Avoid stack overflow in FindExprBySpan
Fixesrust-lang/rust#153583.
Deeply nested `?` desugarings can build a very deep HIR expression spine.
When `FindExprBySpan` walks that expression during error reporting, the
recursive `visit_expr` traversal can overflow the stack before rustc emits the
actual diagnostic.
This wraps the recursive expression walk in `ensure_sufficient_stack`, which
lets the compiler report the expected E0277 instead of crashing.
Added a UI regression test for a deeply nested `?` chain.
When encountering an unmet predicate, when we point at the trait impls that do exist, if they are all for the same self type, tweak the wording to make it less verbose.
Support primitives in type info reflection
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#146922 `#![feature(type_info)]`
This PR supports {`bool`,`char`,`int`,`uint`,`float`,`str`} primitive types for feature `type_info` reflection.
r? @oli-obk
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/macro-span-caller-replacement.rs:5:17
|
LL | s = format!("{arg}");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `&str`, found `String`
...
LL | macro_with_format!();
| -------------------- in this macro invocation
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `format` which comes from the expansion of the macro `macro_with_format` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `[[u16; 3]; 2]: Bar` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-67185-2.rs:21:6
|
LL | impl Foo for FooImpl {}
| ^^^ the trait `Bar` is not implemented for `[[u16; 3]; 2]`
|
help: the following other types implement trait `Bar`
--> $DIR/issue-67185-2.rs:9:1
|
LL | impl Bar for [u16; 4] {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `[u16; 4]`
LL | impl Bar for [[u16; 3]; 3] {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `[[u16; 3]; 3]`
note: required by a bound in `Foo`
--> $DIR/issue-67185-2.rs:14:30
|
LL | trait Foo
| --- required by a bound in this trait
LL | where
LL | [<u8 as Baz>::Quaks; 2]: Bar,
| ^^^ required by this bound in `Foo`
```
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `u32: Trait` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/trait_objects_fail.rs:26:9
|
LL | foo(&10_u32);
| ^^^^^^^ the trait `Trait` is not implemented for `u32`
|
help: the trait `Trait<12>` is not implemented for `u32`
but trait `Trait<2>` is implemented for it
--> $DIR/trait_objects_fail.rs:7:1
|
LL | impl Trait<2> for u32 {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: required for the cast from `&u32` to `&dyn Trait`
```
Pointing at the `impl` definition that *could* apply given a different self type is particularly useful when it has a blanket self type, as it might not be obvious and is not trivially greppable:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `RawImpl<_>: Raw<_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:4:5
|
LL | WrongImpl::foo(0i32);
| ^^^^^^^^^ unsatisfied trait bound
|
help: the trait `Raw<_>` is not implemented for `RawImpl<_>`
but trait `Raw<[_]>` is implemented for it
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:29:1
|
LL | impl<T> Raw<[T]> for RawImpl<T> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: required by a bound in `SafeImpl`
--> $DIR/issue-62742.rs:33:35
|
LL | pub struct SafeImpl<T: ?Sized, A: Raw<T>>(PhantomData<(A, T)>);
| ^^^^^^ required by this bound in `SafeImpl`
```
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error: `E: std::error::Error` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:7:13
|
LL | fn foo() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
| -------------------------------------- required `E: std::error::Error` because of this
LL | Ok(bar()?)
| -----^ the trait `std::error::Error` is not implemented for `E`
| |
| this has type `Result<_, E>`
|
note: `E` needs to implement `std::error::Error`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:1:1
|
LL | struct E;
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= note: required for `Box<dyn std::error::Error>` to implement `From<E>`
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `X`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:18:13
|
LL | fn bat() -> Result<(), X> {
| ------------- expected `X` because of this
LL | Ok(bar()?)
| -----^ the trait `From<E>` is not implemented for `X`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<_, E>`
|
note: `X` needs to implement `From<E>`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:4:1
|
LL | struct X;
| ^^^^^^^^
note: alternatively, `E` needs to implement `Into<X>`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:1:1
|
LL | struct E;
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
```
When a `?` operation requires an `Into` conversion with additional bounds (like having a concrete error but wanting to convert to a trait object), we handle it speficically and provide the same kind of information we give other `?` related errors.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error: `E: std::error::Error` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:5:13
|
LL | fn foo() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
| -------------------------------------- required `E: std::error::Error` because of this
LL | Ok(bar()?)
| ^ the trait `std::error::Error` is not implemented for `E`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= note: required for `Box<dyn std::error::Error>` to implement `From<E>`
```
Avoid talking about `FromResidual` when other more relevant information is being given, particularly from `rust_on_unimplemented`.
