Introduce #[diagnostic::on_move(message)]
cc rust-lang/rust#149862
This is a first proposal. I have deliberately kept it simpler than `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`.
Few questions/remarks:
- Do I need to move the OnMoveDirective logic into a dedicated module perhaps ? let's say into compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/on_move.rs
- No problems to depend on crates like `rustc_ast` from the borrowck ?
- Notes are not supported yet. While message and label are very static , in the sense that they are emitted in the same way from the same place in the borrowck, it is not the case for the notes. It would make the code more complex. But, I can add support for notes if it does make sense.
Suggestions are welcomed !
interpret: go back to regular string interpolation for error messages
Using the translatable diagnostic infrastructure adds a whole lot of boilerplate which isn't actually useful for const-eval errors, so let's get rid of it. This effectively reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111677. That PR effectively added 1000 lines and this PR only removes around 600 -- the difference is caused by (a) keeping some of the types around for validation, where we can use them to share error strings and to trigger the extra help for pointer byte shenanigans during CTFE, and (b) this not being a full revert of rust-lang/rust#111677; I am not touching diagnostics outside the interpreter such as all the const-checking code which also got converted to fluent in the same PR.
The last commit does something similar for `LayoutError`, which also helps deduplicate a bunch of error strings. I can make that into a separate PR if you prefer.
r? @oli-obk
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113117
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116764
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112618
This might be helpful for smart pointers to explains why they aren't Copy
and what to do instead or just to let the user know that .clone() is very
cheap and can be called without a performance penalty.
Allow merging all libcore/alloc doctests into a single binary
This is only the changes needed to *allow* merging the tests. This doesn't actually turn doctest merging on in bootstrap. I think that might be a useful follow-up, since it makes them much faster to run, but it's not without downsides because it means we'll no longer be testing that doctests have all necessary `feature()` attributes.
The motivation for this change is to run the tests with `-C instrument-coverage` and then generate a coverage report from the output. Currently, this is very expensive because it requires parsing DWARF for each doctest binary. Merging the binaries decreases the time taken from several hours to ~30 seconds.
---
There are several parts to this change, most of which are independent and I'm happy to split out into other PRs.
- Upgrade process spawning logging from debug->info so it's easier to see, including in a rustdoc built without debug symbols.
- Core doctests now support being run with `-C panic=abort`. Ferrocene needs this downstream for complicated reasons; it's a one-line change so I figured it's not a big deal.
- Downgrade errors about duplicate features from a hard error to a warning. The meaning is clear here, and doctest merging often creates duplicate features since it lifts them all to the crate root. This involves changes to the compiler but generally I expect this to be low-impact.
- Enable this new warning, as well as several related feature lints, in rustdoc. By default rustdoc doesn't lint on anything except the lints it manually adds.
- Rustdoc now treats `allow(incomplete_features)` as a crate-level attribute, just like `internal_features`. Without this, it's possible to get hard errors if rustdoc lifts features to the crate level but not `allow`s.
- Core doctests now support being built with `--merge-doctests=yes`. In particular, I removed a few `$crate` usages and explicitly marked a few doctests as `standalone_crate`.
Move `Spanned`.
It's defined in `rustc_span::source_map` which doesn't make any sense because it has nothing to do with source maps. This commit moves it to the crate root, a more sensible spot for something this basic.
r? @JonathanBrouwer
It's defined in `rustc_span::source_map` which doesn't make any sense
because it has nothing to do with source maps. This commit moves it to
the crate root, a more sensible spot for something this basic.
Replace Box<[TraitCandidate]> with &'hir [TraitCandidate<'hir>]
This PR allocates trait candidates on HIR arena and replaces `remove` with `get` in `ResolverAstLowering`. First step for rust-lang/rust#153489.
r? @petrochenkov
refactor: move `check_align` to `parse_alignment`
Part of rust-lang/rust#153101
r? @JonathanBrouwer
PS: jonathan i'm not sure about what to do with `check_align` now
- Hide common linker output behind `linker-info`
- Add tests
- Account for different capitalization on windows-gnu when removing
"warning" prefix
- Add some more comments
- Add macOS deployment-target test
- Ignore linker warnings from trying to statically link glibc
I don't know what's going on in `nofile-limit.rs` but I want no part
of it.
- Use a fake linker so tests are platform-independent
refactor(mgca): Change `DefKind::Const` and `DefKind::AssocConst` to have a `is_type_const` flag
Addresses rust-lang/rust#152940
- Changed `DefKind::Const` and `DefKind::AssocConst` to have a `is_type_const` flag.
