Commit Graph

8688 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors aaade2d12d Auto merge of #12855 - tesuji:fix-author-lint, r=Jarcho
Fix typos of author lint

changelog: none
2024-06-11 22:49:18 +00:00
bors 38d12a9bc0 Auto merge of #12681 - y21:issue12677, r=Jarcho
Let `qualify_min_const_fn` deal with drop terminators

Fixes #12677

The `method_accepts_droppable` check that was there seemed overly conservative.
> Returns true if any of the method parameters is a type that implements `Drop`.
> The method can't be made const then, because `drop` can't be const-evaluated.

Accepting parameters that implement `Drop` should still be fine as long as the parameter isn't actually dropped, as is the case in the linked issue where the droppable is moved into the return place. This more accurate analysis ("is there a `drop` terminator") is already done by `qualify_min_const_fn` [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/f5e250180c342bb52808c9a934c962a8fe40afc7/clippy_utils/src/qualify_min_const_fn.rs#L298), so I don't think this additional check is really necessary?

Fixing the other, second case in the linked issue was only slightly more involved, since `Vec::new()` is a function call that has the ability to panic, so there must be a `drop()` terminator for cleanup, however we should be able to freely ignore that. [Const checking ignores cleanup blocks](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/check.rs#L382-L388), so we should, too?

r? `@Jarcho`

----

changelog: [`missing_const_for_fn`]: continue linting on fns with parameters implementing `Drop` if they're not actually dropped
2024-06-11 22:38:52 +00:00
AurelienFT c86b19f1ef Add lint to check manual pattern char comparison and merge its code with single_char_pattern lint 2024-06-11 21:56:14 +02:00
bors 9ddea51a73 Auto merge of #12912 - lochetti:fix_12824, r=dswij
Don't lint indexing_slicing lints on proc macros

This pr fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12824

Even though the issue mentions the indexing case only, it was easy to apply the fix to the slicing case as well.

changelog: [`out_of_bounds_indexing`, `indexing_slicing`]: Don't lint on procedural macros.
2024-06-11 15:27:36 +00:00
bors 87c895ad83 Auto merge of #12915 - belyakov-am:lint/single_char_add_str, r=xFrednet
Handle single chars with `to_string()` for `single_char_add_str`

Add support for single chars / literals with `to_string()` call for `push_str()` and `insert_str()`.

changelog: [`single_char_add_str`]: handle single chars with `to_string()` call

Closes #12775
2024-06-11 11:08:45 +00:00
Renato Lochetti f7515ae905 Don't lint indexing_slicing lints on proc macros 2024-06-10 09:08:56 +01:00
Artem Belyakov 55344c84a5 Handle single chars with to_string() for single_char_add_str 2024-06-09 21:01:00 +03:00
Lzu Tao 2855a876a7 fix typos of author lint 2024-06-08 12:31:49 +00:00
bors 48686adf48 Auto merge of #12805 - Alexendoo:blocks-in-conditions-closures, r=dswij
Don't lint blocks in closures for blocks_in_conditions

Seemed like an outlier for the lint which generally caught only the syntactically confusing cases, it lints blocks in closures but excludes closures passed to iterator methods, this changes it to ignore closures in general

changelog: none
2024-06-08 09:45:22 +00:00
bors 0ea88b90d8 Auto merge of #12900 - Alexendoo:no-lazy-static, r=llogiq
Remove `lazy_static` mention

I planned to replace any mention with `LazyLock` but I think `thread_local` is more appropriate here - `const`s that aren't `Sync` wouldn't be able to go in a `lazy_static`/`static LazyLock` either

Also removed a test file that was mostly commented out so wasn't testing anything

changelog: none
2024-06-07 22:54:02 +00:00
bors d553ebef57 Auto merge of #12851 - samueltardieu:issue12846, r=y21
Add required parentheses around method receiver

Fix #12846

changelog: [`needless_bool`]: Add missing parentheses around method receiver
2024-06-07 21:27:46 +00:00
y21 973f318514 qualify_min_const_fn: ignore cleanup bbs 2024-06-07 20:56:22 +02:00
y21 6fdf295664 let qualify_min_const_fn deal with drop checks 2024-06-07 20:56:22 +02:00
J-ZhengLi 1781333ec7 [match_same_arms]: add a test case with lifetimes 2024-06-08 00:06:20 +08:00
Alex Macleod 65af5d7b22 Remove lazy_static mention 2024-06-07 12:51:37 +00:00
Alex Macleod b21ee38fa9 Don't lint blocks in closures for blocks_in_conditions 2024-06-07 11:21:38 +00:00
bors f990ea155e Auto merge of #12844 - Alexendoo:to-string-in-format-args, r=dswij
Fix `to_string_in_format_args` with macro call receiver

Fixes part of #12837

changelog: none
2024-06-07 09:52:17 +00:00
bors 0f87a81882 Auto merge of #12822 - Alexendoo:for-each-expr, r=dswij
Make `for_each_expr` visit closures by default, rename the old version `for_each_expr_without_closures`

A lot of the time `for_each_expr` is picked when closures should be visited so I think it makes sense for this to be the default with the alternative available for when you don't need to visit them.

