend-has-mnemonic and needs-asm-mnemonic directive
Add infrastructure to query LLVM backend for specific assembly mnemonics
and use it in compiletest to conditionally run tests based on instruction
availability.

This fixes test failures with naked-dead-code-elimination which requires
the `RET` mnemonic.

Co-authored-by: Folkert de Vries <flokkievids@gmail.com>
2026-04-28 10:21:15 +02:00
Mads Marquart 3be45b3bf0 Fix cross-compiling macos-deployment-target-warning test
`cc()` gets target flags, which won't match with the host triple used
by `bare_rustc()`.
2026-04-27 12:19:41 +02:00
jyn e09d7c19f4 Explain why -D warnings doesn't affect linker-warnings 2026-04-26 16:07:28 +00:00
jyn ffb01755cd Promote linker-messages to warn-by-default, but ignore -Dwarnings
and add a test
2026-04-26 16:07:28 +00:00
Jonathan Brouwer 7050d618af Rollup merge of #155485 - Urgau:remap-edge-case-test, r=GuillaumeGomez
Add an edge-case test for `--remap-path-prefix` for `rustc` & `rustdoc`

Intended to resolve @lolbinarycat concern https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155307#issuecomment-4270904667
2026-04-25 23:07:50 +02:00
Jonathan Brouwer d289cc7f53 Rollup merge of #155614 - folkertdev:rename-next-arg, r=tgross35
c-variadic: rename `VaList::arg` to `VaList::next_arg`

tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44930

per [the T-libs-api meeting](https://hackmd.io/d9D6vUnuTnCWygkc3hffEw#nominated-rusttf44930-Tracking-issue-for-RFC-2137-Support-defining-C-compatible-variadic-functions-in-Rust-c_variadic), rename `VaList::arg` to `VaList::next_arg`.
2026-04-23 09:38:23 +02:00
Jonathan Brouwer dcde112616 Rollup merge of #155374 - notriddle:non-static-dep-info, r=fmease
rustdoc: fix a few spots where emit isn't respected

Addresses the third list item of rust-lang/rust#155298
2026-04-22 19:18:29 +02:00
Folkert de Vries 84cd23b3c8 c-variadic: rename VaList::arg to VaList::next_arg 2026-04-22 16:02:11 +02:00
Jonathan Brouwer 356fdf02ca Rollup merge of #155517 - madsmtm:test-macho-link-section-attrs, r=bjorn3
Add a test for Mach-O `#[link_section]` API inherited from LLVM

The format of the `#[link_section]` attribute is under-documented, but on Mach-O, I think it's roughly the following BNF:
```
LinkSection -> Segment `,` Section (`,` (SectionType (`,` (SectionAttributes)?)?)?)?
Segment -> <0 to 16 bytes>
Section -> <0 to 16 bytes>
SectionType -> `regular` | `zerofill` | `cstring_literals` | `4byte_literals` | `8byte_literals` | `literal_pointers` | `non_lazy_symbol_pointers` | `lazy_symbol_pointers` | `symbol_stubs` | `mod_init_funcs` | `mod_term_funcs` | `coalesced` | `interposing` | `16byte_literals` | `thread_local_regular` | `thread_local_zerofill` | `thread_local_variables` | `thread_local_variable_pointers` | `thread_local_init_function_pointers`
SectionAttributes -> SectionAttribute (`+` SectionAttribute)*
SectionAttribute -> `pure_instructions` | `no_toc` | `strip_static_syms` | `no_dead_strip` | `live_support`, `self_modifying_code` | `debug`
```

This PR adds a small test for a little part of this.

