Commit Graph

5316 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matthias Krüger b3d15ebb08 Rollup merge of #119853 - klensy:rustfmt-ignore, r=cuviper
rustfmt.toml: don't ignore just any tests path, only root one

Previously ignored any `tests` path, now only /tests at repo root.

For reference, https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore#_pattern_format
2024-01-11 19:42:53 +01:00
klensy aa696c5a22 apply fmt 2024-01-11 15:04:48 +03:00
bors d73bd3fb3b Auto merge of #119654 - onur-ozkan:bump-dependencies, r=clubby789
bump bootstrap dependencies

This PR removes hard-coded patch versions, updates bootstrap's dependency stack to recent versions (some of the versions were released 3-4 years ago), and removes a few dependencies from bootstrap.

Removed dependencies:

![image](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/39852038/95e86325-aea0-4055-bee5-245c144f662e)
2024-01-11 10:46:43 +00:00
onur-ozkan 8d0f888674 bump bootstrap dependencies
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2024-01-11 10:24:29 +03:00
Simonas Kazlauskas 837be0de5f bootstrap: exclude link_jobs from check_ci_llvm! checks
This option is largely there to help people to manage the memory usage
on their systems during the LLVM build. The linking phase is as usual
are the heaviest part of the build and if in an unlucky conincidence the
circumstances align to kick off N_CORES links at the same time, not even
hundreds of GiB of memory may suffice. It makes a lot of sense for
developers to set&forget this option unconditionally.

Not to mention, this option does not, in any way, affect the generated
code (at least as far as I know.) It really doesn’t matter what
option the CI build LLVM used here and/or if it matches with the user’s
configuration.

Finally, 0 actual link jobs implied by `download-ci-llvm` is guaranteed
to stay within the limits that are reasonable to set with this option.
2024-01-10 17:06:36 +02:00
Matthias Krüger 985b2ce70d Rollup merge of #119619 - onur-ozkan:panic-abort-mir-opt, r=oli-obk
mir-opt and custom target fixes

From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115642#issuecomment-1879589022

> > Could you please test the last two commits from https://github.com/onur-ozkan/rust/commits/panic-abort-mir-opt when you have the time? The first commit should resolve the error of using the nightly flag with a stable compiler, and the second one should resolve the custom target issue.

> I tested with the two commits and the errors of using nightly flag and custom target specs were not seen.
Testing was completed for the test suites like ui, run-pass-valgrind, coverage, mir-opt, codegen, assembly, incremental.

Fixes #115642
2024-01-09 05:33:22 +01:00
onur-ozkan b888e2f82b fix the incorrect target on stage1 ui-fulldeps tests
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2024-01-08 16:07:44 +03:00
onur-ozkan 8aa7dd06f6 enable RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP on panic=abort mir-opt test
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2024-01-08 16:07:30 +03:00
bors 87e1430893 Auto merge of #119556 - onur-ozkan:optimized-compiler-builtins, r=onur-ozkan
Reland optimized-compiler-builtins config

Copy of #102579 PR.

From #102579:

> No concerns on my side. Currently, Jyn isn't actively working on the project. I will close this PR; open another one to cherry-pick the commits, resolve conflicts, and then r+ it.

> Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102560. Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101172. Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105065 (although there's some weirdness there - it's still broken when optimized-compiler-builtins is set to true).

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102560. Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101172. Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105065

r? ghost
2024-01-07 11:20:08 +00:00
jyn 6a409ddbe4 add a new optimized_compiler_builtins option
in particular, this makes the `c` feature for compiler-builtins an explicit opt-in, rather than silently detected by whether `llvm-project` is checked out on disk.
exposing this is necessary because the `cc` crate doesn't support cross-compiling to MSVC, and we want people to be able to run `x check --target foo` regardless of whether they have a c toolchain available.

this also uses the new option in CI, where we *do* want to optimize compiler_builtins.

the new option is off by default for the `dev` channel and on otherwise.
2024-01-07 13:04:40 +03:00
Michael Goulet 20f22ba2ed Rollup merge of #119548 - onur-ozkan:remove-nested-target-iteration, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Use the current target instead of iterating over all targets

Since we already iterate through targets in StepDescription::maybe_run, there is no need to iterate targets again in the install step for std.