The first commit renames `for_each_expr` to `for_each_expr_without_closures` and `for_each_expr_with_closures` to `for_each_expr`

The second commit switches a few uses that I caught over to include closures to fix a few bugs

changelog: none
2024-06-07 09:42:37 +00:00
bors 0b441d5ac5 Auto merge of #12877 - y21:const_host_ice, r=dswij
Handle const effects inherited from parent correctly in `type_certainty`

This fixes a (debug) ICE in `type_certainty` that happened in the [k256 crate]. (I'm sure you can also specifically construct an edge test case that will run into type_certainty false positives visible outside of debug builds from this bug)

<details>
<summary>Minimal ICE repro</summary>

```rs
use std::ops::Add;
Add::add(1_i32, 1).add(i32::MIN);
```
</details>

The subtraction here overflowed:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/436675b4772049a0ff535bd46d944689c90ed750/clippy_utils/src/ty/type_certainty/mod.rs#L209

... when we have something like `Add::add` where `add` fn has 0 generic params but the `host_effect_index` is `Some(2)` (inherited from the parent generics, the const trait `Add`), and we end up executing `0 - 1`.

(Even if the own generics weren't empty and we didn't overflow, this would still be wrong because it would assume that a trait method with 1 generic parameter didn't have any generics).

So, *only* exclude the "host" generic parameter if it's actually bound by the own generics

changelog: none

[k256 crate]: https://github.com/RustCrypto/elliptic-curves/tree/master/k256
2024-06-07 09:33:48 +00:00
Renato Lochetti 478d44487e Allow manual_unwrap_or_default at useless_conversion_try tests 2024-06-06 21:44:06 +01:00
Renato Lochetti 5b63ab1131 Lint manual_unwrap_or_default for Result as well 2024-06-06 21:33:37 +01:00
Samuel Tardieu 35b2aa99f3 Add required parentheses around method receiver 2024-06-06 20:53:08 +02:00
bors 4e7f97467a Auto merge of #12827 - Alexendoo:lint-groups-priority, r=Jarcho
`lint_groups_priority`: ignore lints & groups at the same level

Fixes #12270

changelog: none
2024-06-06 12:09:58 +00:00
bors 6cfd4ac955 Auto merge of #10632 - Alexendoo:needless-maybe-sized, r=Jarcho
Add `needless_maybe_sized` lint

changelog: new lint: [`needless_maybe_sized`]

Closes #10600
2024-06-05 20:11:03 +00:00
bors d955d0a41f Auto merge of #12891 - paultag:paultag/fix-lint-description, r=Manishearth
Fix grammer for the Safety documentation check

The original message ("unsafe function's docs miss `# Safety` section") reads quite awkwardly. I've changed it to "unsafe function's docs are missing a `# Safety` section" to have it read better.

```
changelog: [`missing_headers`]: Tweak the grammar in the lint message
```
2024-06-05 20:00:59 +00:00
bors 1105e9debe Auto merge of #12700 - Luv-Ray:overly_complex_bool_expr, r=Jarcho
[`overly_complex_bool_expr`]: Fix trigger wrongly on never type

fixes #12689

---

changelog: fix [`overly_complex_bool_expr`] triggers wrongly on never type
2024-06-05 19:47:43 +00:00
bors bc00d7b94d Auto merge of #12845 - cookie-s:dedup-boolmethods-diags, r=Jarcho
Dedup nonminimal_bool_methods diags

Relates to #12379

Fix `nonminimal_bool` lint so that it doesn't check the same span multiple times.

`NotSimplificationVisitor` was called for each expression from `NonminimalBoolVisitor` whereas `NotSimplificationVisitor` also recursively checked all expressions.

---

changelog: [`nonminimal_bool`]: Fix duplicate diagnostics
2024-06-05 19:09:55 +00:00
Paul R. Tagliamonte 35e2027a35 Fix grammer for the Safety documentation check
The original message ("unsafe function's docs miss `# Safety` section")
reads quite awkwardly. I've changed it to "unsafe function's docs are missing
a `# Safety` section" to have it read better.

Signed-off-by: Paul R. Tagliamonte <paultag@gmail.com>
2024-06-05 14:11:56 -04:00
bors 10d1f32685 Auto merge of #12886 - GuillaumeGomez:fix-needless_character_iteration, r=blyxyas
Fix false positive for `needless_character_iteration` lint

Fixes #12879.

changelog: Fix false positive for `needless_character_iteration` lint
2024-06-05 13:12:39 +00:00
Guillaume Gomez 158b65889c Fix false positive for needless_character_iteration lint 2024-06-04 21:12:08 +02:00
y21 708ef7955d only run flop lints on inherent method calls 2024-06-03 21:42:00 +02:00
bors 4f3180adac Auto merge of #12875 - y21:deprecate_cfg_lints, r=flip1995
Deprecate `maybe_misused_cfg` and `mismatched_target_os`

All cases that these two lints would catch are now caught by cargo/rustc's own check-cfg feature.