Unless `try_trait_v2` is enabled, don't mention that `FromResidual` isn't implemented for a specific type when the implicit `From` conversion of a `?` fails. For the end user on stable, `?` might as well be a compiler intrinsic, so we remove that note to avoid further confusion and allowing other parts of the error to be more prominent.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `u8`
--> $DIR/bad-interconversion.rs:4:20
|
LL | fn result_to_result() -> Result<u64, u8> {
| --------------- expected `u8` because of this
LL | Ok(Err(123_i32)?)
| ------------^ the trait `From<i32>` is not implemented for `u8`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<_, i32>`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= help: the following other types implement trait `From<T>`:
`u8` implements `From<Char>`
`u8` implements `From<bool>`
```
When a trait is not implemented for a type, but there *is* an `impl`
for another type or different trait params, we format the output to
use highlighting in the same way that E0308 does for types.
The logic accounts for 3 cases:
- When both the type and trait in the expected predicate and the candidate are different
- When only the types are different
- When only the trait generic params are different
For each case, we use slightly different formatting and wording.
Remove the "which is required by `{root_obligation}`" post-script in
"the trait `X` is not implemented for `Y`" explanation in E0277. This
information is already conveyed in the notes explaining requirements,
making it redundant while making the text (particularly in labels)
harder to read.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
|
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`
|
= note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
|
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
vs the prior
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
|
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`, which is required by `Option<NotCopy>: Copy`
|
= note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
|
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
This commit starts using `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]` in the
standard library to improve some error messages. In this case we just
hide a certain nightly only impl as suggested in #121521
When we have long code skips, we write `...` in the line number gutter.
For suggestions, we were "centering" the `...` with the line, but that was consistent with what we do in every other case.
Spell out other trait diagnostic
I recently saw somebody confused about the diagnostic thinking it was suggesting to add an `as` cast. This change is longer but I think it's clearer
Expand the primary span of E0277 when the immediate unmet bound is not what the user wrote:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `i32: Bar` is not satisfied
--> f100.rs:6:6
|
6 | <i32 as Foo>::foo();
| ^^^ the trait `Bar` is not implemented for `i32`, which is required by `i32: Foo`
|
help: this trait has no implementations, consider adding one
--> f100.rs:2:1
|
2 | trait Bar {}
| ^^^^^^^^^
note: required for `i32` to implement `Foo`
--> f100.rs:3:14
|
3 | impl<T: Bar> Foo for T {}
| --- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```
Fix#40120.
When a method chain ending in `?` causes an E0277 because the
expression's `Result::Err` variant doesn't have a type that can be
converted to the `Result<_, E>` type parameter in the return type,
provide additional context of which parts of the chain can and can't
support the `?` operator.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `String`
--> $DIR/question-mark-result-err-mismatch.rs:28:25
|
LL | fn bar() -> Result<(), String> {
| ------------------ expected `String` because of this
LL | let x = foo();
| ----- this can be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<String, String>`
LL | let one = x
LL | .map(|s| ())
| ----------- this can be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<(), String>`
LL | .map_err(|_| ())?;
| ---------------^ the trait `From<()>` is not implemented for `String`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<(), ()>`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= help: the following other types implement trait `From<T>`:
<String as From<char>>
<String as From<Box<str>>>
<String as From<Cow<'a, str>>>
<String as From<&str>>
<String as From<&mut str>>
<String as From<&String>>
= note: required for `Result<(), String>` to implement `FromResidual<Result<Infallible, ()>>`
```
Fix#72124.
Scott McMurray