rustdoc: Erase `#![doc(document_private_items)]`
I just found out about the existence of `#![doc(document_private_items)]`. Apparently it was added by PR rust-lang/rust#50669 back in 2018 without any tests or docs as a replacement for some specific forms of the removed `#![doc(passes)]` / `#![doc(no_default_passes)]`.
However, rustc and rustdoc actually emit the deny-by-default lint `invalid_doc_attributes` for it (but if you allow it, the attribute does function)! To be more precise since PR rust-lang/rust#82708 (1.52, May 2021) which introduced lint `invalid_doc_attributes`, rust{,do}c has emitted a future-incompat warning for this attribute. And since PR rust-lang/rust#111505 (1.78, May 2024) that lint is deny by default. I presume nobody knew this attribute existed and thus it was never allowlisted.
Given the fact that since 2021 nobody has ever opened a ticket ([via](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+document_private_items)) complaining about the lint emission and the fact that GitHub code search doesn't yield any actual uses ([via](https://github.com/search?q=%2F%23%21%5C%5Bdoc%5C%28.*%3Fdocument_private_items%2F+language%3ARust&type=code&ref=advsearch)), I'm led to believe that nobody knows about and uses this attribute.
I don't find the existence of this attribute to be justified since in my view the flag `--document-private-items` is strictly superior: In most if not all cases, you don't want to "couple" your crate with this "mode" even if you gate it behind a cfg; instead, you most likely want to set this manually at invocation time, via a build config file like `.cargo/config.toml` or via a command runner like `just` I'd say.
Because of this I propose to wipe this attribute from existence. I don't believe it's worth cratering this (i.e., temporarily emitting a hard error for this attribute and running crater) given the fact that it's been undocumented since forever and led to a warning for years.
mgca: Finish implementation of `#[type_const]`
tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#132980fixesrust-lang/rust#140729fixesrust-lang/rust#140860
- **Fix `#[type_const]` attribute placement validation**
- **Perform WF-checking on type_const RHS's**
- **Check type_const type is ConstParamTy_ and that RHS matches it**
- **Check that impls of `#[type_const]` consts also have the attr**
r? ```@BoxyUwU```
Remove `#[const_trait]`
Remove `#[const_trait]` since we now have `const trait`. Update all structured diagnostics that still suggested the attribute.
r? ```@rust-lang/project-const-traits```
mgca: Add ConstArg representation for const items
tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#132980fixesrust-lang/rust#131046fixesrust-lang/rust#134641
As part of implementing `min_generic_const_args`, we need to distinguish const items that can be used in the type system, such as in associated const equality projections, from const items containing arbitrary const code, which must be kept out of the type system. Specifically, all "type consts" must be either concrete (no generics) or generic with a trivial expression like `N` or a path to another type const item.
To syntactically distinguish these cases, we require, for now at least, that users annotate all type consts with the `#[type_const]` attribute. Then, we validate that the const's right-hand side is indeed eligible to be a type const and represent it differently in the HIR.
We accomplish this representation using a new `ConstItemRhs` enum in the HIR, and a similar but simpler enum in the AST. When `#[type_const]` is **not** applied to a const (e.g. on stable), we represent const item right-hand sides (rhs's) as HIR bodies, like before. However, when the attribute is applied, we instead lower to a `hir::ConstArg`. This syntactically distinguishes between trivial const args (paths) and arbitrary expressions, which are represented using `AnonConst`s. Then in `generics_of`, we can take advantage of the existing machinery to bar the `AnonConst` rhs's from using parent generics.
Unify the configuration of the compiler docs
Previously it was rather inconsistent which crates got the rust logo and which didn't and setting html_root_url was forgotten in many cases.
Deduplicate deprecation warning when using unit or tuple structs
First commit adds a test that's broken currently, 2nd commit fixes it.
Created with `@WaffleLapkin`
Implement pin-project in pattern matching for `&pin mut|const T`
This PR implements part of rust-lang/rust#130494. It supports pin-project in pattern matching for `&pin mut|const T`.
~Pin-projection by field access (i.e. `&pin mut|const place.field`) is not fully supported yet since pinned-borrow is not ready (rust-lang/rust#135731).~
CC ``````@traviscross``````
Issue-125323: ICE non-ADT in struct pattern when long time constant evaluation is in for loop
This PR fixes#125323
## Context
According to the issue, the ICE happens since #121206.
In the PR, some error methods were reorganized. For example, has_errors() was renamed to has_errors_exclude_lint_errors(). However, some codes which used the original has_errors() were not switched to has_errors_exclude_lint_errors(). I finally found that report_error() in writeback.rs causes this ICE. Currently the method uses tainted_by_errors() to get guar (ErrorGuaranteed), but originally it used dcx().has_errors() but it wasn't changed to has_errors_exclude_lint_errors() when changes in #121206 were merged. I don't think I fully understand how an error is propagated, but I suppose that the error from long time constant evaluation is unexpectedly propagated other parts (in this ICE, for loop), then cause the non-ADT in struct pattern ICE.
## Change
- Fix report_error() in writeback.rs: use dcx().has_errors_exclude_lint_errors() instead of tainted_by_errors() to prevent error propagation from constant evaluation.
- Add test for the ICE
- Modify some tests to align the change: Due to this fix, E0282 error happens (or not happen anymore) in some tests.
## NOTE
The 4th commit aims to revert the fix in #123516 because I confirmed that the ICE solved by the PR doesn't happen if I modify report_error(). I think the root cause of that ICE is the same as #125323 . But I can discard this commit since we can fix#125323 without it.
error from const eval lint causes ICE at check_pat in late_lint, because the function expects the typeck result isn't tainted by error but it is.
To avoid the ICE, check_pat returns earlier if the typeck_result is tainted.
check_mod_deathness also has an issue from the same reason. visit_body for making live symbols expects the typeck result has no error.
So this commit adds a check in visit_nested_body to avoid the ICE.
However, if visit_nested_body just returns without doing anything, all codes with the error are marked as dead, because live_symbols is empty.
To avoid this side effect, visit_nested_body and other visit_* functions in MarkSymbolVistior should return appropriate error.
If a function returns ControlFlow::Break, live_symbols_and_ignore_derived_traits returns earlier with error,
then check_mod_deathness, the caller of the function returns earlier without pushing everything into dead_codes.
only check duplicates on old/unparsed attributes
r? ``@JonathanBrouwer``
This was effectively already what we were doing, but this was implicit because `.name()` etc were just returning None when dealing with a parsed attribute.... this makes it explicit
reduce calls to attr.span() in old doc attr parsing
r? `@oli-obk`
should be trivial, can also delegate to `@GuillaumeGomez` or `@JonathanBrouwer.`
As part of making span() return an option I want to reduce the number of places we call span in without it being known what specific attr it's for. This makes that more obvious for doc. Part of a chain of PRs that's coming.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issuecomment-3395316064
Stuart Cook