Add macro matcher for `guard` fragment specifier
Tracking issue #153104
This PR implements a new `guard` macro matcher to match `if-let` guards (specifically [`MatchArmGuard`](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/blob/50a1075e879be75aeec436252c84eef0fad489f4/src/expressions/match-expr.md#match-guards)). In the upcoming PR, we can use this new matcher in the `matches!` and `assert_matches!` macros to support their use with `if-let` guards. (see #152313)
The original `Expr` used to represent a guard has been wrapped in a new `Guard` type, allowing us to carry the span information of the leading `if` keyword. However, it might be even better to include the `if` keyword in the `Guard` type as well? I've left a FIXME comment in the code.
Add `-Zsanitize=kernel-hwaddress`
The Linux kernel has a config option called `CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS` that enables `-fsanitize=kernel-hwaddress`. This is not supported by Rust.
One slightly awkward detail is that `#[sanitize(address = "off")]` applies to both `-Zsanitize=address` and `-Zsanitize=kernel-address`. Probably it was done this way because both are the same LLVM pass. I replicated this logic here for hwaddress, but it might be undesirable.
Note that `#[sanitize(kernel_hwaddress = "off")]` could be supported as an annotation on statics, but since it's also missing for `#[sanitize(hwaddress = "off")]`, I did not add it.
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/975
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/154171
cc @rcvalle @maurer @ojeda
Introduce #[diagnostic::on_move(message)]
cc rust-lang/rust#149862
This is a first proposal. I have deliberately kept it simpler than `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`.
Few questions/remarks:
- Do I need to move the OnMoveDirective logic into a dedicated module perhaps ? let's say into compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/on_move.rs
- No problems to depend on crates like `rustc_ast` from the borrowck ?
- Notes are not supported yet. While message and label are very static , in the sense that they are emitted in the same way from the same place in the borrowck, it is not the case for the notes. It would make the code more complex. But, I can add support for notes if it does make sense.
Suggestions are welcomed !
Reimplement const closures
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#106003
Best reviewed commit-by-commit
The old solver can't handle `for<'a> |x: &'a()| ()` closures in const contexts, but that feature is unstable itself, so we can just leave it to the next solver to handle.
We need a lot more tests, we're testing the bare minimum of success and failure paths right now.
r? @fee1-dead
This might be helpful for smart pointers to explains why they aren't Copy
and what to do instead or just to let the user know that .clone() is very
cheap and can be called without a performance penalty.
stop marking `deref_patterns` as an incomplete feature
This PR removes the `incomplete_feature` warning for `deref_patterns`. The reason given for this in the tracking issue (rust-lang/rust#87121) was
> Per policy, the `incomplete_feature` is supposed to stay on until the feature has an accepted RFC. We're slowly working on writing up that RFC so it'll take some more time unfortunately.
>
> I don't know of any compiler crashes it causes today. The feature should be pretty usable.
However, I could not find any evidence of such a policy. The [lint documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/listing/warn-by-default.html#incomplete-features) for `incomplete_features` also only mentions features that are more likely to cause errors.
There are also many other features without an RFC that are not considered incomplete, e.g. `macro_metavar_expr_concat`, `negative_impls` or `yeet_expr`.
The feature does not cause any known ICEs either.
The concrete motivation is to use this feature to replace `box_patterns` in the compiler and pave the way towards removing that legacy feature.
Gate #![reexport_test_harness_main] properly
Address the FIXME
Removed from `issue-43106-gating-of-builtin-attrs.rs` since that is for stable attributes only.
This would be a breaking change, search of github shows it is mostly but not always used with `#![test_runner]` which is already gated correctly.
Details:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50297
Feel free to close this issue if you think it is not worth addressing the FIXME...
Tweak some of our internal `#[rustc_*]` TEST attributes
I think I might be the one who's used the internal TEST attrs `#[rustc_{dump_predicates,object_lifetime_default,outlives,variance}]` the most in recent times, I might even be the only one. As such I've noticed some recent-ish issues that haven't been fixed so far and which keep bothering me. Moreover I have a longstanding urge to rename several of these attributes which I couldn't contain anymore.
