feat: Right align line numbers
As part of my work on getting `annotate-snipptes` to be used as `rustc`'s renderer, I realized that `rustc` left-aligned line numbers, while `annotate-snippets` right-aligned them. This PR switches `rustc` to right-align the line numbers, matching `annotate-snippets`. In practice, this change isn't very noticeable in day-to-day output, as it only shows up when a diagnostic span contains line numbers with different lengths (9->10, 99->100, 999->1000, etc.).
`rustc`
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `F` in this scope
--> $DIR/ui-testing-optout.rs:92:10
|
4 | type A = B;
| ----------- similarly named type alias `A` defined here
...
92 | type E = F;
| ^ help: a type alias with a similar name exists: `A`
```
`annotate-snippets`
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `F` in this scope
--> $DIR/ui-testing-optout.rs:92:10
|
4 | type A = B;
| ----------- similarly named type alias `A` defined here
...
92 | type E = F;
| ^ help: a type alias with a similar name exists: `A`
```
r? ``@compiler-errors``
fix(debuginfo): disable overflow check for recursive non-enum types
Commit b10edb4 introduce an overflow check when generating debuginfo for expanding recursive types. While this check works correctly for enums, it can incorrectly prune valid debug information for structures.
For example see rust-lang/rust#143241 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143241#issuecomment-3073721477). Furthermore, for structures such check does not make sense, since structures with recursively expanding types simply will not compile (there is a `hir_analysis_recursive_generic_parameter` for that).
closesrust-lang/rust#143241
Ensure correct aligement of rustc_hir::Lifetime on platforms with lower default alignments.
The compiler relies on `hir::Lifetime` being aligned to at least 4 bytes(for the purposes of pointer tagging).
However, on some systems(like m68k) with lower alignment requirements(eg. usize / u32 aligned to 2 bytes),`hir::Lifetime` will be aligned to only 2 bytes.
This causes the compilation to fail on those systems - a const assert in the compiler fails.
This PR makes the aligement requriement of hir::Lifetime explict. This has no effect on platforms where that already is the case(repr align can only raise alignment), but ensures the alignment will stay correct no matter what.
Rename impl_of_method and trait_of_item
This PR used to tweak the implementation of impl_of_method, but that introduced a perf regression.
Rename impl_of_method and trait_of_item to impl_of_assoc and trait_of_assoc respectively. This reflects how the two functions are closely related. And it reflects the behavior more accurately as the functions check whether the input is an associated item.
Use `splice` to avoid shifting the other items twice.
Put `extern crate std;` first so it's already resolved when we resolve `::std::prelude::rust_20XX`.
Tracks association between `self.sess.opts.externs` (aliases in `--extern alias=rlib`) and resolved `CrateNum`
Intended to allow Rustdoc match the aliases in `--extern-html-root-url`
Force-injected extern crates aren't included, since they're meant for the linker only
Allow more MIR SROA
This removes some guards on SROA that are no longer needed:
- With https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/838 it no longer needs to check for SIMD
- With https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/807 it no longer needs to check for niches
- This means that `Wrapper(char)` and `Pin<&mut T>` can get SRoA'd now, where previously they weren't because the check was banning SRaA for anything with a niche -- not just things with `#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_*]`.
- Technically rust-lang/rust#133652 isn't complete yet, but `NonZero` and `NonNull` have already moved over, so this is fine. At worst this will mean that LLVM gets less `!range` metadata on something that wasn't already fixed by rust-lang/rust#133651 or rust-lang/rust#135236, but that's still sound, and unblocking general SRoA is worth that tradeoff.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#144072 (update `Atomic*::from_ptr` and `Atomic*::as_ptr` docs)
- rust-lang/rust#144151 (`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [1/N])
- rust-lang/rust#144300 (Clippy fixes for miropt-test-tools)
- rust-lang/rust#144399 (Add a ratchet for moving all standard library tests to separate packages)
- rust-lang/rust#144472 (str: Mark unstable `round_char_boundary` feature functions as const)
- rust-lang/rust#144503 (Various refactors to the codegen coordinator code (part 3))
- rust-lang/rust#144530 (coverage: Infer `instances_used` from `pgo_func_name_var_map`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
coverage: Infer `instances_used` from `pgo_func_name_var_map`
In obscure circumstances involving macro-expanded spans, we would sometimes emit a covfun record for a function with no physical coverage counters, and therefore no corresponding entry in the “PGO names” section of the binary. The absence of that name entry causes `llvm-cov` to fail with the cryptic error message:
```text
malformed instrumentation profile data: function name is empty
```
We can eliminate this mismatch by removing `instances_used` entirely, and instead inferring its contents from the keys of `pgo_func_name_var_map`.
This makes it impossible for a "used" function to lack a PGO name entry.
---
This is an attempt to eliminate the cause of rust-lang/rust#141577 when re-landing changes like rust-lang/rust#144298 in the future.
I haven't been able to reproduce the underlying issue in an in-tree test, because the only known repro involves a non-trivial derive proc-macro that relies on `syn` and `proc-macro2`. But I have manually verified in a separate branch that this change would have prevented the reoccurrence of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141577#issuecomment-3120667286.
Various refactors to the codegen coordinator code (part 3)
Continuing from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144062 this removes an option without any known users, uses the object crate in favor of LLVM for getting the LTO bitcode and improves the coordinator channel handling.
Port the proc macro attributes to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
Ports `#[proc_macro]`, `#[proc_macro_attribute]`, `#[proc_macro_derive]` and `#[rustc_builtin_macro]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issuecomment-2971351163
I've split this PR into commits for reviewability, and left some comments to clarify things
I did 4 related attributes in one PR because they share a lot of their code and logic, and doing them separately is kind of annoying as I need to leave both the old and new parsing in place then.
r? ``@oli-obk``
cc ``@jdonszelmann``
Don't special-case llvm.* as nounwind
Certain LLVM intrinsics, such as `llvm.wasm.throw`, can unwind. Marking them as nounwind causes us to skip cleanup of locals and optimize out `catch_unwind` under inlining or when `llvm.wasm.throw` is used directly by user code.
The motivation for forcibly marking llvm.* as nounwind is no longer present: most intrinsics are linked as `extern "C"` or other non-unwinding ABIs, so we won't codegen `invoke` for them anyway.
Closesrust-lang/rust#132416.
`@rustbot` label +T-compiler +A-panic
In rustc it doesn't really matter what the order of the witnesses is, but I'm planning to use the witnesses for implementing the "add missing match arms" assist in rust-analyzer, and there `true` before `false` is the natural order (like `Some` before `None`), and also what the current assist does.
The current order doesn't seem to be intentional; the code was created when bool ctors became their own thing, not just int ctors, but for integer, 0 before 1 is indeed the natural order.
FractalFir