- changed `is_type_const` query to check for this flag
- removed `is_rhs_type_const` query
r? @BoxyUwU
* refactor: add `is_type_const` flag to `DefKind::Const` and `AssocConst`
* refactor(cleanup) remove the `rhs_is_type_const` query
* style: fix formatting
* refactor: refactor stuff in librustdoc for new Const and AssocConst
* refactor: refactor clippy for the changes
* chore: formatting
* fix: fix test
* fix: fix suggestions
* Update context.rs
Co-authored-by: Boxy <rust@boxyuwu.dev>
* changed AssocKind::Const to store data about being a type const
add field representing types
*[View all comments](https://triagebot.infra.rust-lang.org/gh-comments/rust-lang/rust/pull/152730)*
> [!NOTE]
> This is a rewrite of #146307 by using a lang item instead of a custom `TyKind`. We still need a `hir::TyKind::FieldOf` variant, because resolving the field name cannot be done before HIR construction. The advantage of doing it this way is that we don't need to make any changes to types after HIR (including symbol mangling). At the very beginning of this feature implementation, I tried to do it using a lang item, but then quickly abandoned the approach, because at that time I was still intending to support nested fields.
Here is a [range-diff](https://triagebot.infra.rust-lang.org/gh-range-diff/rust-lang/rust/605f49b27444a738ea4032cb77e3bdc4eb811bab..d15f5052095b3549111854a2555dd7026b0a729e/605f49b27444a738ea4032cb77e3bdc4eb811bab..f5f42d1e03495dbaa23671c46b15fccddeb3492f) between the two PRs
---
# Add Field Representing Types (FRTs)
This PR implements the first step of the field projection lang experiment (Tracking Issue: rust-lang/rust#145383). Field representing types (FRTs) are a new kind of type. They can be named through the use of the `field_of!` macro with the first argument being the type and the second the name of the field (or variant and field in the case of an enum). No nested fields are supported.
FRTs natively implement the `Field` trait that's also added in this PR. It exposes information about the field such as the type of the field, the type of the base (i.e. the type that contains the field) and the offset within that base type. Only fields of non-packed structs are supported, fields of enums an unions have unique types for each field, but those do not implement the `Field` trait.
This PR was created in collaboration with @dingxiangfei2009, it wouldn't have been possible without him, so huge thanks for mentoring me!
I updated my library solution for field projections to use the FRTs from `core` instead of creating my own using the hash of the name of the field. See the [Rust-for-Linux/field-projection `lang-experiment` branch](https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/field-projection/tree/lang-experiment).
## API added to `core::field`
```rust
pub unsafe trait Field {
type Base;
type Type;
const OFFSET: usize;
}
pub macro field_of($Container:ty, $($fields:expr)+ $(,)?);
```
Along with a perma-unstable type that the compiler uses in the expansion of the macro:
```rust
#[unstable(feature = "field_representing_type_raw", issue = "none")]
pub struct FieldRepresentingType<T: ?Sized, const VARIANT: u32, const FIELD: u32> {
_phantom: PhantomData<T>,
}
```
## Explanation of Field Representing Types (FRTs)
FRTs are used for compile-time & trait-level reflection for fields of structs & tuples. Each struct & tuple has a unique compiler-generated type nameable through the `field_of!` macro. This type natively contains information about the field such as the outermost container, type of the field and its offset. Users may implement additional traits on these types in order to record custom information (for example a crate may define a [`PinnableField` trait](https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/field-projection/blob/lang-experiment/src/marker.rs#L9-L23) that records whether the field is structurally pinned).
They are the foundation of field projections, a general operation that's generic over the fields of a struct. This genericism needs to be expressible in the trait system. FRTs make this possible, since an operation generic over fields can just be a function with a generic parameter `F: Field`.
> [!NOTE]
> The approach of field projections has changed considerably since this PR was opened. In the end we might not need FRTs, so this API is highly experimental.
FRTs should act as though they were defined as `struct MyStruct_my_field<StructGenerics>;` next to the struct. So it should be local to the crate defining the struct so that one can implement any trait for the FRT from that crate. The `Field` traits should be implemented by the compiler & populated with correct information (`unsafe` code needs to be able to rely on them being correct).
## TODOs
There are some `FIXME(FRTs)` scattered around the code:
- Diagnostics for `field_of!` can be improved
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/nonexistent.rs`
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/non-struct.rs`
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/offset.rs`
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/not-field-if-packed.rs`
- `tests/ui/field_representing_types/invalid.rs`
- Simple type alias already seem to work, but might need some extra work in `compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/hir_ty_lowering/mod.rs`
r? @oli-obk
For the attribute `FooBar` the parser is generally called `FooBarParser`
and the kind is called `AttributeKind::FooBar`. This commit renames some
cases that don't match that pattern. The most common cases:
- Adding `Rustc` to the front of the parser name for a `rustc_*`
attribute.
- Adding `Parser` to the end of a parser name.
- Slight word variations, e.g. `Deprecation` instead of `Deprecated`,
`Pointer` instead of `Ptr`, `Stability` instead of `Stable`.
bors