tests: Test line number in debuginfo for diverging function calls
Closesrust-lang/rust#59558 which just [E-needs-test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59558#issuecomment-1322236891).
The bug seems to have been fixed in **nightly-2021-05-10**:
```sh
for toolchain in nightly-2021-05-09 \
nightly-2021-05-10 \
1.88; do
echo -e "\nWith $toolchain:"
rustc +$toolchain tests/codegen/diverging-function-call-debuginfo.rs --emit llvm-ir -o /tmp/out.ll -g -Clto -Copt-level=0
build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/ci-llvm/bin/FileCheck --input-file /tmp/out.ll tests/codegen/diverging-function-call-debuginfo.rs --check-prefix=CHECK --dump-input-context 10 2>/dev/null && echo OK || echo FAIL
done
```
```
With nightly-2021-05-09:
FAIL
With nightly-2021-05-10:
OK
With 1.88:
OK
```
which gives the following list of candidate commits. Not clear which one it is exactly but it doesn't matter much since we can confirm that the test works. I have confirmed locally that with **nightly-2021-05-09** we get `line: 0` for the last call.
<details>
<summary>click to expand</summary>
```
$ git log ^881c1ac408d93bb7adaa3a51dabab9266e82eee8 ca82264ec7 --no-merges --oneline
```
f25aa5767f Remove unused `opt_span_warn` function
ebbc949575 Note why `Handler::fatal` is different from `Sesssion::fatal`
96509b4835 Make `Diagnostic::span_fatal` unconditionally raise an error
e49f4471aa Remove some unnecessary uses of `struct_span_fatal`
955fdaea4a Rename `Parser::span_fatal_err` -> `Parser::span_err`
4b7c8b0b53 Add `#[track_caller]` to `FakeDefId::expect_real()`
ba13225ba1 Remove `FakeDefId::expect_local()`
020d83d9f5 Enable `-W semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros` in bootstrap
1b928ff8f8 Update LLVM submodule
c2b15a6b64 Support -C passes in NewPM
5519cbfe33 Don't force -O1 with ThinLTO
7c4989ab70 Drop -opt-bisect-limit=0 flag from test
db140de8f2 Explicitly register GCOV profiling pass as well
5ecbe7fcf8 Explicitly register instrprof pass
0318883cd6 Make -Z new-llvm-pass-manager an Option<bool>
0367e24f94 Avoid predecessors having Drop impls
</details>
expand: Micro-optimize prelude injection
Use `splice` to avoid shifting the other items twice.
Put `extern crate std;` first so it's already resolved when we resolve `::std::prelude::rust_20XX`.
coverage: Treat `#[automatically_derived]` as `#[coverage(off)]`
One of the contributing factors behind https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141577#issuecomment-3120667286 was the presence of derive-macro-generated code containing nested closures.
Coverage instrumentation already has a heuristic for skipping code marked with `#[automatically_derived]` (rust-lang/rust#120185), because derived code is usually not worth instrumenting, and also has a tendency to trigger vexing edge-case bugs in coverage instrumentation or coverage codegen.
However, the existing heuristic only applied to the associated items directly within an auto-derived impl block, and had no effect on closures or nested items within those associated items.
This PR therefore extends the search for `#[coverage(..)]` attributes to also treat `#[automatically_derived]` as an implied `#[coverage(off)]` for the purposes of coverage instrumentation.
---
This change doesn’t rule out an entire category of bugs, because it only affects code that actually uses the auto-derived attribute. But it should reduce the overall chance of edge-case macro span bugs being observed in the wild.
Add a test case for the issue #129882
It ensures that using the `generic_const_exprs` feature in a library crate without enabling it in a dependent crate does not lead to an ICE.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129882.
feat: Right align line numbers
As part of my work on getting `annotate-snipptes` to be used as `rustc`'s renderer, I realized that `rustc` left-aligned line numbers, while `annotate-snippets` right-aligned them. This PR switches `rustc` to right-align the line numbers, matching `annotate-snippets`. In practice, this change isn't very noticeable in day-to-day output, as it only shows up when a diagnostic span contains line numbers with different lengths (9->10, 99->100, 999->1000, etc.).
`rustc`
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `F` in this scope
--> $DIR/ui-testing-optout.rs:92:10
|
4 | type A = B;
| ----------- similarly named type alias `A` defined here
...
92 | type E = F;
| ^ help: a type alias with a similar name exists: `A`
```
`annotate-snippets`
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `F` in this scope
--> $DIR/ui-testing-optout.rs:92:10
|
4 | type A = B;
| ----------- similarly named type alias `A` defined here
...