[`#[rustc_*]` TEST attributes](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/compiler-debugging.html#rustc_-test-attributes) are internal attributes that basically allow you to dump the output of specific queries for use in UI tests or for debugging purposes.
1. When some of these attributes were ported over to the new parsing API, their targets were unnecessarily restricted. I've kept encountering these incorrect "attribute cannot be used" errors all the while HIR analysis happily & correctly dumped the requested data below it. I've now relaxed their targets.
2. Since we now have target checking for the internal attributes I figured that it's unhelpful if we still intentionally crashed on invalid targets, so I've got rid of that.
3. I've always been annoyed that most of these (very old) attributes don't contain the word `dump` in their name (rendering their purpose non-obvious) and that some of their names diverge quite a bit from the corresponding query name. I've now rectified that. The new names take longer to type but it's still absolutely acceptable imo.
---
I haven't renamed all of the TEST attributes to follow the `rustc_dump_` scheme since that's quite tedious. If it's okay with you I'd like to postpone that (e.g., `rustc_{def_path,hidden_type…,layout,regions,symbol_name}`).
I've noticed that the parsers for TEST attrs are spread across `rustc_dump.rs`, `rustc_internal.rs` & `test_attrs.rs` which is a bit confusing. Since the new names are prefixed with `rustc_dump_` I've moved their parsers into `rustc_dump.rs` but of course they are still TEST attrs. IIRC, `test_attrs.rs` also contains non-`rustc_`-TEST attrs, so we can't just merge these two files. I guess that'll sort itself out in the future when I tackle the other internal TEST attrs.
r\? Jana || Jonathan
Parse `impl` restrictions
This PR implements the parsing logic for `impl` restrictions (e.g., `pub impl(crate) trait Foo {}`) as proposed in [RFC 3323](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3323-restrictions.html).
As the first step of the RFC implementation, this PR focuses strictly on the parsing phase. The new syntax is guarded by the `#![feature(impl_restriction)]` feature gate.
This implementation basically follows the pattern used in rust-lang/rust#141754.
r? @jhpratt
make `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable` an actual `rustc_attrs` attribute
It is already named like one, but used to have its own feature gate, which this PR now removes in favor of just using `#![feature(rustc_attrs)]`.
Most of the diff is just the line number changes in `malformed-attrs.stderr`.
Implement RFC 3678: Final trait methods
Tracking: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131179
This PR is based on rust-lang/rust#130802, with some minor changes and conflict resolution.
Futhermore, this PR excludes final methods from the vtable of a dyn Trait.
And some excerpt from the original PR description:
> Implements the surface part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3678.
>
> I'm using the word "method" in the title, but in the diagnostics and the feature gate I used "associated function", since that's more accurate.
cc @joshtriplett
Revert, but without type const.
Update symbol for feature err, then update suggestion output, and lastly update tests that change because of those.
Update these new tests with the correct syntax, and few existing tests with the new outputs the merge with main added.
Fix for tidyfmt and some errors when manually resolving a merge conflicts.
Update these tests to use update error messages and type const syntax.
Update comments and error message to use new syntax instead of old type_const attribute.
Remove the type_const attribute
update some more tests to use the new syntax.
Update these test cases.
update feature gate test
Change gate logic for `mgca_type_const_syntax` to work also if `min_generic_const_args` is enabled.
Create a new feature gate that checks for the feature before expansion.
Make rustfmt handle the `type const` syntax correctly.
Add a convience method to check if a RhsKind is type const.
Rename `Const` discriminant to `Body` for `ConstItemRhsKind`
Give the `TraitItemKind` flag an enum instead of a simple bool to better describe what the flag is for.
Update formatting for these match statements.
Update clippy test to use type const syntax.
Update test to use type const syntax.
update rustfmt to match ast items.
Update clippy to match ast and hir items.
Few more test cases that used old attribute, instead of 'type const'
Update to match the output from the feature gate checks.
tidyfmt adjustments.
Update the is_type_const, so I can constrain record!(..) in encoder.rs
Update conditional compilation test.
Move the feature gate to after expansion to allow for cfg(...) to work.
Update some more tests to use the new syntax.
Update type const tests in associated-const-bindings to use new syntax.
