Do not depend on the stored value when trying to cache on disk.
Having different criteria for loading and saving of query results can lead to saved results that may never be loaded.
Since the on-disk cache is discarded as soon as a compilation error is issued, there should not be any need for an exclusion mecanism based on errors.
As a result, the possibility to condition the storage on the value itself does not appear useful.
Implement -Z location-detail flag
This PR implements the `-Z location-detail` flag as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2091 .
`-Z location-detail=val` controls what location details are tracked when using `caller_location`. This allows users to control what location details are printed as part of panic messages, by allowing them to exclude any combination of filenames, line numbers, and column numbers. This option is intended to provide users with a way to mitigate the size impact of `#[track_caller]`.
Some measurements of the savings of this approach on an embedded binary can be found here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70579#issuecomment-942556822 .
Closes#70580 (unless people want to leave that open as a place for discussion of further improvements).
This is my first real PR to rust, so any help correcting mistakes / understanding side effects / improving my tests is appreciated :)
I have one question: RFC 2091 specified this as a debugging option (I think that is what -Z implies?). Does that mean this can never be stabilized without a separate MCP? If so, do I need to submit an MCP now, or is the initial RFC specifying this option sufficient for this to be merged as is, and then an MCP would be needed for eventual stabilization?
add feature flag for `type_changing_struct_update`
This implements the PR0 part of the mentoring notes within #86618.
overrides the previous inactive #86646 pr.
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
Report fatal lexer errors in `--cfg` command line arguments
Fixes#89358. The erroneous behavior was apparently introduced by `@Mark-Simulacrum` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/a678e3191197f145451c97c6cc884e15cae38186; the idea is to silence individual parser errors and instead emit one catch-all error message after parsing. However, for the example in #89358, a fatal lexer error is created here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/edebf77e0090195bf80c0d8cda821e1bf9d03053/compiler/rustc_parse/src/lexer/mod.rs#L340-L349
This fatal error aborts the compilation, and so the call to `new_parser_from_source_str()` never returns and the catch-all error message is never emitted. I have therefore changed the `SilentEmitter` to silence only non-fatal errors; with my changes, for the rustc invocation described in #89358:
```sh
rustc --cfg "abc\""
```
I get the following output:
```
error[E0765]: unterminated double quote string
|
= note: this error occurred on the command line: `--cfg=abc"`
```
Fix const qualification when executed after promotion
The const qualification was so far performed before the promotion and
the implementation assumed that it will never encounter a promoted.
With `const_precise_live_drops` feature, checking for live drops is
delayed until after drop elaboration, which in turn runs after
promotion. so the assumption is no longer true. When evaluating
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is now possible to encounter promoteds.
Use type base qualification for the promoted. It is a sound
approximation in general, and in the specific case of promoteds and
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is precise.
Fixes#89938.
rustc_ast: Turn `MutVisitor::token_visiting_enabled` into a constant
It's a visitor property rather than something that needs to be determined at runtime
Update E0637 description to mention `&` w/o an explicit lifetime name
Deal with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89824#issuecomment-941598647. Another solution would be splitting the error code into two as (I think) it's a bit unclear to users why they have the same error code.
Don't mark for loop iter expression as desugared
We typically don't mark spans of lowered things as desugared. This helps Clippy rightly discern when code is (not) from expansion. This was discovered by ``@flip1995`` at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7789#issuecomment-939289501.
Rollup of 14 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86984 (Reject octal zeros in IPv4 addresses)
- #87440 (Remove unnecessary condition in Barrier::wait())
- #88644 (`AbstractConst` private fields)
- #89292 (Stabilize CString::from_vec_with_nul[_unchecked])
- #90010 (Avoid overflow in `VecDeque::with_capacity_in()`.)
- #90029 (Add test for debug logging during incremental compilation)
- #90031 (config: add the option to enable LLVM tests)
- #90048 (Add test for line-number setting)
- #90071 (Remove hir::map::blocks and use FnKind instead)
- #90074 (2229 migrations small cleanup)
- #90077 (Make `From` impls of NonZero integer const.)
- #90097 (Add test for duplicated sidebar entries for reexported macro)
- #90098 (Add test to ensure that the missing_doc_code_examples is not triggered on foreign trait implementations)
- #90099 (Fix MIRI UB in `Vec::swap_remove`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove hir::map::blocks and use FnKind instead
The principal tool is `FnLikeNode`, which is not often used and can be easily implemented using `rustc_hir::intravisit::FnKind`.
Don't emit a warning for empty rmeta files.
This avoids displaying a warning when attempting to load an empty rmeta file. Warnings were enabled via #89634 which can cause a lot of noise (for example, running `./x.py check`). rustc generates empty rmeta files for things like binaries, which can happen when checking libraries as unittests.
Closes#89795
Merge the two depkind vtables
Knowledge of `DepKind`s is managed using two arrays containing flags (is_anon, eval_always, fingerprint_style), and function pointers (forcing and loading code).
This PR aims at merging the two arrays so as to reduce unneeded indirect calls and (hopefully) increase code locality.
r? `@ghost`
Erase late-bound regions before computing vtable debuginfo name.
Fixes#90019.
The `msvc_enum_fallback()` for computing enum type names needs to access the memory layout of niche enums in order to determine the type name. `compute_debuginfo_vtable_name()` did not properly erase regions before computing type names which made memory layout computation ICE when encountering un-erased regions.
r? `@wesleywiser`
resolve: Use `NameBinding` for local variables and generic parameters
`NameBinding` is a structure used for representing any name introduction (an item, or import, or even a built-in).
Except that local variables and generic parameters weren't represented as `NameBinding`s, for this reason they requires separate paths in name resolution code in several places.
This PR introduces `NameBinding`s for local variables as well and simplifies all the code working with them leaving only the `NameBinding` paths.
Add support for artifact size profiling
This adds support for profiling artifact file sizes (incremental compilation artifacts and query cache to begin with).
Eventually we want to track this in perf.rlo so we can ensure that file sizes do not change dramatically on each pull request.
This relies on support in measureme: https://github.com/rust-lang/measureme/pull/169. Once that lands we can update this PR to not point to a git dependency.
This was worked on together with `@michaelwoerister.`
r? `@wesleywiser`
Adopt let_else across the compiler
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
```
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
To simplify it to:
```
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
By adopting the `let_else` feature (cc #87335).
The PR also updates the syn crate because the currently used version of the crate doesn't support `let_else` syntax yet.
Note: Generally I'm the person who *removes* usages of unstable features from the compiler, not adds more usages of them, but in this instance I think it hopefully helps the feature get stabilized sooner and in a better state. I have written a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205) on the tracking issue about my experience and what I feel could be improved before stabilization of `let_else`.
bors