Stabilize or_insert_with_key
Stabilizes the `or_insert_with_key` feature from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71024. This allows inserting key-derived values when a `HashMap`/`BTreeMap` entry is vacant.
The difference between this and `.or_insert_with(|| ... )` is that this provides a reference to the key to the closure after it is moved with `.entry(key_being_moved)`, avoiding the need to copy or clone the key.
Fix overflow when converting ZST Vec to VecDeque
```rust
let v = vec![(); 100];
let queue = VecDeque::from(v);
println!("{:?}", queue);
```
This code will currently panic with a capacity overflow.
This PR resolves this issue and makes the code run fine.
Resolves#78532
Do not inline finish_grow
Fixes#78471.
Looking at libgkrust.a in Firefox, the sizes for the `gkrust.*.o` file is:
- 18584816 (text) 582418 (data) with unmodified master
- 17937659 (text) 582554 (data) with #72227 reverted
- 17968228 (text) 582858 (data) with `#[inline(never)]` on `grow_amortized` and `grow_exact`, but that has some performance consequences
- 17927760 (text) 582322 (data) with this change
So in terms of size, at least in the case of Firefox, this patch more than undoes the regression. I don't think it should affect performance, but we'll see.
doc(array,vec): add notes about side effects when empty-initializing
Copying some context from a conversation in the Rust discord:
* Both `vec![T; 0]` and `[T; 0]` are syntactically valid, and produce empty containers of their respective types
* Both *also* have side effects:
```rust
fn side_effect() -> String {
println!("side effect!");
"foo".into()
}
fn main() {
println!("before!");
let x = vec![side_effect(); 0];
let y = [side_effect(); 0];
println!("{:?}, {:?}", x, y);
}
```
produces:
```
before!
side effect!
side effect!
[], []
```
This PR just adds two small notes to each's documentation, warning users that side effects can occur.
I've also submitted a clippy proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6439
BTreeMap: clarify comments and panics around choose_parent_kv
Fixes a lie in recent code: `unreachable!("empty non-root node")` should shout "empty internal node", but it might as well be good and keep quiet
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Clarify that String::split_at takes a byte index.
To someone skimming through the `String` docs and only reads the first line, the person could interpret "index" to be "char index". Later on in the docs it clarifies, but by adding "byte" it removes that ambiguity.
Privatize some of libcore unicode_internals
My understanding is that these API are perma unstable, so it doesn't
make sense to pollute docs & IDE completion[1] with them.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/6738
We also change the specialization of `SpecFromIterNested::from_iter` for
`TrustedLen` to use `Vec::with_capacity` when the iterator has a proper size
hint, instead of `Vec::new`, avoiding calls to `grow_*` and thus
`finish_grow` in some fully inlinable cases, which would regress with
this change.
Fixes#78471.
BTreeMap: try to enhance various comments
All in internal documentation, propagating the "key-value pair" notation from public documentation.
r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
Require allocator to be static for boxed `Pin`-API
Allocators has to retain their validity until the instance and all of its clones are dropped. When pinning a value, it must live forever, thus, the allocator requires a `'static` lifetime for pinning a value. [Example from reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/jymzdw/the_story_continues_vec_now_supports_custom/gd7qak2?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3):
```rust
let alloc = MyAlloc(/* ... */);
let pinned = Box::pin_in(42, alloc);
mem::forget(pinned); // Now `value` must live forever
// Otherwise `Pin`'s invariants are violated, storage invalidated
// before Drop was called.
// borrow of `memory` can end here, there is no value keeping it.
drop(alloc); // Oh, value doesn't live forever.
```
Rename `optin_builtin_traits` to `auto_traits`
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.
There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.
Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
r? `@oli-obk` (feel free to re-assign if you're not the right reviewer for this)
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.
There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.
Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #76829 (stabilize const_int_pow)
- #79080 (MIR visitor: Don't treat debuginfo field access as a use of the struct)
- #79236 (const_generics: assert resolve hack causes an error)
- #79287 (Allow using generic trait methods in `const fn`)
- #79324 (Use Option::and_then instead of open-coding it)
- #79325 (Reduce boilerplate with the `?` operator)
- #79330 (Fix typo in comment)
- #79333 (doc typo)
- #79337 (Use Option::map instead of open coding it)
- #79343 (Add my (`@flip1995)` work mail to the mailmap)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Change slice::to_vec to not use extend_from_slice
I saw this [Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/String.3A.3Afrom%28.26str%29.20wonky.20codegen/near/216164455), and didn't see any update from it, so I thought I'd try to fix it. This converts `to_vec` to no longer use `extend_from_slice`, but relies on knowing that the allocated capacity is the same size as the input.
[Godbolt new v1](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/1bcWKG)
[Godbolt new v2 w/ drop guard](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/5jn76K)
[Godbolt old version](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/e4ePav)
After some amount of iteration, there are now two specializations for `to_vec`, one for `Copy` types that use memcpy, and one for clone types which is the original from this PR.
This is then used inside of `impl<T: Clone> FromIterator<Iter::Slice<T>> for Vec<T>` which is essentially equivalent to `&[T] -> Vec<T>`, instead of previous specialization of the `extend` function. This is because extend has to reason more about existing capacity by calling `reserve` on an existing vec, and thus produces worse asm.
Downsides: This allocates the exact capacity, so I think if many items are added to this `Vec` after, it might need to allocate whereas extending may not. I also noticed the number of faults went up in the benchmarks, but not sure where from exactly.
Yuki Okushi