Compared the results before and after applying the changes to install step of std, and there were no differences.

```sh

  ~/devspace/.other/rustc-builds  $ sha256sum ./old/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-*
c2ea86fc25ffac87b0b135f31ba9644ad97549da4c050c3921b437d1e18285fd  ./old/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu
d2f1081a779962e2cbc27f53191783d13428abd0964465547af78ce34c7251dd  ./old/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

  ~/devspace/.other/rustc-builds  $ sha256sum ./new/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-*
c2ea86fc25ffac87b0b135f31ba9644ad97549da4c050c3921b437d1e18285fd  ./new/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu
d2f1081a779962e2cbc27f53191783d13428abd0964465547af78ce34c7251dd  ./new/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

```

Fixes #119533
2024-01-06 21:51:45 -05:00
bors 78c988fe3e Auto merge of #119035 - saethlin:remove-linker-requirement, r=onur-ozkan
Run Miri and mir-opt tests without a target linker

Normally, we need a linker for the target to build the standard library. That's only because `std` declares crate-type lib and dylib; building the dylib is what creates a need for the linker.

But for mir-opt tests (and for Miri) we do not need to build a `libstd.so`. So with this PR, when we build the standard library for mir-opt tests, instead of `cargo build` we run `cargo rustc --crate-type=lib` which overrides the configured crate types in `std`'s manifest.

I've also swapped in what seems to me a better hack than `BOOTSTRAP_SKIP_TARGET_SANITY` to prevent cross-interpreting with Miri from checking for a target linker and expanded it to mir-opt tests too. Whether it's actually better is up to a reviewer.
2024-01-07 00:32:24 +00:00
Ben Kimock 735a6a4212 Run Miri and mir-opt tests without a target linker 2024-01-06 14:17:33 -05:00
Matthias Krüger 94bfc28bcd Rollup merge of #119486 - onur-ozkan:clippy-allow-dirty-and-staged, r=Mark-Simulacrum
pass allow-{dirty,staged} to clippy

Support of Clippy's `--allow-dirty` and `--allow-staged` flags on bootstrap.

Resolves #119483
2024-01-06 16:07:47 +01:00
Michael Goulet 98ba299a48 Rollup merge of #119414 - xry111:xry111/lto-test, r=Mark-Simulacrum
bootstrap: Move -Clto= setting from Rustc::run to rustc_cargo

It prevents a full rebuild of stage 1 compiler when issuing "x.py test" with rust.lto != thin-local in config.toml.
2024-01-05 23:41:42 -05:00
Michael Goulet d180e9101d Rollup merge of #119034 - Zalathar:ignore-mode, r=davidtwco
Allow coverage tests to ignore test modes, and to enable color in coverage reports

This PR adds two new header directives to compiletest, intended for use by coverage tests (and by #119033 in particular).

The new headers are:

- `// ignore-mode-{mode}` causes a test to not be run in a particular compiletest mode (e.g. `ignore-mode-coverage-run`).
  - This can theoretically be used by any test, but coverage tests are currently the only ones that automatically run in multiple modes, so it's not very useful for other kinds of test.
- `// llvm-cov-flags: --use-color` makes `coverage-run` tests pass the flag `--use-color` when generating coverage reports.
  - For most tests, non-coloured reports are easier to read and more portable across platforms. But for #119033 specifically, we want to test that `llvm-cov` slices up source text correctly, which only happens when colour output is enabled.
2024-01-05 10:57:20 -05:00
bors a59a98024e Auto merge of #118861 - Veykril:r-a-in-tree, r=onur-ozkan
Set the `in-rust-tree` feature for all rust-analyzer{-proc-macro-srv} steps

