Detects manual implementations of the newly implemented
[`BinaryHeap::pop_if()`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/151828)
in `manual_pop_if`.
I wasn't sure about how best to handle checking for the nightly feature.
Could we let people compiling with nightly know that the feature is
available even if they don't have it enabled?
changelog: [`manual_pop_if`]: detect manual implementations of
`BinaryHeap::pop_if()`
It is not necessary to materialize snippets into `String` objects just
to check if they contain comments for example.
changelog: none
r? @blyxyas
(for perf measurements)
The wrong `TypeckResults` was used in the fallback equality function
passed by the `match_same_arms` and `filter_map` lints. Previously,
those fallback functions had no way of using the proper `TypeckResults`.
Those (one per expression being compared) are now passed to the
registered fallback function.
Add a lint to detect when the recently added Vec::pop_if,
VecDeque::pop_front_if, and VecDeque::pop_back_if are manually
implemented.
changelog: add [`manual_pop_if`] lint
Parse `impl` restrictions
This PR implements the parsing logic for `impl` restrictions (e.g., `pub impl(crate) trait Foo {}`) as proposed in [RFC 3323](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3323-restrictions.html).
As the first step of the RFC implementation, this PR focuses strictly on the parsing phase. The new syntax is guarded by the `#![feature(impl_restriction)]` feature gate.
This implementation basically follows the pattern used in rust-lang/rust#141754.
r? @jhpratt
Fixesrust-lang/rust-clippy#16411
`core::panic` was missing in the formatting arg lints
changelog: fix all format-related lints to handle `core::panic!` macro
refactor(mgca): Change `DefKind::Const` and `DefKind::AssocConst` to have a `is_type_const` flag
Addresses rust-lang/rust#152940
- Changed `DefKind::Const` and `DefKind::AssocConst` to have a `is_type_const` flag.
- changed `is_type_const` query to check for this flag
- removed `is_rhs_type_const` query
r? @BoxyUwU
* refactor: add `is_type_const` flag to `DefKind::Const` and `AssocConst`
* refactor(cleanup) remove the `rhs_is_type_const` query
* style: fix formatting
* refactor: refactor stuff in librustdoc for new Const and AssocConst
* refactor: refactor clippy for the changes
* chore: formatting
* fix: fix test
* fix: fix suggestions
* Update context.rs
Co-authored-by: Boxy <rust@boxyuwu.dev>
* changed AssocKind::Const to store data about being a type const
add field representing types
*[View all comments](https://triagebot.infra.rust-lang.org/gh-comments/rust-lang/rust/pull/152730)*
> [!NOTE]
> This is a rewrite of #146307 by using a lang item instead of a custom `TyKind`. We still need a `hir::TyKind::FieldOf` variant, because resolving the field name cannot be done before HIR construction. The advantage of doing it this way is that we don't need to make any changes to types after HIR (including symbol mangling). At the very beginning of this feature implementation, I tried to do it using a lang item, but then quickly abandoned the approach, because at that time I was still intending to support nested fields.
Here is a [range-diff](https://triagebot.infra.rust-lang.org/gh-range-diff/rust-lang/rust/605f49b27444a738ea4032cb77e3bdc4eb811bab..d15f5052095b3549111854a2555dd7026b0a729e/605f49b27444a738ea4032cb77e3bdc4eb811bab..f5f42d1e03495dbaa23671c46b15fccddeb3492f) between the two PRs
---
# Add Field Representing Types (FRTs)
This PR implements the first step of the field projection lang experiment (Tracking Issue: rust-lang/rust#145383). Field representing types (FRTs) are a new kind of type. They can be named through the use of the `field_of!` macro with the first argument being the type and the second the name of the field (or variant and field in the case of an enum). No nested fields are supported.
FRTs natively implement the `Field` trait that's also added in this PR. It exposes information about the field such as the type of the field, the type of the base (i.e. the type that contains the field) and the offset within that base type. Only fields of non-packed structs are supported, fields of enums an unions have unique types for each field, but those do not implement the `Field` trait.
This PR was created in collaboration with @dingxiangfei2009, it wouldn't have been possible without him, so huge thanks for mentoring me!
