`OutlivesEnvironment::new` can call `OutlivesEnvironment::with_bounds`
with an empty `extra_bounds`. And once that's done,
`OutlivesEnvironmentBuilder` has a single use and can be inlined and
removed into `OutlivesEnvironment::with_bounds`.
Remove `CombineFields`
This conflicts with #131263, but if this one lands first then perhaps #131263 could then go ahead and remove all the branching on solver in `TypeRelating`. We could perhaps then rename `TypeRelating` to `OldSolverRelating` or something, idk.
r? lcnr
Fix used_underscore_binding in rustc_serialize
Hi,
This PR fixes the following clippy warnings in rustc_serialize
```
warning: used underscore-prefixed binding
--> compiler/rustc_serialize/src/opaque.rs:443:27
|
443 | debug_assert_eq!((_end_pos - _start_pos), IntEncodedWithFixedSize::ENCODED_SIZE);
| ^^^^^^^^
|
note: binding is defined here
--> compiler/rustc_serialize/src/opaque.rs:442:13
|
442 | let _end_pos = e.position();
| ^^^^^^^^
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#used_underscore_binding
= note: requested on the command line with `-W clippy::used-underscore-binding`
warning: used underscore-prefixed binding
--> compiler/rustc_serialize/src/opaque.rs:443:38
|
443 | debug_assert_eq!((_end_pos - _start_pos), IntEncodedWithFixedSize::ENCODED_SIZE);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: binding is defined here
--> compiler/rustc_serialize/src/opaque.rs:440:13
|
440 | let _start_pos = e.position();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#used_underscore_binding
```
Best regards,
Michal
Couple of changes to make it easier to compile rustc for wasm
This is a subset of the patches I have on my rust fork to compile rustc for wasm32-wasip1.
Don't allow the `#[pointee]` attribute where it doesn't belong
Error if the `#[pointee]` attribute is applied to anything but generic type parameters.
Closes#128485
Related to #123430
coverage: Multiple small tweaks to counter creation
I've been experimenting with some larger changes to how coverage counters are assigned to parts of the control-flow graph, and while none of that is ready yet, along the way I've repeatedly found myself wanting these smaller tweaks as a base.
There are no changes to compiler output.
Don't use Immediate::offset to transmute pointers to integers
This applies the relatively new `assert_matches_abi` check in the `offset` operation on immediates, which makes sure that if offsets are used to alter the layout (which is possible because the field layout is arbitrarily picked by the caller), this is not done in a way that breaks the invariant of the `Immediate` type.
This leads to ICEs in a GVN mir-opt test, so the second commit fixes GVN.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131064.
`FixupError` is isomorphic with `TyOrConstInferVar`, so this commit
changes it to just be a wrapper around `TyOrConstInferVar`.
Also, move the `Display` impl for `FixupError` next to `FixupError`.
Three of the modules don't need to be `pub`, and then
`warn(unreachable_pub)` identifies a bunch more things that also
shouldn't be `pub`, plus a couple of things that are unused.
add `naked_asm!` macro for use in `#[naked]` functions
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957
Adds the `core::arch::naked_asm` macro, to be used in `#[naked]` functions, but providing better error messages and a place to explain the restrictions on assembly in naked functions.
This PR does not yet require that the `naked_asm!` macro is used inside of `#[naked]` functions:
- the `asm!` macro can still be used in `#[naked]` functions currently, with the same restrictions and error messages as before.
- the `naked_asm!` macro can be used outside of `#[naked]` functions. It has not yet been decided whether that should be allowed long-term.
In this PR, the parsing code of `naked_asm!` now enforces the restrictions on assembly in naked functions, with the exception of checking that the `noreturn` option is specified. It also has not currently been decided if `noreturn` should be implicit or not.
This PR looks large because it touches a bunch of tests. The code changes are mostly straightforward I think: we now have 3 flavors of assembly macro, and that information must be propagated through the parsing code and error messages.
cc `@Lokathor`
r? `@Amanieu`
- fix for divergence
- fix error message
- fix another cranelift test
- fix some cranelift things
- don't set the NORETURN option for naked asm
- fix use of naked_asm! in doc comment
- fix use of naked_asm! in run-make test
- use `span_bug` in unreachable branch
Make deprecated_cfg_attr_crate_type_name a hard error
Turns the forward compatibility lint added by #83744 into a hard error, so now, while the `#![crate_name]` and `#![crate_type]` attributes are still allowed in raw form, they are now forbidden to be nested inside a `#![cfg_attr()]` attribute.
The following will now be an error:
```Rust
#![cfg_attr(foo, crate_name = "foobar")]
#![cfg_attr(foo, crate_type = "bin")]
```
This code will continue working and is not deprecated:
```Rust
#![crate_name = "foobar"]
#![crate_type = "lib"]
```
The reasoning for this is explained in #83744: it allows us to not have to cfg-expand in order to determine the crate's type and name.
As of filing the PR, exactly two years have passed since #99784 has been merged, which has turned the lint's default warning level into an error, so there has been ample time to move off the now-forbidden syntax.
cc #91632 - tracking issue for the lint
This makes it possible for other parts of counter-assignment to check whether a
node is guaranteed to end up with some kind of counter.
Switching from `impl Fn` to a concrete `&BitSet` just avoids the hassle of
trying to store a closure in a struct field, and currently there's no
foreseeable need for this information to not be a bitset.
On function and method calls in patterns, link to the book
```
error: expected a pattern, found an expression
--> f889.rs:3:13
|
3 | let (x, y.drop()) = (1, 2);
| ^^^^^^^^ not a pattern
|
= note: arbitrary expressions are not allowed in patterns: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-00-patterns.html>
error[E0532]: expected a pattern, found a function call
--> f889.rs:2:13
|
2 | let (x, drop(y)) = (1, 2);
| ^^^^ not a tuple struct or tuple variant
|
= note: function calls are not allowed in patterns: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-00-patterns.html>
```
Fix#97200.
Nicholas Nethercote