Some context: This came up in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/libraryfying.20match.20checking.3F where `test` and `check` behaved differently for rust-analyzer
r? `@onur-ozkan`
2024-01-05 02:53:45 +00:00
Zalathar f9df1ad4f2 Check for profiler support via a flag, instead of an environment var 2024-01-05 13:42:54 +11:00
bors f688dd684f Auto merge of #119569 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-4packja, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #118521 (Enable address sanitizer for MSVC targets using INFERASANLIBS linker flag)
 - #119026 (std::net::bind using -1 for openbsd which in turn sets it to somaxconn.)
 - #119195 (Make named_asm_labels lint not trigger on unicode and trigger on format args)
 - #119204 (macro_rules: Less hacky heuristic for using `tt` metavariable spans)
 - #119362 (Make `derive(Trait)` suggestion more accurate)
 - #119397 (Recover parentheses in range patterns)
 - #119417 (Uplift some miscellaneous coroutine-specific machinery into `check_closure`)
 - #119539 (Fix typos)
 - #119540 (Don't synthesize host effect args inside trait object types)
 - #119555 (Add codegen test for RVO on MaybeUninit)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2024-01-04 21:44:14 +00:00
Lukas Wirth 9a9ba92b28 Imply sysroot-abi feature when in-rust-tree is set 2024-01-04 11:02:23 +01:00
Lukas Wirth 7b41008ee0 Set the in-rust-tree` feature for all rust-analyzer{-proc-macro-srv} steps 2024-01-04 11:02:20 +01:00
Matthias Krüger 1f32203fd3 Rollup merge of #118521 - dpaoliello:asan, r=wesleywiser
Enable address sanitizer for MSVC targets using INFERASANLIBS linker flag

This enables address sanitizer for x86_64-pc-windows-msvc and i686-pc-windows-msvc targets when linked with the MSVC linker (link.exe) by leveraging the `/INFERASANLIBS` option to automatically find and link in Microsoft's address sanitizer runtime: <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/sanitizers/asan-runtime?view=msvc-170>

Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/702
Fixes #89339 (for MSVC targets using the MSVC linker only)
Supercedes #89369

Successful x86_64-msvc build showing the sanitizer tests working: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/7228346880/job/19697628258?pr=118521
2024-01-04 08:33:21 +01:00
bors 090d5eac72 Auto merge of #119542 - lnicola:sync-from-ra2, r=lnicola
Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`

r? ghost
2024-01-04 07:23:39 +00:00
jyn 1490bbab92 add and document a new is_system_llvm abstraction 2024-01-03 23:30:35 +03:00
Daniel Paoliello bc3b7c9930 Enable address sanitizer for MSVC targets using INFERASANLIBS linker flag 2024-01-03 10:00:15 -08:00
León Orell Valerian Liehr 907922b472 Rollup merge of #119298 - onur-ozkan:silence-change-tracker-warning-for-ci, r=Mark-Simulacrum
suppress change-tracker warnings in CI containers

Fixes #119296
2024-01-03 16:08:24 +01:00
onur-ozkan 15bb29ecf5 Use the current target instead of iterating over all targets.
Since we already iterate through targets in StepDescription::maybe_run, there is no need to
iterate targets again in the install step for std.

Compared the results before and after applying the changes to install step of std, and there were no differences.

```sh

  ~/devspace/.other/rustc-builds  $ sha256sum ./old/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-*
c2ea86fc25ffac87b0b135f31ba9644ad97549da4c050c3921b437d1e18285fd  ./old/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu
d2f1081a779962e2cbc27f53191783d13428abd0964465547af78ce34c7251dd  ./old/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

  ~/devspace/.other/rustc-builds  $ sha256sum ./new/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-*
c2ea86fc25ffac87b0b135f31ba9644ad97549da4c050c3921b437d1e18285fd  ./new/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu
d2f1081a779962e2cbc27f53191783d13428abd0964465547af78ce34c7251dd  ./new/usr/local/lib/rustlib/manifest-rust-std-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