I updated my library solution for field projections to use the FRTs from `core` instead of creating my own using the hash of the name of the field. See the [Rust-for-Linux/field-projection `lang-experiment` branch](https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/field-projection/tree/lang-experiment).
## API added to `core::field`
```rust
pub unsafe trait Field {
type Base;
type Type;
const OFFSET: usize;
}
pub macro field_of($Container:ty, $($fields:expr)+ $(,)?);
```
Along with a perma-unstable type that the compiler uses in the expansion of the macro:
```rust
#[unstable(feature = "field_representing_type_raw", issue = "none")]
pub struct FieldRepresentingType<T: ?Sized, const VARIANT: u32, const FIELD: u32> {
_phantom: PhantomData<T>,
}
```
## Explanation of Field Representing Types (FRTs)
FRTs are used for compile-time & trait-level reflection for fields of structs & tuples. Each struct & tuple has a unique compiler-generated type nameable through the `field_of!` macro. This type natively contains information about the field such as the outermost container, type of the field and its offset. Users may implement additional traits on these types in order to record custom information (for example a crate may define a [`PinnableField` trait](https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/field-projection/blob/lang-experiment/src/marker.rs#L9-L23) that records whether the field is structurally pinned).
They are the foundation of field projections, a general operation that's generic over the fields of a struct. This genericism needs to be expressible in the trait system. FRTs make this possible, since an operation generic over fields can just be a function with a generic parameter `F: Field`.
> [!NOTE]
> The approach of field projections has changed considerably since this PR was opened. In the end we might not need FRTs, so this API is highly experimental.
FRTs should act as though they were defined as `struct MyStruct_my_field<StructGenerics>;` next to the struct. So it should be local to the crate defining the struct so that one can implement any trait for the FRT from that crate. The `Field` traits should be implemented by the compiler & populated with correct information (`unsafe` code needs to be able to rely on them being correct).
## TODOs
There are some `FIXME(FRTs)` scattered around the code:
- Diagnostics for `field_of!` can be improved
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/nonexistent.rs`
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/non-struct.rs`
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/offset.rs`
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/not-field-if-packed.rs`
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/invalid.rs`
- Simple type alias already seem to work, but might need some extra work in `compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/hir_ty_lowering/mod.rs`
r? @oli-obk
changelog: [`borrow_deref_ref`]: do not suggest removing an explicit
reborrow when it targets an upvar captured by a closure
Fixesrust-lang/rust-clippy#16556
r? Jarcho
`IntoQueryParam` is a trait that lets query callers be a bit sloppy with
the passed-in key.
- Types similar to `DefId` will be auto-converted to `DefId`. Likewise
for `LocalDefId`.
- Reference types will be auto-derefed.
The auto-conversion is genuinely useful; the auto-derefing much less so.
In practice it's only used for passing `&DefId` to queries that accept
`DefId`, which is an anti-pattern because `DefId` is marked with
`#[rustc_pass_by_value]`.
This commit removes the auto-deref impl and makes the necessary sigil
adjustments. (I generally avoid using `*` to deref manually at call
sites, preferring to deref via `&` in patterns or via `*` in match
expressions. Mostly because that way a single deref often covers
multiple call sites.)
This removes code duplication. Also, this limits the number of places to
update when rustc lint code interface is modified to two places.
changelog: none
There is a proposal to change the behaviour of rustc's `must_use` lint
to consider `Result<T, U>` and `ControlFlow<U, T>` as `T` when `U` is
uninhabited. See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/148214>.
This might make the user adding extra `#[must_use]` attributes to
functions returning `Result<T, !>` or `ControlFlow<!, T>`, which would
trigger the `double_must_use` lint in Clippy without the current change.
changelog: [`double_muse_use`, `drop_non_drop`,
`let_underscore_must_use`]: consider `Result<T, U>` and `ControlFlow<U,
T>` as `T` wrt the `#[must_use]` attribute if `U` is uninhabited.
There is a proposal to change the behaviour of rustc's `must_use` lint
to consider `Result<T, U>` and `ControlFlow<U, T>` as `T` when `U` is
uninhabited. See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/148214>.
This might make the user adding extra `#[must_use]` attributes to
functions returning `Result<T, !>` or `ControlFlow<!, T>`, which would
trigger the `double_must_use` lint in Clippy without the current change.
Samuel Tardieu