Don't linting `as_conversions` in proc macros
Don't linting `as_conversions` if code was generated by procedural macro.
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9657
I implemented the fix changing the lint code to be a `LateLintPass` in order to be able to use the `is_from_proc_macro` out of the box. If the reviwer thinks that it would be better to do the other way (implementing `WithSearchPat`) just let me know. I might need some help in implementing it for the `ustc_ast::ast::Expr`
changelog: [`as_conversions`] avoiding warnings in macro-generated code
Extend `explicit_iter_loop` and `explicit_into_iter_loop`
fixes#1518
Some included cleanups
* Split `for_loop` test into different files for each lint (partially).
* Move handling of some `into_iter` cases from `explicit_into_iter`.
---
changelog: Enhancement: [`explicit_iter_loop`]: Now also handles types that implement `IntoIterator`.
[#10416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10416)
changelog: Sugg: [`explicit_into_iter_loop`]: The suggestion now works on mutable references.
[#10416](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10416)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add `needless_if` lint
first off: Sorry about the large diff. Seems a ton of tests do this (understandably so).
this is basically everything I wanted in #10868, while it doesn't lint *all* unnecessary empty blocks, it lints needless if statements; which are basically the crux of the issue (for me) anyway. I've committed code that includes this far too many times 😅 hopefully clippy can help me out soon
closes#10868
changelog: New lint [`needless_if`]
Fix `diverging_sub_expression` not checking body of block
Fixes#10776
This also adds a warning to the test `ui/never_loop.rs`, not sure if this is correct or not.
changelog: [`diverging_sub_expression`]: Fix false negatives with body of block
[`unnecessary_to_owned`]: check that the adjusted type matches target
Fixes#10033.
Before this change, the lint would assume that removing the `.to_string()` in `f(&x.to_string())` would be ok if x is of some type that implements `Deref<Target = str>` and `f` takes a `&str`.
This turns out to not actually be ok if the `to_string` call is some method that exists on `x` directly, which happens if it implements `Display`/`ToString` itself.
changelog: [`unnecessary_to_owned`]: only lint if the adjusted receiver type actually matches
[`redundant_closure`]: special case inclusive ranges
Fixes#10684.
`x..=y` ranges need a bit of special handling in this lint because it desugars to a call to the lang item `RangeInclusiveNew`, where the callee span would be the same as the range expression itself, so the suggestion looked a bit weird. It now correctly suggests `RangeInclusive::new`.
changelog: [`redundant_closure`]: special case `RangeInclusive`
Adds new lint `arc_with_non_send_or_sync`
Fixes#653
Adds a new lint to check for uses of non-Send/Sync types within Arc.
```
changelog: [`arc_with_non_send_sync`]: Added a lint to detect uses of non-Send/Sync types within Arc.
```
[`useless_vec`]: lint `vec!` invocations when a slice or an array would do
First off, sorry for that large diff in tests. *A lot* of tests seem to trigger the lint with this new change, so I decided to `#![allow()]` the lint in the affected tests to make reviewing this easier, and also split the commits up so that the first commit is the actual logic of the lint and the second commit contains all the test changes. The stuff that changed in the tests is mostly just line numbers now. So, as large as the diff looks, it's not actually that bad. 😅
I manually went through all of these to find out about edge cases and decided to put them in `tests/ui/vec.rs`.
For more context, I wrote about the idea of this PR here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2262#issuecomment-1579155257 (that explains the logic)
Basically, it now also considers the case where a `Vec` is put in a local variable and the user only ever does things with it that one could also do with a slice or an array. This should catch a lot more cases, and (at least from looking at the tests) it does.
changelog: [`useless_vec`]: lint `vec!` invocations when a slice or an array would do (also considering local variables now)
`suspicious_else_formatting`: Don't warn if there is a comment between else and curly bracket
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/10273
The idea is that if the only thing after `else` and before `{` is a comment, we will not warn because, probably, the line break was "made" by rustfmt.
changelog: [`suspicious_else_formatting`]: Don't warn if the only thing between `else` and curly bracket is a comment
Centri3