```

Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2024-01-03 17:57:25 +03:00
Laurențiu Nicola b91d1c0cf9 Add proc_macro_def_site to r-a ALLOW_FEATURES 2024-01-03 11:37:06 +02:00
onur-ozkan 96bd9cdcc4 pass allow-{dirty,staged} to clippy
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2024-01-01 09:41:39 +03:00
Urgau a236bdd77f bootstrap: extract --check-cfg arg generation and add unit tests for it 2023-12-30 18:10:28 +01:00
Urgau df375765b9 Simplify bootstrap check-cfg arguments 2023-12-30 15:20:24 +01:00
onur-ozkan 48309f4c9f apply bootstrap lock unconditionally
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2023-12-30 00:50:19 +03:00
onur-ozkan ca9950d3a0 bootstrap: bump fd-lock
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2023-12-30 00:43:11 +03:00
Xi Ruoyao 786e0bb1dc bootstrap: Move -Clto= setting from Rustc::run to rustc_cargo
It prevents a full rebuild of stage 1 compiler when issuing "x.py test"
with rust.lto != thin-local in config.toml.
2023-12-30 02:54:40 +08:00
bors 29abb90bbf Auto merge of #119373 - Kobzol:missing-tools-bootstrap, r=onur-ozkan
Remove usage of deprecated `missing-tools` bootstrap flag

This PR removes the usage of `--enable-missing-tools` in CI, as this config option is no longer used. It also removes `dist.missing-tools` config completely.

Let me know which commits should I remove (if any).

Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79249

r? `@onur-ozkan`
2023-12-29 16:35:36 +00:00
onur-ozkan 8dd6faca46 don't return suggestion message if no changes detected
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2023-12-29 10:45:58 +03:00
Jakub Beránek fdeb8c5027 Remove is_optional_tool from ToolBuild 2023-12-28 20:23:16 +01:00
Jakub Beránek 0e7f9ec2ca Add change tracker entry 2023-12-28 20:23:12 +01:00
Jakub Beránek 8763f7ae7d Remove --enable-missing-tools from configure.py 2023-12-28 16:08:39 +01:00
onur-ozkan 12190e5dd2 utilize the unused llvm-tools option
This field was not functioning as described in its comment in `config.example.toml`.
Also, updated the default value to `true` to keep the bootstrapping behavior as it was before.

Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2023-12-28 17:27:59 +03:00
Guillaume Gomez 51dff45aa3 Update sysinfo version to 0.30.1 2023-12-25 22:44:49 +01:00
onur-ozkan c350d3c5dd bootstrap: use same make flags with rustdoc
Keeping same `MAKEFLAGS` and `MFLAGS` for rustdoc
should allow rustdoc to use the same jobserver.

Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2023-12-25 14:55:22 +03:00
Weihang Lo e6412f277a bootstrap: build doc for `cargo-util-schemas 2023-12-22 17:13:35 -05:00
Matthias Krüger 6516e595c0 Rollup merge of #119182 - GuillaumeGomez:update-sysinfo, r=onur-ozkan
Update sysinfo version to 0.30.0

Following last `sysinfo` update. Nothing much needs to be changed here apparently.

r? `@onur-ozkan`
2023-12-21 16:43:08 +01:00
Matthias Krüger c644d00285 Rollup merge of #119124 - onur-ozkan:help-118861, r=Mark-Simulacrum
don't build `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` on def config

Should be very easy to understand when reviewing commit-by-commit.

Blocker for #118861
2023-12-21 16:43:07 +01:00
onur-ozkan 1f141dc0b8 add a new change in change-tracker
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2023-12-21 16:08:14 +03:00
Guillaume Gomez c3ede70d35 Update sysinfo version to 0.30.0 2023-12-21 12:17:49 +01:00
onur-ozkan 4ba1487e15 implement remapper for build paths
In config.toml we use `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` for building `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv`,
however, when we attempt to build it from the terminal, this cannot be used because we need to
use the actual path, which is `proc-macro-srv-cli`. Remapping should end this confusion with
improving the development experience.

Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2023-12-19 18:28:41 +03:00
onur-ozkan 57bfbfa897 don't build rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv on def config
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
2023-12-19 18:09:46 +03:00
bors e719b6fc40 Auto merge of #118946 - onur-ozkan:fix-clean, r=clubby789
fix `x clean` for cross-compiled artifacts

```toml
build = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
host = ["arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf"]
target = ["arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf"]
```

On `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`, after cross-compiling with the sample configuration above, artifacts under `build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` never gets cleaned with `x clean`. This PR fixes that.
2023-12-18 22:42:16 +00:00