Split Diagnostics for Uncommon Codepoints: Add Individual Identifier Types
This pull request further modifies the `uncommon_codepoints` lint, adding the individual identifier types of `Technical`, `Not_NFKC`, `Exclusion` and `Limited_Use` to the diagnostic message.
Example rendered diagnostic:
```
error: identifier contains a Unicode codepoint that is not used in normalized strings: 'ij'
--> $DIR/lint-uncommon-codepoints.rs:6:4
|
LL | fn dijkstra() {}
| ^^^^^^^
= note: this character is included in the Not_NFKC Unicode general security profile
```
Second step of #120228.
Prevent cycle in implied predicates computation
Makes #65913 from hang -> fail. I believe fail is the correct state for this test to remain for the long term.
Add newtypes for bool fields/params/return types
Fixed all the cases of this found with some simple searches for `*/ bool` and `bool /*`; probably many more
Stabilize `cfg_target_abi`
This stabilizes the `cfg` option called `target_abi`:
```rust
#[cfg(target_abi = "eabihf")]
```
Tracking issue: #80970fixes#78791resolves#80970
Add `#[rustc_no_mir_inline]` for standard library UB checks
should help with #121110 and also with #120848
Because the MIR inliner cannot know whether the checks are enabled or not, so inlining is an unnecessary compile time pessimization when debug assertions are disabled. LLVM knows whether they are enabled or not, so it can optimize accordingly without wasting time.
r? `@saethlin`
promotion: don't promote int::MIN / -1
Looks like I entirely forgot about this case when adding the div-by-zero check, which was supposed to ensure that we never promote operations that can fail...
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80619
This is a breaking change, so needs a crater run.
r? ``@oli-obk``
match lowering: Split off `test_candidates` into several functions and improve comments
The logic of `test_candidates` has three steps: pick a test, sort the candidates, and generate code for everything. So I split it off into three methods.
I also ended up reworking the comments that explain the algorithm. In particular I added detailed examples. I removed the digression about https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29740 because it's no longer relevant to how the code is structured today.
r? ``@matthewjasper``
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #121435 (Account for RPITIT in E0310 explicit lifetime constraint suggestion)
- #121490 (Rustdoc: include crate name in links for local primitives)
- #121520 (delay cloning of iterator items)
- #121522 (check that simd_insert/extract indices are in-bounds)
- #121531 (Ignore less tests in debug builds)
- #121539 (compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/tests.rs: Avoid unnecessary large move)
- #121542 (update stdarch)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/tests.rs: Avoid unnecessary large move
Fixes:
$ MAGIC_EXTRA_RUSTFLAGS=-Zmove-size-limit=4096 ./x test compiler/rustc_target
error: moving 6216 bytes
--> compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/tests.rs:17:19
|
17 | for target in all_sim_targets {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ value moved from here
|
= note: The current maximum size is 4096, but it can be customized with the move_size_limit attribute: `#![move_size_limit = "..."]`
= note: `-D large-assignments` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(large_assignments)]`
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83518
The goal is to enable the lint by default at one point. There are many cases where it needs to be allowed. But here we don't need to allow it. We can simply fix it.
I don't want to enable the lint in the file, because I don't want the "default size threshold for when a value is OK to move" to be duplicated in many places. We'll want the threshold in one central place once we enable it by default.
Account for RPITIT in E0310 explicit lifetime constraint suggestion
When given
```rust
trait Original {
fn f() -> impl Fn();
}
trait Erased {
fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()>;
}
impl<T: Original> Erased for T {
fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()> {
Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
}
}
```
emit do not emit an invalid suggestion restricting the `Trait::{opaque}` type in a `where` clause:
```
error[E0310]: the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/missing-static-bound-from-impl.rs:11:9
|
LL | Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` must be valid for the static lifetime...
| ...so that the type `impl Fn()` will meet its required lifetime bounds
```
Partially address #119773. Ideally we'd suggest modifying `Erased::f` instead.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Fixes:
$ MAGIC_EXTRA_RUSTFLAGS=-Zmove-size-limit=4096 ./x test compiler/rustc_target
error: moving 6216 bytes
--> compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/base/apple/tests.rs:17:19
|
17 | for target in all_sim_targets {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ value moved from here
|
= note: The current maximum size is 4096, but it can be customized with the move_size_limit attribute: `#![move_size_limit = "..."]`
= note: `-D large-assignments` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(large_assignments)]`
coverage: Rename `is_closure` to `is_hole`
Extracted from #121433, since I was having second thoughts about some of the other changes bundled in that PR, but these changes are still fine.
---
When refining covspans, we don't specifically care which ones represent closures; we just want to know which ones represent "holes" that should be carved out of other spans and then discarded.
(Closures are currently the only source of hole spans, but in the future we might want to also create hole spans for nested items and inactive `#[cfg(..)]` regions.)
``@rustbot`` label +A-code-coverage
Don't ICE on anonymous struct in enum variant
Fixes#121446
Computing `adt_def` for the anon struct calls `adt_def` on the parent to find its repr. If the parent is a non-item (e.g. an enum variant) we should have already emitted at least one error, so we just use the repr of the anonymous struct to avoid an ICE.
cc ``@frank-king``
mark `min_exhaustive_patterns` as complete
This is step 1 and 2 of my [proposal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119612#issuecomment-1918097361) to move `min_exhaustive_patterns` forward. The vast majority of in-tree use cases of `exhaustive_patterns` are covered by `min_exhaustive_patterns`. There are a few cases that still require `exhaustive_patterns` in tests and they're all behind references.
r? ``@ghost``
region unification: update universe of region vars
necessary for #119106. see inline comment for why this is necessary
r? `@compiler-errors` `@BoxyUwU`
When refining covspans, we don't specifically care which ones represent
closures; we just want to know which ones represent "holes" that should be
carved out of other spans and then discarded.
(Closures are currently the only source of hole spans, but in the future we
might want to also create hole spans for nested items and inactive `#[cfg(..)]`
regions.)
coverage: Use variable name `this` in `CoverageGraph::from_mir`
A tiny little improvement, extracted from #120013.
This makes it easier to see that we're manipulating the instance that is being constructed, and is a lot less verbose than `basic_coverage_blocks`.
Allow for a missing `adt_def` in `NamePrivacyVisitor`.
This was caused by 72b172bdf6 in #121206. That commit removed an early return from `analysis` when there are stashed errors. As a result, it's possible to reach privacy analysis when there are stashed errors, which means more code paths can be reached. One such code path was handled in that commit, where a `span_bug` was changed to a `span_delayed_bug`.
This commit handles another such code path uncovered by fuzzing, in much the same way.
Fixes#121455.
r? `@oli-obk`
Fix more #121208 fallout
#121208 converted lots of delayed bugs to bugs. Unsurprisingly, there were a few invalid conversion found via fuzzing.
r? `@lcnr`
fix generalizer unsoundness
I ended up getting confused while trying to flip the variances when flipping the order. Should be all right now.
This is only exploitable when generalizing if the `ambient_variance` of the relation is `Contravariant`. This can currently only be the case in the NLL generalizer which only rarely generalizes, causing us to miss this regression. Very much an issue with #121462 however.
Guillaume Gomez