Add `cast_init` and `cast_uninit` methods for pointers
ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#627
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#145036
This includes an incredibly low-effort search to find uses that could be switched to using these methods. I only searched for `cast::<\w>` and `cast::<MaybeUninit` because there would otherwise be way too much to look through, and I also didn't modify anything inside submodules/subtrees.
Use a time representation with 1900-01-01-00:00:00 at timezone -1440 min as
anchor. This is the earliest time supported in UEFI.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
std: sys: io: io_slice: Add UEFI types
UEFI networking APIs do support vectored read/write. While the types for UDP4, UDP6, TCP4 and TCP6 are defined separately, they are essentially the same C struct. So we can map IoSlice and IoSliceMut to have the same binary representation.
Since all UEFI networking types for read/write are DSTs, `IoSlice` and `IoSliceMut` will need to be copied to the end of the transmit/receive structures. So having the same binary representation just allows us to do a single memcpy instead of having to loop and set the DST.
cc ``@nicholasbishop``
Replace unsafe `security_attributes` function with safe `inherit_handle` alternative
The `security_attributes` function is marked as safe despite taking a raw pointer which will later be used. Fortunately this function is only used internally and only in one place that has been basically the same for a decade now. However, we only ever set one bool so it's easy enough to replace with something that's actually safe.
In the future we might want to expose the ability for users to set security attributes. But that should be properly designed (and safe!).
The `security_attributes` function is marked as safe despite taking a raw pointer which will later be used. Fortunately this function is only used internally and only in one place that has been basically the same for a decade now.
However, we only ever set one bool so it's easy enough to replace with something that's actually safe.
Fix doc comment of File::try_lock and File::try_lock_shared
The doc comments of functions `File::try_lock` and `File::try_lock_shared` stabilized today in version 1.89.0 document an incorrect type of `Ok`.
The result type was changed in rust-lang/rust#139343 after the latest change to the doc comments in rust-lang/rust#136876.
compiler-builtins: plumb LSE support for aarch64 on linux/gnu when optimized-compiler-builtins not enabled
Add dynamic support for aarch64 LSE atomic ops on linux/gnu targets when optimized-compiler-builtins is not enabled.
Enabling LSE is the primary motivator for rust-lang/rust#143689, though extending the rust version doesn't seem too farfetched. Are there more details which I have overlooked which make this impractical? I've tested this on an aarch64 host with LSE.
r? ```````@tgross35```````
bump bootstrap compiler to 1.90 beta
There were significantly less `cfg(bootstrap)` and `cfg(not(bootstrap))` this release. Presumably due to the fact that we change the bootstrap stage orderings to reduce the need for them and it was successful 🙏
Miri: non-deterministic floating point operations in `foreign_items`
Part of [rust-lang/miri/#3555](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3555#issue-2278914000), this pr does the `foreign_items` work.
Some things have changed since rust-lang/rust#138062 and rust-lang/rust#142514. I moved the "helpers" used for creating fixed outputs and clamping operations to their defined ranges to `math.rs`. These are now also extended to handle the floating-point operations in `foreign_items`. Tests in `miri/tests/float.rs` were changed/added.
Failing tests in `std` were extracted, run under miri with `-Zmiri-many-seeds=0..1000` and changed accordingly. Double checked with `-Zmiri-many-seeds`.
I noticed that the C standard doesn't specify the output ranges for all of its mathematical operations; it just specifies them as:
```
Returns
The sinh functions return sinh x.
```
So I used [Wolfram|Alpha](https://www.wolframalpha.com/).
Print thread ID in panic message
`panic!` does not print any identifying information for threads that are
unnamed. However, in many cases, the thread ID can be determined.
This changes the panic message from something like this:
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src/main.rs:3:5:
explicit panic
To something like this:
thread '<unnamed>' (12345) panicked at src/main.rs:3:5:
explicit panic
Stack overflow messages are updated as well.
This change applies to both named and unnamed threads. The ID printed is
the OS integer thread ID rather than the Rust thread ID, which should
also be what debuggers print.
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: dist-apple-various
try-job: dist-various-*
try-job: dist-x86_64-freebsd
try-job: dist-x86_64-illumos
try-job: dist-x86_64-netbsd
try-job: dist-x86_64-solaris
try-job: test-various
try-job: x86_64-gnu
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
`panic!` does not print any identifying information for threads that are
unnamed. However, in many cases, the thread ID can be determined.
This changes the panic message from something like this:
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src/main.rs:3:5:
explicit panic
To something like this:
thread '<unnamed>' (0xff9bf) panicked at src/main.rs:3:5:
explicit panic
Stack overflow messages are updated as well.
This change applies to both named and unnamed threads. The ID printed is
the OS integer thread ID rather than the Rust thread ID, which should
also be what debuggers print.
add code example showing that file_prefix treats dotfiles as the name of a file, not an extension
This came up in a libs-api meeting while we were reviewing rust-lang/rust#144870
Change visibility of Args new function
Currently the Args new function is constrained to pub(super) but this stops me from being able to construct Args structs in unit tests.
This pull request is to change this to pub.
Create a private module to hold the bootstrap code needed enable LSE
at startup on aarch64-*-linux-* targets when rust implements the
intrinsics.
This is a bit more heavyweight than compiler-rt's LSE initialization,
but has the benefit of initializing the aarch64 cpu feature detection
for other uses.
Using the rust initialization code does use some atomic operations,
that's OK. Mixing LSE and non-LSE operations should work while the
update flag propagates.
Document Poisoning in `LazyCell` and `LazyLock`
Currently, there is no documentation of poisoning behavior in either `LazyCell` or `LazyLock`, even though both of them can be observed as poisoned by users.
`LazyCell` [plagyround example](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=9cf38b8dc56db100848f54085c2c697d)
`LazyLock` [playground example](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=f1cd6f9fe16636e347ebb695a0ce30c0)
# Open Questions
- [x] Is it worth making the implementation of `LazyLock` more complicated to ensure that the the panic message is `"LazyLock instance has previously been poisoned"` instead of `"Once instance has previously been poisoned"`? See the `LazyLock` playground link above for more context.
- [x] Does it make sense to move `LazyLock` into the `poison` module? It is certainly a poison-able type, but at the same time it is slightly different from the 4 other types currently in the `poison` module in that it is unrecoverable. I think this is more of a libs-api question.
``@rustbot`` label +T-libs-api
Please let me know if these open questions deserve a separate issue / PR!
UEFI networking APIs do support vectored read/write. While the types for
UDP4, UDP6, TCP4 and TCP6 are defined separately, they are essentially
the same C struct. So we can map IoSlice and IoSliceMut to have the same
binary representation.
Since all UEFI networking types for read/write are DSTs, `IoSlice` and
`IoSliceMut` will need to be copied to the end of the transmit/receive
structures. So having the same binary representation just allows us to
do a single memcpy instead of having to loop and set the DST.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
Remove unnecessary `rust_` prefixes
part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116005
Honestly, not sure if this can affect linking somehow, also I didn't touched things like `__rust_panic_cleanup` and `__rust_start_panic` which very likely will break something, so just small cleanup here
also didn't changed `rust_panic_without_hook` because it was renamed here https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144852
r? libs
Jakub Beránek