#[plugin] #[no_link] extern crate bleh;
becomes a crate attribute
#![plugin(bleh)]
The feature gate is still required.
It's almost never correct to link a plugin into the resulting library /
executable, because it will bring all of libsyntax and librustc with it.
However if you really want this behavior, you can get it with a separate
`extern crate` item in addition to the `plugin` attribute.
Fixes#21043.
Fixes#20769.
[breaking-change]
Makes the compilation abort when a parse error is encountered while
trying to parse an item in an included file. The previous behaviour was
to stop processing the file when a token that can't start an item was
encountered, without producing any error. Fixes#21146.
Fixes#21833.
[breaking-change]
r? @alexcrichton
The tests in #21912 will also need `#[feature(no_std)]`. If you're okay with both PRs, I can merge and test them.
make `for PAT in ITER_EXPR { ... }` a terminating-scope for ITER_EXPR.
In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop itself, and no longer.
----
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by @nikomatsakis (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here is that case:
```
fn main() {
let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new();
for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) }
}
```
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e., it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new striction.)
----
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]
Makes the compilation abort when a parse error is encountered while
trying to parse an item in an included file. The previous behaviour was
to stop processing the file when a token that can't start an item was
encountered, without producing any error. Fixes#21146.
The word is repeated twice in the message like:
error: obsolete syntax: `:`, `&mut:`, or `&:` syntax
This removes the word syntax that appears in messages after the second colon (:).
The word is repeated twice in the message like
error: obsolete syntax: `:`, `&mut:`, or `&:` syntax
This removes the word syntax that appears in messages after the second colon (:).
....
The 'stable_features' lint helps people progress from unstable to
stable Rust by telling them when they no longer need a `feature`
attribute because upstream Rust has declared it stable.
This compares to the existing 'unstable_features' lint, which is used
to implement feature staging, and triggers on *any* use
of `#[feature]`.
This can be considered partial work on #8256.
The main observable change: macro expansion sometimes results in spans where `lo > hi`; so for now, when we have such a span, do not attempt to return a snippet result.
(Longer term, we might think about whether we could still present a snippet for the cases where this arises, e.g. perhaps by showing the whole macro as the snippet, assuming that is the sole cause of such spans; or by somehow looking up the closest AST node that holds both `lo` and `hi`, and showing that.)
As a drive-by, revised the API to return a `Result` rather than an `Option`, with better information-packed error value that should help us (and maybe also our users) identify the causes of such problems in the future. Ideally the call-sites that really want an actual snippet would be updated to catch the newly added `Err` case and print something meaningful about it, but that is not part of this PR.
Implement step 1 of rust-lang/rfcs#702
Allows the expression `..` (without either endpoint) in general, can be
used in slicing syntax `&expr[..]` where we previously wrote `&expr[]`.
The old syntax &expr[] is not yet removed or warned for.
In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of
ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding
the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop
itself, and no longer.
----
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by
niko (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here
is that case:
```
fn main() {
let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new();
for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) }
}
```
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a
semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e.,
it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot
actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test
by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new
striction.)
----
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]
This can be considered partial work on #8256.
The main observable change: macro expansion sometimes results in spans
where `lo > hi`; so for now, when we have such a span, do not attempt
to return a snippet result.
(Longer term, we might think about whether we could still present a
snippet for the cases where this arises, e.g. perhaps by showing the
whole macro as the snippet, assuming that is the sole cause of such
spans; or by somehow looking up the closest AST node that holds both
`lo` and `hi`, and showing that.)
As a drive-by, revised the API to return a `Result` rather than an
`Option`, with better information-packed error value that should help
us (and maybe also our users) identify the causes of such problems in
the future. Ideally the call-sites that really want an actual snippet
would be updated to catch the newly added `Err` case and print
something meaningful about it, but that is not part of this PR.
The 'stable_features' lint helps people progress from unstable to
stable Rust by telling them when they no longer need a `feature`
attribute because upstream Rust has declared it stable.
This compares to the existing 'unstable_features', which is used
to implement feature staging, and triggers on *any* use
of `#[feature]`.
Allows the expression `..` (without either endpoint) in general, can be
used in slicing syntax `&expr[..]` where we previously wrote `&expr[]`.
The old syntax &expr[] is not yet removed or warned for.
Currently, if a `#![staged_api]` crate contains an exported item without a stability marker (or inherited stability),
the item is useless.
This change introduces a check to ensure that all exported items have a defined stability.
it also introduces the `unmarked_api` feature, which lets users import unmarked features. While this PR should in theory forbid these from existing,
in practice we can't be so sure; so this lets users bypass this check instead of having to wait for the library and/or compiler to be fixed (since otherwise this is a hard error).
r? @aturon
This *almost* completes the job for #16440. The idea is that even if we do not know whether some closure type `C` implements `Fn` or `FnMut` (etc), we still know its argument and return types. So if we see an obligation `C : Fn(_0)`, we can unify `_0` with those argument types while still considering the obligation ambiguous and unsatisfied. This helps to make a lot of progress with type inference even before closure kind inference is done.
As part of this PR, the explicit `:` syntax is removed from the AST and completely ignored. We still infer the closure kind based on the expected type if that is available. There are several reasons for this. First, deciding the closure kind earlier is always better, as it allows us to make more progress. Second, this retains a (admittedly obscure) way for users to manually specify the closure kind, which is useful for writing tests if nothing else. Finally, there are still some cases where inference can fail, so it may be useful to have this manual override. (The expectation is that we will eventually revisit an explicit syntax for specifying the closure kind, but it will not be `:` and may be some sort of generalization of the `||` syntax to handle other traits as well.)
This commit does not *quite* fix#16640 because a snapshot is still needed to enable the obsolete syntax errors for explicit `&mut:` and friends.
r? @eddyb as he reviewed the prior patch in this direction
Use the crates.io crate `rand` (version 0.1 should be a drop in
replacement for `std::rand`) and `rand_macros` (`#[derive_Rand]` should
be a drop-in replacement).
[breaking-change]
As part of [RFC 474](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/474), this
commit renames `std::path` to `std::old_path`, leaving the existing path
API in place to ease migration to the new one. Updating should be as
simple as adjusting imports, and the prelude still maps to the old path
APIs for now.
[breaking-change]
bors