This commit adds the 5f00::/16 range defined by RFC9602 to those ranges which Ipv6Addr::is_global recognises as a non-global IP. This range is used for Segment Routing (SRv6) SIDs.
Remove `#[cfg(not(test))]` gates in `core`
These gates are unnecessary now that unit tests for `core` are in a separate package, `coretests`, instead of in the same files as the source code. They previously prevented the two `core` versions from conflicting with each other.
These gates are unnecessary now that unit tests for `core` are in a
separate package, `coretests`, instead of in the same files as the
source code. They previously prevented the two `core` versions from
conflicting with each other.
Adds `const` `Ip*Addr::as_octets` methods providing reference access to
`Ip*Addr` octets contents.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/535 for accepted ACP
with a more detailed justification.
Enable `unreachable_pub` lint in core
This PR enables the [`unreachable_pub`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/listing/allowed-by-default.html#unreachable-pub) as warn in `core`, `rtstartup` and `panic_unwind`.
The motivation is similar to the compiler [MCP: Enable deny(unreachable_pub) on `rustc_*` crates](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/773#issue-2467219005) :
> "Where is this thing used?" is a question I ask all the time when reading unfamiliar code. Because of this, I generally find it annoying when things are marked with a more permissive visibility than necessary. "This thing marked pub, which other crates is it used in? Oh, it's not used in any other crates."
Another motivation is to help to lint by utilizing it in-tree and seeing it's limitation in more complex scenarios.
The diff was mostly generated with `./x.py fix --stage 1 library/core/ -- --broken-code`, as well as manual edits for code in macros, generated code and other targets.
r? libs
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features
This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.
Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.
The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.
Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
This commit adds new "Textual representation" documentation sections to
SocketAddrV4 and SocketAddrV6, by analogy to the existing
"textual representation" sections of Ipv4Addr and Ipv6Addr.
Rationale: Without documentation about which formats are actually
accepted, it's hard for a programmer to be sure that their code
will actually behave as expected when implementing protocols that
require support (or rejection) for particular representations.
This lack of clarity can in turn can lead to ambiguities and
security problems like those discussed in RFC 6942.
(I've tried to describe the governing RFCs or standards where I
could, but it's possible that the actual implementers had something
else in mind. I could not find any standards that corresponded
_exactly_ to the one implemented in SocketAddrv6, but I have linked
the relevant documents that I could find.)
merge const_ipv4 / const_ipv6 feature gate into 'ip' feature gate
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76205 has been closed a while ago, but there are still some functions that reference it. Those functions are all unstable *and* const-unstable. There's no good reason to use a separate feature gate for their const-stability, so this PR moves their const-stability under the same gate as their regular stability, and therefore removes the remaining references to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76205.
refactor: standardize duplicate processes in parser
## Summary
This PR refactors the `read_number` function to standardize duplicate code, improve readability, and enhance efficiency.
## Changes
- Merged the logic for both `max_digits` cases into a single `read_atomically` closure
- Simplified control flow and reduced code duplication
This is possible now that inline const blocks are stable; the idea was
even mentioned as an alternative when `uninit_array()` was added:
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65580#issuecomment-544200681>
> if it’s stabilized soon enough maybe it’s not worth having a
> standard library method that will be replaceable with
> `let buffer = [MaybeUninit::<T>::uninit(); $N];`
Const array repetition and inline const blocks are now stable (in the
next release), so that circumstance has come to pass, and we no longer
have reason to want `uninit_array()` other than convenience. Therefore,
let’s evaluate the inconvenience by not using `uninit_array()` in
the standard library, before potentially deleting it entirely.
arithmetic
If `max_digits.is_some()`, then we know we are parsing a `u8` or `u16`
because `read_number` is only called with `Some(3)` or `Some(4)`. Both
types fit well within a `u32` without risk of overflow. Thus, we can use
plain arithmetic to avoid extra instructions from `checked_mul` and
`checked_add`.
Rename MaybeUninit::write_slice
A step to push #79995 forward.
https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/122 also suggested to make them inherent methods, but they can't be — they'd conflict with slice's regular methods.
Mark Rousskov