automate gpu offloading - part 1
Automates step 1 from the rustc-dev-guide offload section:
https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/offload/usage.html#compile-instructions
`"clang-offload-packager" "-o" "host.out" "--image=file=device.bc,triple=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa,arch=gfx90a,kind=openmp"`
Verified on an MI 250X
cc `@jhuber6,` `@kevinsala,` `@jdoerfert,` `@Sa4dUs`
r? oli-obk
Add LLVM realtime sanitizer
This is a new attempt at adding the [LLVM real-time sanitizer](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/RealtimeSanitizer.html) to rust.
Previously this was attempted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3766.
Since then the `sanitize` attribute was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142681 and it is a lot more flexible than the old `no_santize` attribute. This allows adding real-time sanitizer without the need for a new attribute, like it was proposed in the RFC. Because i only add a new value to a existing command line flag and to a attribute i don't think an MCP is necessary.
Currently real-time santizer is usable in rust code with the [rtsan-standalone](https://crates.io/crates/rtsan-standalone) crate. This downloads or builds the sanitizer runtime and then links it into the rust binary.
The first commit adds support for more detailed sanitizer information.
The second commit then actually adds real-time sanitizer.
The third adds a warning against using real-time sanitizer with async functions, cloures and blocks because it doesn't behave as expected when used with async functions. I am not sure if this is actually wanted, so i kept it in a seperate commit.
The fourth commit adds the documentation for real-time sanitizer.
This makes it clearer that it is set by the build system rather than by
the rustc that compiles the current rustc. It also avoids bootstrap
needing to pass --check-cfg llvm_enzyme to rustc.
A lot of places had special handling just in case they would get an
allocator module even though most of these places could never get one or
would have a trivial implementation for the allocator module. Moving all
handling of the allocator module to a single place simplifies things a
fair bit.
Don't export them from cdylibs. There is no need to do so and it
complicates exported_non_generic_symbols. In addition the GCC backend
likely uses different symbols and may potentially not even need us to
explicitly tell it to export the symbols it needs.
Remove `LlvmArchiveBuilder` and supporting code/bindings
Switching over to the newer Rust-based `ArArchiveBuilder` happened in rust-lang/rust#128936, a year ago.
Per the comment in `new_archive_builder`, that seems like enough time to justify removing the older, unused `LlvmArchiveBuilder` implementation and its associated bindings.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#128955.
cg_llvm: Small cleanups to `owned_target_machine`
This PR contains a few tiny cleanups to the `owned_target_machine` code.
Each individual commit should be fairly straightforward.
As noted in the `ffi` module docs, passing pointer/length byte strings from
Rust to C++ is easier if we declare them as `*const c_uchar` on the Rust side,
but `const char *` (possibly signed) on the C++ side. This is allowed because
both pointer types are ABI-compatible, regardless of char signedness.
It used to be necessary on Apple platforms to ship with the App Store,
but XCode 15 has stopped embedding LLVM bitcode and the App Store no
longer accepts apps with bitcode embedded.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#144072 (update `Atomic*::from_ptr` and `Atomic*::as_ptr` docs)
- rust-lang/rust#144151 (`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [1/N])
- rust-lang/rust#144300 (Clippy fixes for miropt-test-tools)
- rust-lang/rust#144399 (Add a ratchet for moving all standard library tests to separate packages)
- rust-lang/rust#144472 (str: Mark unstable `round_char_boundary` feature functions as const)
- rust-lang/rust#144503 (Various refactors to the codegen coordinator code (part 3))
- rust-lang/rust#144530 (coverage: Infer `instances_used` from `pgo_func_name_var_map`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Nobody seems to actually use this, while still adding some extra
complexity to the already rather complex codegen coordinator code.
It is also not supported by any backend other than the LLVM backend.
Stuart Cook