Python 2 is needed for Clang 10, Python 3 for LLVM 12.
The Python 2 dependency could be removed by upgrading to Clang 11,
but that causes linker errors of unclear origin.
The panic when the right operand is `0` is expected, but the
overflow-related panic (which occurs only for `MIN % -1`) is somewhat
surprising for two reasons: a return value of `0` would be reasonable
in this case, and, for most arithmetic operations, overflow results in
panic only when `debug_assertions` is enabled. As a result, it's
helpful to document this behavior.
The panic on division by zero is expected, but the panic on overflow
is somewhat surprising (since most arithmetic operations panic on
overflow only when `debug_assertions` is enabled). As a result, it's
helpful to document this behavior.
This commit fixes the statement of the inequality that the Euclidean
remainder satisfies. (The remainder is guaranteed to be less than
abs(rhs), not rhs.) It also rewords the documentation to make it a
little easier to read.
This table is used twice in core::num::dec2flt::algorithm::power_of_ten.
According to the semantics of const, a separate huge definition of the
table is inlined at both places.
fn power_of_ten(e: i16) -> Fp {
assert!(e >= table::MIN_E);
let i = e - table::MIN_E;
let sig = table::POWERS.0[i as usize];
let exp = table::POWERS.1[i as usize];
Fp { f: sig, e: exp }
}
Theoretically this gets cleaned up by optimization passes, but in
practice I am experiencing a miscompile from LTO on this code. Making
the table a static, which would only be defined a single time and not
require attention from LTO, eliminates the miscompile and seems
semantically more appropriate anyway. A separate bug report on the LTO
bug is forthcoming.
Whether for Rust's own `target_os`, LLVM's triples, or GNU config's, the
OS-related have fields have been for code running *on* that OS, not code
that is *part* of the OS.
The difference is huge, as syscall interfaces are nothing like
freestanding interfaces. Kernels are (hypervisors and other more exotic
situations aside) freestanding programs that use the interfaces provided
by the hardware. It's *those* interfaces, the ones external to the
program being built and its software dependencies, that are the content
of the target.
For the Linux Kernel in particular, `target_env: "gnu"` is removed for
the same reason: that `-gnu` refers to glibc or GNU/linux, neither of
which applies to the kernel itself.
Relates to #74247
Thanks @ojeda for catching some things.
Clarify that SyncOnceCell::set blocks.
Reading the discussion of this feature, I gained the mistaken impression that neither `set` nor `get` blocked, and thus calling `get` immediately after `set` was not guaranteed to succeed. It turns out that `set` *does* block, guaranteeing that the cell contains a value once `set` returns. This change updates the documentation to state that explicitly.
Happy to adjust the wording as desired.
Apply lint restrictions from renamed lints
Previously, if you denied the old name of a renamed lint, it would warn
about using the new name, but otherwise do nothing. Now, it will behave
the same as if you'd used the new name.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82615.
r? `@ehuss`
Remove `ENABLE_DOWNLOAD_RUSTC` constant
`ENABLE_DOWNLOAD_RUSTC` was introduced as part of the MVP for `download-rustc` as a way not to rebuild artifacts that have already been downloaded. Unfortunately, it doesn't work very well:
- Steps are ignored by default, which makes it easy to leave out a step
that should be built. For example, the MVP forgot to enable any tests,
so it was only possible to *build* locally.
- It didn't work correctly even when it was enabled: calling
`builder.ensure()` would completely ignore the constant and rebuild the
step anyway. This has no obvious fix since `ensure()` has to return a
`Step::Output`.
Instead, this handles `download-rustc` in `impl Step for Rustc` and
`impl Step for Std`, which to my knowledge are the only build steps that
don't first go through `impl Step for Sysroot` (`Rustc` is used for
the `rustc-dev` component).
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79540#discussion_r563350075 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81930 for further context.
Here are some example runs with these changes and `download-rustc`
enabled:
```
$ x.py build src/tools/clippy
Building stage1 tool clippy-driver (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 1m 09s
Building stage1 tool cargo-clippy (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.11s
$ x.py test src/tools/clippy
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s
Building stage1 tool clippy-driver (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.09s
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.28s
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 15.26s
Running build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/clippy_driver-8b407b140e0aa91c
test result: ok. 592 passed; 0 failed; 3 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out
$ x.py build src/tools/rustdoc
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 41.28s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:41
$ x.py test src/test/rustdoc-ui
Building stage0 tool compiletest (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.12s
Building rustdoc for stage1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 0.10s
test result: ok. 105 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 8.15s
$ x.py build compiler/rustc
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.09s
Build completed successfully in 0:00:00
```
Note a few things:
- Clippy depends on stage1 rustc-dev artifacts, but rustc didn't have to
be recompiled. Instead, the artifacts were copied automatically.