Once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/154429 is resolved, this should make it possible to test https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift/pull/1648 end-to-end.

r? bjorn3
2026-04-20 13:52:06 +02:00
Mads Marquart 3695fefd93 Add a test for Mach-O link_section API inherited from LLVM 2026-04-19 23:49:02 +02:00
Michael Howell de48fc6a56 rustdoc: fix a few spots where emit isn't respected 2026-04-18 08:46:33 -07:00
Urgau a755d0f4cb Add an edge-case test for --remap-path-prefix for rustc & rustdoc 2026-04-18 15:54:12 +02:00
Jacob Pratt baf4388b8f Rollup merge of #147811 - folkertdev:naked-function-sections, r=Amanieu
naked functions: respect `function-sections`

fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147789

r? @Amanieu
2026-04-18 00:05:15 -04:00
Urgau d3bdea115d Stabilize --remap-path-prefix in rustdoc 2026-04-17 18:52:21 +02:00
Folkert de Vries 2db9de3782 add ignore-cross-compile to run-make test 2026-04-17 11:25:58 +02:00
Stuart Cook 91a7d1b498 Rollup merge of #152980 - folkertdev:c-variadic-avr, r=tgross35
c-variadic: fix implementation on `avr`

tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44930
cc target maintainer @Patryk27

I ran into multiple issues, and although with this PR and a little harness I can run the test with qemu on avr, the implementation is perhaps not ideal.

The problem we found is that on `avr` the `c_int/c_uint` types are `i16/u16`, and this was not handled in the c-variadic checks. Luckily there is a field in the target configuration that contains the targets `c_int_width`. However, this field is not actually used in `core` at all, there the 16-bit targets are just hardcoded.

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1500f0f47f5fe8ddcd6528f6c6c031b210b4eac5/library/core/src/ffi/primitives.rs#L174-L185

Perhaps we should expose this like endianness and pointer width?

---

Finally there are some changes to the test to make it compile with `no_std`.
2026-04-17 16:17:50 +10:00
Folkert de Vries b8ba4002f5 c-variadic: handle c_int being i16 and c_double being f32 on avr 2026-04-16 11:48:02 +02:00
Folkert de Vries 7787bd915b fix macho section specifier & windows test 2026-04-16 11:37:46 +02:00
Folkert de Vries 25e1647869 naked functions: add run-make test for DCE 2026-04-16 11:37:45 +02:00
Jacob Pratt a25356babb Rollup merge of #155357 - Urgau:rustdoc-remap-path-scope, r=GuillaumeGomez
Add `--remap-path-scope` as unstable in rustdoc

This PR adds support for `rustc` `--remap-path-scope` flag in rustdoc as unstable.

`rustc` documentation for the flag is [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/remap-source-paths.html#--remap-path-scope).

I added some complementary tests for `rustdoc`, no need I think to duplicate `rustc` UI tests.
2026-04-16 01:54:07 -04:00
Urgau ae6dbdd9f0 Add --remap-path-scope as unstable in rustdoc 2026-04-15 21:26:48 +02:00
Tshepang Mbambo 8619841f05 limit duplicate-profiler-builtins test to targets that can do dynamic linking 2026-04-14 10:57:46 +02:00
Jacob Pratt 4691e61f79 Rollup merge of #154352 - notriddle:emit-md, r=fmease
rustdoc: dep-info for standalone markdown inputs

Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146220#issuecomment-3936957755

r? @fmease
2026-04-13 20:12:07 -04:00
sayantn c21f4ee437 Check for AutoUpgraded intrinsics, and lint on uses of deprecated intrinsics 2026-04-12 23:33:15 +05:30
Jacob Pratt 827c27d39a Rollup merge of #154856 - bjorn3:fix_dylib_profiler_builtins, r=mati865
Fix linking two dylibs together when both depend on profiler_builtins

See the comment inside this commit for why.

