Fallback to the release number as we can't get the
git commit sha as we're not in a git repository.
Fixes#55341
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
In addition to to updating Cargo's submodule and Cargo's dependencies,
this also updates Cargo's build to build OpenSSL statically into Cargo
as well as libcurl unconditionally. This removes OpenSSL build logic
from the bootstrap code, and otherwise requests that even on OSX we
build curl statically.
If the rust-enabled lldb was built, then use it when running the
debuginfo tests. Updating the lldb submodule was necessary as this
needed a way to differentiate the rust-enabled lldb, so I added a line
to the --version output.
This adds compiletest commands to differentiate between the
rust-enabled and non-rust-enabled lldb, as is already done for gdb. A
new "rust-lldb" header directive is also added, but not used in this
patch; I plan to use it in #54004.
This updates all the tests.
This patch adds a few improvements to how the build system finds
LLVM's FileCheck program.
* On Fedora, the system LLVM installs FileCheck in the "llvm"
subdirectory of the LLVM libdir. This patch teaches the build
system to look there.
* This adds a configure option to specify which llvm-config executable
to use. This is handy on systems that can parallel install multiple
versions of LLVM; for example I can now:
./configure --llvm-config=/bin/llvm-config-5.0-64
... to build against LLVM 5, rather than whatever the default
llvm-config might be.
* Finally, this adds a configure- and config.toml- option to set the
path to FileCheck. This is handy when building against an LLVM
where FileCheck was not installed. This happens on compatibility
installs of LLVM on Fedora.
Clean up dependency tracking in Rustbuild [2/2]
Make `clear_if_dirty` calls in `Builder::cargo` with stamp dependencies for the given Mode.
Continuation of #50904
Ref issue #50509
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
This commit updates the debuginfo that is encoded in all of our released
artifacts by default. Currently it has paths like `/checkout/src/...` but these
are a little inconsistent and have changed over time. This commit instead
attempts to actually define the file paths in our debuginfo to be consistent
between releases.
All debuginfo paths are now intended to be `/rustc/$sha` where `$sha` is the git
sha of the released compiler. Sub-paths are all paths into the git repo at that
`$sha`.
add llvm-readobj to llvm-tools-preview
Similar to readelf but supports more object formats (it seems). Particularly useful to inspect in detail sections (e.g. their flags) and symbols (e.g. their types).
r? @alexcrichton
cc @dvc94ch
This optionally adds lldb (and clang, which it needs) to the build.
Because rust uses LLVM 7, and because clang 7 is not yet released, a
recent git master version of clang is used.
The lldb that is used includes the Rust plugin.
lldb is only built when asked for, or when doing a nightly build on
macOS. Only macOS is done for now due to difficulties with the Python
dependency.
This allows clearing it out and building it separately from the
compiler. Since it's essentially a different and separate crate this
makes sense to do, each cargo invocation should generally happen in its
own directory.
Provide llvm-strip in llvm-tools component
Shipping this tool gives people reliable way to reduce the generated executable size.
I'm not sure if this strip tool is available from the llvm version current rust is built on. But let's take a look. @japaric
Haiku: several smaller fixes to build and run rust on Haiku
This PR combines three small patches that help Rust build and run on the Haiku platform. These patches do not intend to impact other platforms.
This commit updates the stage0 build of tools to use the libraries of the stage0
compiler instead of the compiled libraries by the stage0 compiler. This should
enable us to avoid any stage0 hacks (like missing SIMD).
Shipping this tool gives people reliable way to reduce the generated executable size.
I'm not sure if this strip tool is available from the llvm version current rust is built on. But let's take a look. @japaric
This commit expands on a previous commit to build llvm-tools as a rustup
component. It causes the llvm-tools component to be built if the
extended step is active. It also adds llvm-tools to the build manifest
so rustup can find it.
ship LLVM tools with the toolchain
this PR adds llvm-{nm,objcopy,objdump,size} to the rustc sysroot (right next to LLD)
this slightly increases the size of the rustc component. I measured these numbers on x86_64 Linux:
- rustc-1.27.0-dev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz 180M -> 193M (+7%)
- rustc-1.27.0-dev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz 129M -> 137M (+6%)
r? @alexcrichton
cc #49584
Previously, we didn't send --features to our cargo metadata invocations,
and thus missed some dependencies that we enable through the --features
mechanism.
add a dist builder to build rust-std components for the THUMB targets
the rust-std component only contains the core and compiler-builtins (+c +mem) crates
cc #49382
- I'm not entirely sure if this PR alone will produce rust-std components installable by rustup or if something else needs to be changed
- I could have done the THUMB builds in an existing builder / image; I wasn't sure if that was a good idea so I added a new image
- I could build other crates like alloc into the rust-std component but, AFAICT, that would require calling Cargo a second time (one for alloc and one for compiler-builtins), or have alloc depend on compiler-builtins (#49503 will perform that change) *and* have alloc resurface the "c" and "mem" Cargo features.
r? @alexcrichton
This is too likely to cause spurious bounces on CI; what we run may be
dependent on what ran successfully before hand (e.g. RLS features with
Clippy), which makes this not tenable. There's no good way to ignore
specifically these problematic steps so we'll just ignore everything for
the time being. We still test that a dry run worked though so largely
this is the same from a ensure-that-tests-work perspective.
Eventually we'll want to undo this commit, though, to make our tests
more accurate.
This ensures that each build will support the testing design of "dry
running" builds. It's also checked that a dry run build is equivalent
step-wise to a "wet" run build; the graphs we generate when running are
directly compared node/node and edge/edge, both for order and contents.
Marc-Antoine Perennou