The current `rust-version = "1.63"` was inherited from rayon, but it
doesn't make sense to limit this in the compiler workspace. Having any
setting at all has effects on tools like `cargo info` that try to infer
the MSRV when the workspace itself doesn't specify it. Since we are the
compiler, our only MSRV is whatever bootstrapping requires.
Make suggestions to remove params and super traits tool-only, and make
the suggestion span more accurate.
```
error[E0567]: auto traits cannot have generic parameters
--> $DIR/auto-trait-validation.rs:6:19
|
LL | auto trait Generic<T> {}
| -------^^^
| |
| auto trait cannot have generic parameters
error[E0568]: auto traits cannot have super traits or lifetime bounds
--> $DIR/auto-trait-validation.rs:8:20
|
LL | auto trait Bound : Copy {}
| ----- ^^^^
| |
| auto traits cannot have super traits or lifetime bounds
```
```
error[E0380]: auto traits cannot have associated items
--> $DIR/issue-23080.rs:5:8
|
LL | unsafe auto trait Trait {
| ----- auto traits cannot have associated items
LL | fn method(&self) {
| ^^^^^^
```
Spotted while reading through the new lints in the changelog for Clippy
1.89:
```
1 | error: infallible TryFrom impl; consider implementing From, instead
| ^ this comma looks out of place
```
---
changelog: [`infallible_try_from`]: Fix a typo in the lint message
UEFI networking APIs do support vectored read/write. While the types for
UDP4, UDP6, TCP4 and TCP6 are defined separately, they are essentially
the same C struct. So we can map IoSlice and IoSliceMut to have the same
binary representation.
Since all UEFI networking types for read/write are DSTs, `IoSlice` and
`IoSliceMut` will need to be copied to the end of the transmit/receive
structures. So having the same binary representation just allows us to
do a single memcpy instead of having to loop and set the DST.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
This stress test was originally introduced in
65cca4bd3f to detect a UAF in libuv (see
RUST-12823), but we no longer use libuv, so remove this test as it was
causing flaky timeout failures. See RUST-144878 for discussion.
The `--enable-offload` and `--enable--enzyme` arguments don't seem to work.
Changing them to `--enable-llvm-offload` and `--enable-llvm-enzyme` resulted in the `boostrap.toml` file generating succesfully.
Violets are red,
Roses are blue,
As August winds whisper,
Take a chance, then rest too.
<hr>
Appreciate it as always @xFrednet
<img width="601" height="744" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a0e4af41-da97-4565-881b-549ed51d7fc5"
/>
<hr>
Cats for the next release can be traditionally nominated in the comments
:D
Please be more active and cat-minded 😻
changelog: none
r? flip1995
Rollup of 2 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#144694 (Distinguish prepending and replacing self ty in predicates)
- rust-lang/rust#144875 (Add some pre-codegen MIR tests for debug mode)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Distinguish prepending and replacing self ty in predicates
There are two kinds of functions called `with_self_ty`:
1. Prepends the `Self` type onto an `ExistentialPredicate` which lacks it in its internal representation.
2. Replaces the `Self` type of an existing predicate, either for diagnostics purposes or in the new trait solver when normalizing that self type.
This PR distinguishes these two because I often want to only grep for one of them. Namely, let's call it `with_replaced_self_ty` when all we're doing is replacing the self type.
Add some pre-codegen MIR tests for debug mode
No functional changes; just some tests.
I made these for rust-lang/rust#144483, but that's going in a different direction, so I wanted to propose we just add them to help see the impact of other related changes in the future.
r? mir
Distinguish prepending and replacing self ty in predicates
There are two kinds of functions called `with_self_ty`:
1. Prepends the `Self` type onto an `ExistentialPredicate` which lacks it in its internal representation.
2. Replaces the `Self` type of an existing predicate, either for diagnostics purposes or in the new trait solver when normalizing that self type.
This PR distinguishes these two because I often want to only grep for one of them. Namely, let's call it `with_replaced_self_ty` when all we're doing is replacing the self type.
Josh Stone