92 | type E = F;
| ^ help: a type alias with a similar name exists: `A`
```
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Ensure external paths passed via flags end up in rustdoc depinfo
rustdoc has many flags to pass external HTML/Markdown/CSS files that end up in the build. These need to be recorded in depinfo so that Cargo will rebuild the crate if they change.
thread name in stack overflow message
Fixesrust-lang/rust#144481, which is caused by the thread name not being initialised yet when setting up the stack overflow information. Unfortunately, the stack overflow UI test did not test for the correct thread name being present, and testing this separately didn't occur to me when writing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140628.
This PR contains the smallest possible fix I could think of: passing the thread name explicitly to the platform thread creation function. In the future I'd very much like to explore some possibilities around merging the thread packet and thread handle into one structure and using that in the platform code instead – but that's best left for another PR.
This PR also amends the stack overflow test to check for thread names, so we don't run into this again.
``@rustbot`` label +beta-nominated
fix(debuginfo): disable overflow check for recursive non-enum types
Commit b10edb4 introduce an overflow check when generating debuginfo for expanding recursive types. While this check works correctly for enums, it can incorrectly prune valid debug information for structures.
For example see rust-lang/rust#143241 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143241#issuecomment-3073721477). Furthermore, for structures such check does not make sense, since structures with recursively expanding types simply will not compile (there is a `hir_analysis_recursive_generic_parameter` for that).
closesrust-lang/rust#143241
Implementation: `#[feature(sync_nonpoison)]`, `#[feature(nonpoison_mutex)]`
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134663
Tracking Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134645
This PR implements a new `sync/nonpoison` module, as well as the `nonpoison` variant of the `Mutex` lock.
There are 2 main changes here, the first is the new `nonpoison::mutex` module, and the second is the `mutex` integration tests.
For the `nonpoison::mutex` module, I did my best to align it with the current state of the `poison::mutex` module. This means that several unstable features (`mapped_lock_guards`, `lock_value_accessors`, and `mutex_data_ptr`) are also in the new `nonpoison::mutex` module, under their respective feature gates. Everything else in that file is under the correct feature gate (`#[unstable(feature = "nonpoison_mutex", issue = "134645")]`).
Everything in the `nonpoison::mutex` file is essentially identical in spirit, as we are simply removing the error case from the original `poison::mutex`.
The second big change is in the integration tests. I created a macro called that allows us to duplicate tests that are "generic" over the different mutex types, in that the poison mutex is always `unwrap`ped.
~~I think that there is an argument against doing this, as it can make the tests a bit harder to understand (and language server capabilities are weaker within macros), but I think the benefit of code deduplication here is worth it. Note that it is definitely possible to generalize this (with a few tweaks) to testing the other `nonpoison` locks when they eventually get implemented, but I'll leave that for a later discussion.~~
Adds the equivalent `nonpoison` types to the `poison::mutex` module.
These types and implementations are gated under the `nonpoison_mutex`
feature gate.
Also blesses the ui tests that now have a name conflicts (because these
types no longer have unique names). The full path distinguishes the
different types.
Co-authored-by: Aandreba <aandreba@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
The bug was triggered by a particular usage of the `?` try operator in a
proc-macro expansion.
Thanks to lqd for the minimization.
Co-authored-by: Rémy Rakic <remy.rakic+github@gmail.com>
rustdoc has many flags to pass external HTML/Markdown/CSS files that end
up in the build. These need to be recorded in depinfo so that Cargo will
rebuild the crate if they change.
Use `splice` to avoid shifting the other items twice.
Put `extern crate std;` first so it's already resolved when we resolve `::std::prelude::rust_20XX`.
Allow more MIR SROA
This removes some guards on SROA that are no longer needed:
- With https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/838 it no longer needs to check for SIMD
- With https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/807 it no longer needs to check for niches
- This means that `Wrapper(char)` and `Pin<&mut T>` can get SRoA'd now, where previously they weren't because the check was banning SRaA for anything with a niche -- not just things with `#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_*]`.
- Technically rust-lang/rust#133652 isn't complete yet, but `NonZero` and `NonNull` have already moved over, so this is fine. At worst this will mean that LLVM gets less `!range` metadata on something that wasn't already fixed by rust-lang/rust#133651 or rust-lang/rust#135236, but that's still sound, and unblocking general SRoA is worth that tradeoff.
`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [1/N]
I believe I’ve finally brought [my program](https://github.com/Kivooeo/test-manager) to life -- it now handles multiple test moves in one go: plain moves first, then a gentle touch on each file depends on given options. The process should be much smoother now.
Of course, I won’t rush through everything in a few days -- that would be unkind to `@Oneirical.` I’ll pace myself. And also I can't have more than one such PR because `issues.txt` will conflict with previous parts after merging them which is not fun as well.
This PR is just that: first commit - moves; second - regression comments and the occasional .stderr reblesses, also issue.txt and tidy changes. Nothing special, but progress nonetheless. This is for the purpose of preserving test file history during restructuring
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133895.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Scott McMurray