This commit removes all jemalloc related submodules, configuration, etc,
from the bootstrap, from the standard library, and from the compiler.
This will be followed up with a change to use jemalloc specifically as
part of rustc on blessed platforms.
Non-naive implementation of `VecDeque.append`
Replaces the old, simple implementation with a more manual (and **unsafe** 😱) one. I've added 1 more test and verified that it covers all 6 code paths in the function.
This new implementation was about 60% faster than the old naive one when I tried benchmarking it.
Incorporate a stray test
`liballoc/repeat-generic-slice.rs` doesn't seem to be tested (I think it was intended to be placed in `run-pass`). This PR incorporates the test into `liballoc/tests`.
Deprecation of str::slice_unchecked(_mut)
Closes#51715
I am not sure if 1.28.0 or 1.29.0 should be used for deprecation version, for now it's 1.28.0.
Additionally I've replaced `slice_unchecked` uses with `get_unchecked`. The only places where this method is still used are `src/liballoc/tests/str.rs` and `src/liballoc/tests/str.rs`.
old tests cover the new fast path of str joining already
this adds tests for joining into Strings with long separators (>4 byte) and
for joining into Vec<T>, T: Clone + !Copy. Vec<T: Copy> will be
specialised when specialisation type inference bugs are fixed.
Escape combining characters in char::Debug
Although combining characters are technically printable, they make little sense to print on their own with `Debug`: it'd be better to escape them like non-printable characters.
This is a breaking change, but I imagine the fact `escape_debug` is rare and almost certainly primarily used for debugging that this is an acceptable change.
Resolves#41922.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @clarcharr
Give SliceIndex impls a test suite of girth befitting the implementation (and fix a UTF8 boundary check)
So one day I was writing something in my codebase that basically amounted to `impl SliceIndex for (Bound<usize>, Bound<usize>)`, and I said to myself:
*Boy, gee, golly! I never realized bounds checking was so tricky!*
At some point when I had around 60 lines of tests for it, I decided to go see how the standard library does it to see if I missed any edge cases. ...That's when I discovered that libcore only had about 40 lines of tests for slicing altogether, and none of them even used `..=`.
---
This PR includes:
* **Literally the first appearance of the word `get_unchecked_mut` in any directory named `test` or `tests`.**
* Likewise the first appearance of `get_mut` used with _any type of range argument_ in these directories.
* Tests for the panics on overflow with `..=`.
* I wanted to test on `[(); usize::MAX]` as well but that takes linear time in debug mode </3
* A horrible and ugly test-generating macro for the `should_panic` tests that increases the DRYness by a single order of magnitude (which IMO wasn't enough, but I didn't want to go any further and risk making the tests inaccessible to next guy).
* Same stuff for str!
* Actually, the existing `str` tests were pretty good. I just helped filled in the holes.
* [A fix for the bug it caught](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50002). (only one ~~sadly~~)
Alex Crichton