- All steps are always enabled. There is no danger of forgetting a step,
since only the entrypoints have to handle `download-rustc`.
- Building the compiler (`compiler/rustc`) automatically does no work.
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81930.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
config.toml parsing error improvements
Improve error messages for musl-libdir and wasi-root keys. Previously
the parser would panic with `unwrap()`. Now it prints
Target "wasm32-wasi" does not have a "wasi-root" key
(and similar for the `musl-libdir` field, which is used in target that
use musl)
Also update comments around wasi-root field to make it clear that the
field is only valid in wasm32-wasi target and needs to be moved to a
`[target.wasm32-wasi]` section to be valid.
Fixes#82317
---
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
make x86_64-pc-solaris the default target for x86-64 Solaris
This change makes `x86_64-pc-solaris` the default compilation target for x86-64 Solaris/Illumos (based on [this exchange](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68214#issuecomment-748042054) with `@varkor).`
I tried several ways of doing this (leveraging the alias support added with #61761 and improved/fixed with #80073) and found out that cross-compilation to the new one is by far the simplest way of doing this. It can be achieved by adding the following arguments: `--build x86_64-sun-solaris --host x86_64-pc-solaris --target x86_64-pc-solaris` and enabling the cross compilation with `PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_CROSS=1` environment variable.
I also removed alias support altogether - `x86_64-pc-solaris` and `x86_64-sun-solaris` are now two separate targets. The problem with aliases is that even if rust internally knows that two are the same, other tools building with rust don't know that, resulting in build issues like the one with firefox mentioned [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68214#issuecomment-746144229). I think that once the dust settles and `x86_64-pc-solaris` becomes the default, `x86_64-sun-solaris` can be removed.
If you agree with the above, I have two subsequent questions:
1. Is there a preferred way to display deprecation warnings when `x86_64-sun-solaris` is passed into the compiler as an argument? I am not sure whether target deprecation was done before.
2. Where would be the best way to document this change for those using rust on Solaris? Without the cross-compilation arguments (used once to build a new version), the build won't work. Should I add it into [RELEASES.md](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/RELEASES.md)?
Thanks!
Remove storage markers if they won't be used during code generation
The storage markers constitute a substantial portion of all MIR
statements. At the same time, for builds without any optimizations,
the storage markers have no further use during and after MIR
optimization phase.
If storage markers are not necessary for code generation, remove them.
lintcheck, do some refactoring and add more sources
refactor: add a Config object
don't run in parallel mode by default (it didn't make sense because cargo would lock the shared target dir anyway)
show full paths (from repo root) to the source files in clippy warnings so we can just copy the path from the logfile
fix more bugs
add more crates by dtolnay and embark to the sources toml
changelog: lintcheck: refactor some code and add more sources
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #82309 (Propagate RUSTDOCFLAGS in the environment when documenting)
- #82403 (rustbuild: print out env vars on verbose rustc invocations)
- #82507 (Rename the `tidy` binary to `rust-tidy`)
- #82531 (Add GUI tests)
- #82532 (Add `build.print_step_rusage` to config.toml)
- #82543 (fix env var name in CI)
- #82622 (Propagate `--test-args` for `x.py test src/tools/cargo`)
- #82628 (Try to clarify GlobalAlloc::realloc documentation comment.)
- #82630 (Fix a typo in the `find_anon_type` doc)
- #82643 (Add more proc-macro attribute tests)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Improve error messages for musl-libdir and wasi-root keys. Previously
the parser would panic with `unwrap()`. Now it prints
Target "wasm32-wasi" does not have a "wasi-root" key
(and similar for the `musl-libdir` field, which is used in target that
use musl)
Also update comments around wasi-root field to make it clear that the
field is only valid in wasm32-wasi target and needs to be moved to a
`[target.wasm32-wasi]` section to be valid.
Fixes#82317
Try to clarify GlobalAlloc::realloc documentation comment.
This PR tries to improve the documentation of [GlobalAlloc::realloc](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/alloc/trait.GlobalAlloc.html#method.realloc) with two aspects:
1. Explicitly mention that `realloc` preserves the contents of the original memory block.
2. Explicitly mention which layout should be used to deallocate the reallocated block.
Add GUI tests
The start of a lot more of GUI tests! \o/
One test is to ensure that the search input can always be selected in all rustdoc "modes" (mobile, tablet mostly) whereas the second checks the shortcuts.
r? `@jyn514`
Nikita Popov