Fixes a regression from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/150014 reported at [#t-compiler > 1.94 profiler_builtin linkage in dylibs](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/1.2E94.20profiler_builtin.20linkage.20in.20dylibs/with/583704962).
2026-04-08 23:03:57 -04:00
Jonathan Brouwer edddc2137d Rollup merge of #154147 - mati865:raw-dylib-extern-types, r=petrochenkov
Do not attempt generating DllImport for extern types

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/154111
2026-04-07 17:26:22 +02:00
bjorn3 642f348805 Fix linking two dylibs together when both depend on profiler_builtins
See the comment inside this commit for why.
2026-04-05 20:24:31 +02:00
Jonathan Brouwer bbe1afafb4 Rollup merge of #149868 - alexcrichton:wasm-no-allow-undefined, r=Mark-Simulacrum
rustc: Stop passing `--allow-undefined` on wasm targets

This commit updates how the linker is invoked on WebAssembly targets (all of them) to avoid passing the `--allow-undefined` flag to the linker. Historically, if I remember this correctly, when `wasm-ld` was first integrated this was practically required because at the time it was otherwise impossible to import a function from the host into a wasm binary. Or, at least, I'm pretty sure that was why this was added.

At the time, as the documentation around this option indicates, it was known that this was going to be a hazard. This doesn't match behavior on native, for example, and can easily paper over what should be a linker error with some sort of other obscure runtime error. An example is that this program currently compiles and links, it just prints null:

    unsafe extern "C" {
        static nonexistent: u8;
    }

    fn main() {
        println!("{:?}", &raw const nonexistent);
    }

This can easily lead to mistakes like rust-lang/libc#4880 and defer what should be a compile-time link error to weird or unusual behavior at link time. Additionally, in the intervening time since `wasm-ld` was first introduced here, lots has changed and notably this program works as expected:

    #[link(wasm_import_module = "host")]
    unsafe extern "C" {
        fn foo();
    }

    fn main() {
        unsafe {
            foo();
        }
    }

This continues to compile without error and the final wasm binary indeed has an imported function from the host. This program:

    unsafe extern "C" {
        fn foo();
    }

    fn main() {
        unsafe {
            foo();
        }
    }

this currently compiles successfully and emits an import from the `env` module. After this change, however, this will fail to compile with a link error stating that the `foo` symbol is not defined.
2026-04-04 17:19:09 +02:00
Michael Howell bfaf027a3b rustdoc: include index-page in dep-info 2026-03-29 19:25:50 -07:00
Ralf Jung 7881a31ccf Rollup merge of #152880 - JohnTitor:tweak-assoc-item-note, r=fmease
Tweak incorrect assoc item note

Fix rust-lang/rust#142797
r? @fmease
2026-03-28 13:15:48 +01:00
Yuki Okushi 531631c7ad Make messages more generic 2026-03-28 16:18:11 +09:00
Stuart Cook ee64422ffa Rollup merge of #154110 - lambdageek:fix/incr-compile-note, r=wesleywiser
Change "error finalizing incremental compilation" text and emit it as a note, not a warning

As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/151181#issuecomment-3762036971 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/151181#issuecomment-4068842260 the current message could be improved:

1. Right now it displays as "warning: error ..." which is confusing (is it an error or a warning)
2. It doesn't give the user a clear indication of what the consequences are
3. The _current_ build is successful. The _next_ build might be slower

The new message is now

```text
note: did not finalize incremental compilation session directory ...
  |
  = help: the next build will not be able to reuse work from this compilation
```

I started a zulip thread [#t-compiler/incremental > Ergonomics of "error finalizing incremental session"](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/241847-t-compiler.2Fincremental/topic/Ergonomics.20of.20.22error.20finalizing.20incremental.20session.22/with/580191447)
2026-03-28 15:01:38 +11:00
Aleksey Kliger 0c05f6c478 Add ignore-cross-compile to incremental-finalize-fail
The test needs proc-macros to function
2026-03-27 10:44:41 -04:00
Jacob Pratt 433e106dd2 Rollup merge of #152457 - pmur:murp/mcount-link-pg, r=davidtwco
Pass -pg to linker when using -Zinstrument-mcount

This selects a slightly different crt on gnu targets which enables the profiler within glibc.

This makes using gprof a little easier with Rust binaries. Otherwise, rustc must be passed `-Clink-args=-pg` to ensure the correct startup code is linked.
2026-03-27 02:30:06 -04:00