This was previously discussed on zulip: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Deprecate.20maybe_misused_cfg.20and.20mismatched_target_os

For the most part, this PR was automated with `cargo dev deprecate`

r? `@flip1995` cc `@Urgau`

changelog: deprecate [`maybe_misused_cfg`] and [`mismatched_target_os`]
2024-06-03 08:57:34 +00:00
bors 61d3e14718 Auto merge of #12815 - GuillaumeGomez:add-needless_character_iteration, r=xFrednet
Add `needless_character_iteration` lint

Fixes #4817.

r? `@xFrednet`

changelog: Add `needless_character_iteration` lint
2024-06-03 08:09:18 +00:00
bors 568f4fc732 Auto merge of #12871 - Jacherr:issue-12768, r=blyxyas
Modify str_to_string to be machine-applicable

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/12768

I'm not sure if there is any potential for edge cases with this - since it only ever acts on `&str` types I can't think of any, and especially since the methods do the same thing anyway.

changelog: allow `str_to_string` lint to be automatically applied
2024-06-02 21:11:06 +00:00
y21 25d40c9f6b handle parent const effects correctly in type_certainty 2024-06-01 20:10:48 +02:00
y21 f950961c42 deprecate mismatched_target_os 2024-06-01 14:11:07 +02:00
y21 4aa20d2e95 deprecate maybe_misused_cfg 2024-06-01 13:44:13 +02:00
bors 436675b477 Auto merge of #12868 - VitalikButerinEth:master, r=llogiq
chore: fix some comments

 fix some comments

----

changelog: none
2024-06-01 11:16:14 +00:00
Jacher 5d0fcfbf56 modify str_to_string to be machine-applicable 2024-06-01 09:05:27 +00:00
bors 28e887fe71 Auto merge of #12488 - Jacherr:issue-11525, r=llogiq
Disable `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11525

Disables `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls, specifically any implementations that also do not have a `get` method anywhere along the deref chain (so, for example, it still lints on Vec, which has its `get` method as part of the deref chain).

Thanks `@y21` for pointing me in the right direction with a couple of handy util functions for deref chain and inherent methods, saved a headache there!

changelog: FP: Disable `indexing_slicing` for custom Index impls
2024-05-31 16:42:50 +00:00
bors 0b598b636b Auto merge of #12865 - J-ZhengLi:issue12853, r=y21
fix [`redundant_closure`] suggesting incorrect code with `F: Fn()`

fixes: #12853

---

changelog: fix [`redundant_closure`] suggesting incorrect code with `F: Fn()`
2024-05-31 15:23:39 +00:00
bors e7efe4381a Auto merge of #12857 - WeiTheShinobi:non_canonical_impls, r=y21
fix: let non_canonical_impls skip proc marco

Fixed #12788

Although the issue only mentions `NON_CANONICAL_CLONE_IMPL`, this fix will also affect `NON_CANONICAL_PARTIAL_ORD_IMPL` because I saw
> Because of these unforeseeable or unstable behaviors, macro expansion should often not be regarded as a part of the stable API.

on Clippy Documentation and these two lints are similar, so I think it might be good, not sure if it's right or not.

---

changelog: `NON_CANONICAL_CLONE_IMPL`, `NON_CANONICAL_PARTIAL_ORD_IMPL` will skip proc marco now
2024-05-30 15:58:48 +00:00
WeiTheShinobi 1038927b47 fix: add test case, use a better conditional expression. 2024-05-30 23:40:17 +08:00
VitalikButerinEth b92501f124 chore: fix some comments
Signed-off-by: VitalikButerinEth <csyingyu@126.com>
2024-05-30 22:53:43 +08:00
Jacher 1c117f12ea ignore generics in handling 2024-05-30 13:15:25 +00:00
Jacherr ae59f5002d add additional testcases 2024-05-30 11:45:57 +00:00
Jacherr e186ed2ad1 check return type of get and indexing 2024-05-30 11:45:57 +00:00
Jacherr 93b39d8910 disable indexing_slicing for custom Index impls 2024-05-30 11:45:43 +00:00
bors 03654badfd Auto merge of #12864 - tesuji:non-no-effect, r=y21
ignore array from `deref_addrof` lint

Split from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/12854

changelog: ignore array from `deref_addrof` lint

r? y21
2024-05-30 10:16:50 +00:00
Philipp Krones 89037ea18f Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into rustup 2024-05-30 09:44:14 +02:00