Don't check based off the attribute, but the item here.
Update some tests outside of the const_generics folder that were using #[type_const]
update the tests in associated consts that use #[type_const] to use type const
Update these mgca tests with the type const syntax.
Add a flag to TraitItemKind for detecting type const for now. Maybe later change ItemConstRhs to have optional consts but that touches a lot more lines of code.
Don't need into for these now that it's a query.
Add is_type_const query to handle foreign def ids.
update this test to use type const syntax.
Fix logic here, we only want to lower if there is expression in this case.
Update built-in macros to use ConstItemRhsKind
Update more instance of the old ConstItemRhs.
Rename ConstItemKind to ConstItemRhsKind, I noticed there is a typed called ConstantItemKind, so add the Rhs to the name to avoid confusion.
Update lower to use ConstItemKind
Add an other helper method to check if the rhs kinda has an expr.
Update item parse to use ConstItemKind enum.
Felt the field name could a be little clear when editing a few other things.
Change the ConstItem struct see know if we have a type const or regular const.
Make sure this syntax is properly feature gated.
This is meant to be the interim successor to generic const expressions.
Essentially, const item RHS's will be allowed to do arbitrary const
operations using generics. The limitation is that these const items will
be treated opaquely, like ADTs in nominal typing, such that uses of them
will only be equal if the same const item is referenced. In other words,
two const items with the exact same RHS will not be considered equal.
I also added some logic to check feature gates that depend on others
being enabled (like oGCA depending on mGCA).
= Coherence =
During coherence, OGCA consts should be normalized ambiguously because
they are opaque but eventually resolved to a real value. We don't want
two OGCAs that have the same value to be treated as distinct for
coherence purposes. (Just like opaque types.)
This actually doesn't work yet because there are pre-existing
fundamental issues with equate relations involving consts that need to
be normalized. The problem is that we normalize only one layer of the
const item and don't actually process the resulting anon const. Normally
the created inference variable should be handled, which in this case
would cause us to hit the anon const, but that's not happening.
Specifically, `visit_const` on `Generalizer` should be updated to be
similar to `visit_ty`.
abi: add a rust-preserve-none calling convention
This is the conceptual opposite of the rust-cold calling convention and is particularly useful in combination with the new `explicit_tail_calls` feature.
For relatively tight loops implemented with tail calling (`become`) each of the function with the regular calling convention is still responsible for restoring the initial value of the preserved registers. So it is not unusual to end up with a situation where each step in the tail call loop is spilling and reloading registers, along the lines of:
foo:
push r12
; do things
pop r12
jmp next_step
This adds up quickly, especially when most of the clobberable registers are already used to pass arguments or other uses.
I was thinking of making the name of this ABI a little less LLVM-derived and more like a conceptual inverse of `rust-cold`, but could not come with a great name (`rust-cold` is itself not a great name: cold in what context? from which perspective? is it supposed to mean that the function is rarely called?)
This is the conceptual opposite of the rust-cold calling convention and
is particularly useful in combination with the new `explicit_tail_calls`
feature.
For relatively tight loops implemented with tail calling (`become`) each
of the function with the regular calling convention is still responsible
for restoring the initial value of the preserved registers. So it is not
unusual to end up with a situation where each step in the tail call loop
is spilling and reloading registers, along the lines of:
foo:
push r12
; do things
pop r12
jmp next_step
This adds up quickly, especially when most of the clobberable registers
are already used to pass arguments or other uses.
I was thinking of making the name of this ABI a little less LLVM-derived
and more like a conceptual inverse of `rust-cold`, but could not come
with a great name (`rust-cold` is itself not a great name: cold in what
context? from which perspective? is it supposed to mean that the
function is rarely called?)
`const` blocks as a `mod` item
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#149226
This adds support for writing `const { ... }` as an item in a module. In the current implementation, this is a unique AST item that gets lowered to `const _: () = const { ... };` in HIR.
rustfmt support included.
TODO:
- `pub const { ... }` does not make sense (see rust-lang/rust#147136). Reject it. Should this be rejected by the parser or smth?
- Improve diagnostics (preferably they should not mention the fake `_` ident).
Jonathan Brouwer