4e3b7a1e31
Rollup merge of #149409 - cezarbbb:stable_ssp, r=SparrowLii
...
Test the coexistence of 'stack-protector' and 'safe-stack'
This is a test to detect the coexistence of 'stack-protector' and 'safe-stack', and it's a supplement to pr rust-lang/rust#147115 . After the solution to issue rust-lang/rust#149340 , I rewrote a version using minicore to circumvent the 'abi_mismatch' error.
r? `@SparrowLii` (Do you have time to review it?)
2025-11-29 21:12:26 +11:00
0a712d2b14
Rollup merge of #147115 - cezarbbb:stable_ssp, r=SparrowLii
...
More robust stack protector testing
I've added some tests related to the stack protector. These tests were originally in the LLVM stack protector test project.
These tests were written for the "Stabilize stack-protector" proposal, and therefore removed the "stack-protector=basic" test option, as this stack protector was considered ineffective in Rust.
For the proposal, see: rust-lang/rust#146369
For the discussion, see zulip: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/233931-t-compiler.2Fmajor-changes/topic/Proposal.20for.20Adapt.20Stack.20Protector.20for.20Ru.E2.80.A6.20compiler-team.23841
I have opened an issue to discuss the 'abi_mismatch' issue I encountered while writing tests for the coexistence of 'stack-protector' and 'safe-stack': https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/149340
r? `@wesleywiser` (feel free to reassign)
cc `@nikic,` `@rcvalle,` `@davidtwco,` `@arielb1,` `@Darksonn,` `@Noratrieb,` `@SparrowLii`
2025-11-27 12:36:47 +11:00
Stuart Cook